Literature DB >> 16020558

Gastric cancer staging at multi-detector row CT gastrography: comparison of transverse and volumetric CT scanning.

Hye Jin Kim1, Ah Young Kim, Seong Tae Oh, Jung-Sun Kim, Kyoung Won Kim, Pyo Nyun Kim, Moon-Gue Lee, Hyun Kwon Ha.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To prospectively evaluate the accuracy of multi-detector row computed tomography (CT) gastrography for preoperative staging of gastric cancer, with pathologic and surgical results as the reference standard.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was approved by the institutional review board, and patients gave written informed consent. One hundred six patients (72 male, 34 female; mean age, 56 years) with endoscopically proved gastric cancer underwent unenhanced and contrast material-enhanced multi-detector row CT gastrography, with effervescent granules used as oral contrast material. Two experienced radiologists independently evaluated the depth of tumor invasion into the gastric wall (tumor staging), the involvement of regional lymph nodes (nodal staging), and the presence or absence of metastasis (metastatic staging) on transverse and volumetric CT images, which included images produced with multiplanar reformation and a virtual endoscopic technique. TNM staging of each tumor was compared with the pathologic and surgical results. Diagnostic accuracy in TNM staging was analyzed.
RESULTS: Gastric cancer was detected in 92 (87%) of 106 study patients with transverse CT imaging and in 104 (98%) with volumetric CT imaging. The overall accuracy of the tumor staging was 77% with transverse CT imaging and 84% with volumetric CT imaging (P < .001). The overall accuracy for lymph node staging was 62% with transverse CT imaging and 64% with volumetric CT imaging (P = .057). For staging of metastases, there was no difference between transverse and volumetric CT imaging (86% for both) (P > .99).
CONCLUSION: Multi-detector row CT gastrography with multiplanar reformation and virtual endoscopy, compared with transverse CT imaging, can improve the accuracy of preoperative staging of gastric cancer. This difference was significant for tumor staging but not for the staging of lymph nodes and metastases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16020558     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2363041101

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  71 in total

1.  Medical image analysis: computer-aided diagnosis of gastric cancer invasion on endoscopic images.

Authors:  Keisuke Kubota; Junko Kuroda; Masashi Yoshida; Keiichiro Ohta; Masaki Kitajima
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-11-15       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Intraoperative portable abdominal radiograph for tumor localization: a simple and accurate method for laparoscopic gastrectomy.

Authors:  Hyoung-Il Kim; Woo Jin Hyung; Cho Rok Lee; Joon Seok Lim; Ji Yeong An; Jae-Ho Cheong; Seung Ho Choi; Sung Hoon Noh
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-08-20       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Has the accuracy of preoperative diagnosis improved in cases of early-stage gastric cancer?

Authors:  Hironori Tsujimoto; Hidekazu Sugasawa; Satoshi Ono; Takashi Ichikura; Junji Yamamoto; Kazuo Hase
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Adrenal gland volume measurement in septic shock and control patients: a pilot study.

Authors:  Stephanie Nougaret; B Jung; S Aufort; G Chanques; S Jaber; B Gallix
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-06-04       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Pre-operative lymph node status of gastric cancer evaluated by multidetector computed tomography.

Authors:  Min Wang; Yanwei Ye; Qing Yang; Jingjing Li; Chao Han; Wei Wang; Chunlin Zhao; Jianguo Wen
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-10-15

6.  Evaluation of miR-29c, miR-124, miR-135a and miR-148a in predicting lymph node metastasis and tumor stage of gastric cancer.

Authors:  Li Liu; Jia-Xiang Ye; Yu-Zhou Qin; Qi-Huang Chen; Lian-Ying Ge
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-12-15

7.  F18-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography and computed tomography is not accurate in preoperative staging of gastric cancer.

Authors:  Tae Kyung Ha; Yun Young Choi; Soon Young Song; Sung Joon Kwon
Journal:  J Korean Surg Soc       Date:  2011-08-03

Review 8.  Imaging in assessing lymph node status in gastric cancer.

Authors:  Robert Michael Kwee; Thomas Christian Kwee
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2009-04-24       Impact factor: 7.370

9.  CT gastrography "wall-carving technique" of gastric cancer: impact of contrast enhancement based on layer depth.

Authors:  Daisuke Tsurumaru; Yusuke Nishimuta; Toshio Muraki; Yoshiki Asayama; Akihiro Nishie; Eiji Oki; Hiroshi Honda
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2019-06-08       Impact factor: 2.374

10.  Diagnostic performance of 64-MDCT and 1.5-T MRI with high-resolution sequences in the T staging of gastric cancer: a comparative analysis with histopathology.

Authors:  M Anzidei; A Napoli; F Zaccagna; P Di Paolo; C Zini; B Cavallo Marincola; D Geiger; C Catalano; R Passariello
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2009-09-22       Impact factor: 3.469

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.