Literature DB >> 16022206

Efficacy of an E-mail intervention for the promotion of physical activity and nutrition behavior in the workplace context.

Ronald C Plotnikoff1, Linda J McCargar, Philip M Wilson, Constantinos A Loucaides.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate a 12-week workplace e-mail intervention designed to promote physical activity and nutrition behavior.
DESIGN: A pre- and post-test design was conducted to compare the effects of e-mail messages between intervention and control groups.
SETTING: Five large workplaces in Alberta, Canada.
SUBJECTS: Employees with access to a personal e-mail address (N = 2121) were randomly assigned to an intervention (n = 1566) or a control group (n = 555). INTERVENTION: Physical activity and nutrition messages were based on social-cognitive theories. The intervention group received one physical activity and one parallel nutrition message per week for 12 weeks. The control group received no weekly messages. MEASURES: Each participant completed self-report measures of physical activity and nutrition related to knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors 1 week before (time 1) and 1 week after (time 2) the intervention.
RESULTS: The intervention group was more efficacious at time 2 on measures of self-efficacy, pros, cons, intentions, and behavior related to physical activity. This group also reported more favorable changes in practicing healthy eating, balancing food intake with activity level, cooking meals with techniques to reduce fat, and avoiding eating high-fat foods. Effect sizes for all significant differences were small.
CONCLUSION: E-mail is a promising mode of delivery for promoting physical activity and nutrition in the workplace. Further theoretically driven studies are needed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16022206     DOI: 10.4278/0890-1171-19.6.422

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Health Promot        ISSN: 0890-1171


  41 in total

Review 1.  Current Science on Consumer Use of Mobile Health for Cardiovascular Disease Prevention: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.

Authors:  Lora E Burke; Jun Ma; Kristen M J Azar; Gary G Bennett; Eric D Peterson; Yaguang Zheng; William Riley; Janna Stephens; Svati H Shah; Brian Suffoletto; Tanya N Turan; Bonnie Spring; Julia Steinberger; Charlene C Quinn
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2015-08-13       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  A mixed methods evaluation of televised health promotion advertisements targeted at older adults.

Authors:  Tanya R Berry; John C Spence; Ronald C Plotnikoff; Adrian Bauman; Linda McCargar; Chad Witcher; Marianne Clark; Sean Stolp
Journal:  Eval Program Plann       Date:  2009-05-18

3.  Motivation, self-efficacy, physical activity and nutrition in college students: randomized controlled trial of an internet-based education program.

Authors:  Debra L Franko; Tara M Cousineau; Meredith Trant; Traci Craig Green; Diana Rancourt; Douglas Thompson; Jessica Ainscough; Laurie B Mintz; Michele Ciccazzo
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2008-06-28       Impact factor: 4.018

4.  Classification of individual well-being scores for the determination of adverse health and productivity outcomes in employee populations.

Authors:  Yuyan Shi; Lindsay E Sears; Carter R Coberley; James E Pope
Journal:  Popul Health Manag       Date:  2012-09-26       Impact factor: 2.459

5.  Physical activity information seeking and advertising recall.

Authors:  Tanya R Berry; John C Spence; Ronald C Plotnikoff; Adrian Bauman
Journal:  Health Commun       Date:  2011-04

6.  Brief self-efficacy scales for use in weight-loss trials: Preliminary evidence of validity.

Authors:  Kathryn E Wilson; Samantha M Harden; Fabio A Almeida; Wen You; Jennie L Hill; Cody Goessl; Paul A Estabrooks
Journal:  Psychol Assess       Date:  2015-11-30

Review 7.  Using electronic/computer interventions to promote physical activity.

Authors:  B H Marcus; J T Ciccolo; C N Sciamanna
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2008-12-03       Impact factor: 13.800

8.  Cost-effectiveness of interventions to promote physical activity: a modelling study.

Authors:  Linda J Cobiac; Theo Vos; Jan J Barendregt
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2009-07-14       Impact factor: 11.069

9.  Mediators of physical activity behaviour change among adult non-clinical populations: a review update.

Authors:  Ryan E Rhodes; Leila A Pfaeffli
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2010-05-11       Impact factor: 6.457

Review 10.  Periodic prompts and reminders in health promotion and health behavior interventions: systematic review.

Authors:  Jillian P Fry; Roni A Neff
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2009-05-14       Impact factor: 5.428

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.