Literature DB >> 16021365

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy after the learning curve: what should we expect?

M Misra1, J Schiff, G Rendon, J Rothschild, S Schwaitzberg.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The introduction of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) in the late 1980s was accompanied an increase in common bile duct (CBD) injuries. This retrospective analysis of 2,005 cholecystectomies performed at a single institution investigates the factors that have contributed to a record of zero CBD injuries in 1,674 consecutive LC.
METHODS: The medical records of 1,285 consecutive patients operated on from 7 July 1996 to 6 June 2003 were obtained. We also examined the peer review records of an additional 720 LC performed between 1 January 1990 and 7 July 1996.
RESULTS: There were no CBD injuries among 1,674 consecutive LC patients spanning the period since 1990. Of the 954 patients who underwent LC since 1996, six had a cystic duct leak and five had a duct of Luschka leak. Intraoperative cholangiography (IOC) was performed in 20.2% of cases (n = 193/954). Seventy of 157 patients who underwent cholangiography alone demonstrated one or more stones in the CBD (44.6%). In 40 patients (58.0%), endoscopic retrograde cholangio pancreatography (ERCP) was uniformly successful in clearing intraoperatively identified stones. In36.2% of cases, the stones were removed via laparoscopic CBD exploration (CBDE) (n = 25). In 5.8% of positive cases, the stones were removed via open CBDE (n = 4). Among 761 patients who did not undergo IOC, seven patients (0.92%) returned to the hospital for retained stones. Three of these patients had elevated liver function tests (LFT) preoperatively (1.3%) and four had normal LFT (1.1%).
CONCLUSIONS: Injuries of the CBD can be avoided by performing an extensive dissection of the triangle of Calot and by developing a critical view of the operative field to ensure the patient's safety during LC. If all LFT are normal and IOC is not performed, the occurrence of clinically significant stones postoperatively is minimal; in this group, only four patients had retained stones. Thus, in the face of normal LFT, routine IOC is unnecessary for a low CBD injury rate, and a return to the hospital for retained bile duct stones is rarely required, regardless of the number of times ductal stones are found on routine cholangiography. This implies that the significance of the stones discovered at IOC is questionable in most cases, thereby providing an argument against routine cholangiography. Most discovered CBD stones can be treated by ERCP, thus obviating the need for the T-tube drainage associated with CBDE. The 21st century finds LC to be a mature and safe surgical procedure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16021365     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-004-8919-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  18 in total

1.  Is intraoperative cholangiography during laparoscopic cholecystectomy cost effective?

Authors:  Y D Podnos; D V Gelfand; T S Dulkanchainun; S E Wilson; S Cao; P Ji; J A Ortiz; D K Imagawa
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 2.565

2.  Major bile duct injuries associated with laparoscopic cholecystectomy: effect of surgical repair on quality of life.

Authors:  Genevieve B Melton; Keith D Lillemoe; John L Cameron; Patricia A Sauter; JoAnn Coleman; Charles J Yeo
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 3.  Causes and prevention of laparoscopic bile duct injuries: analysis of 252 cases from a human factors and cognitive psychology perspective.

Authors:  Lawrence W Way; Lygia Stewart; Walter Gantert; Kingsway Liu; Crystine M Lee; Karen Whang; John G Hunter
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  A prospective study of common bile duct calculi in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy: natural history of choledocholithiasis revisited.

Authors:  Chris Collins; Donal Maguire; Adrian Ireland; Edward Fitzgerald; Gerald C O'Sullivan
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 5.  Bile duct injury after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The United States experience.

Authors:  B V MacFadyen; R Vecchio; A E Ricardo; C R Mathis
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 6.  National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference Statement on Gallstones and Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy.

Authors: 
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 2.565

7.  Common bile duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy and the use of intraoperative cholangiography: adverse outcome or preventable error?

Authors:  D R Flum; T Koepsell; P Heagerty; M Sinanan; E P Dellinger
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2001-11

8.  A risk score for conversion from laparoscopic to open cholecystectomy.

Authors:  N A Kama; M Kologlu; M Doganay; E Reis; M Atli; M Dolapci
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 2.565

9.  Mortality and complications associated with laparoscopic cholecystectomy. A meta-analysis.

Authors:  J A Shea; M J Healey; J A Berlin; J R Clarke; P F Malet; R N Staroscik; J S Schwartz; S V Williams
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Complications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in Switzerland. A prospective 3-year study of 10,174 patients. Swiss Association of Laparoscopic and Thoracoscopic Surgery.

Authors:  K Z'graggen; H Wehrli; A Metzger; M Buehler; E Frei; C Klaiber
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 4.584

View more
  19 in total

Review 1.  What is the duct of Luschka?--A systematic review.

Authors:  Thomas Schnelldorfer; Michael G Sarr; David B Adams
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2012-01-04       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  Financial modeling of current surgical robotic system in outpatient laparoscopic cholecystectomy: how should we think about the expense?

Authors:  S D Schwaitzberg
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-08-15       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  The "inside approach of the gallbladder" is an alternative to the classic Calot's triangle dissection for a safe operation in severe cholecystitis.

Authors:  Catherine Hubert; Laurence Annet; Bernard E van Beers; Jean-François Gigot
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-03-25       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 4.  Bile leaks from the duct of Luschka (subvesical duct): a review.

Authors:  Constantine P Spanos; Theodore Syrakos
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2006-08-23       Impact factor: 3.445

5.  Anatomic landmarks: their usefulness in safe laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  K Singh; A Ohri
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-09-23       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Management of preoperatively suspected choledocholithiasis: a decision analysis.

Authors:  Bilal Kharbutli; Vic Velanovich
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2008-08-06       Impact factor: 3.452

7.  Experimental trial of transvaginal cholecystectomy: an ex vivo analysis of the learning process for a novel single-port technique.

Authors:  F C Becerra Garcia; M C Misra; H K Bhattacharjee; G Buess
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-01-01       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Single-setting endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and cholecystectomy improve the rate of surgical site infection.

Authors:  Michele M Loor; Jean Dominique Morancy; James K Glover; Gregory J Beilman; Catherine L Statz
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-05-10       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: first, do no harm; second, take care of bile duct stones.

Authors:  George Berci; John Hunter; Leon Morgenstern; Maurice Arregui; Michael Brunt; Brandon Carroll; Michael Edye; David Fermelia; George Ferzli; Frederick Greene; Joseph Petelin; Edward Phillips; Jeffrey Ponsky; Harry Sax; Steven Schwaitzberg; Nathaniel Soper; Lee Swanstrom; William Traverso
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-01-26       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 10.  Porcelain gallbladder: a benign process or concern for malignancy?

Authors:  Thomas Schnelldorfer
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2013-02-20       Impact factor: 3.452

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.