Literature DB >> 16019759

Prognostic value of serum markers for prostate cancer.

Ulf-Håkan Stenman1, Per-Anders Abrahamsson, Gunnar Aus, Hans Lilja, Chris Bangma, Freddie C Hamdy, Laurent Boccon-Gibod, Peter Ekman.   

Abstract

The incidence of prostate cancer has increased dramatically during the last 10-15 years and it is now the commonest cancer in males in developed countries. The increase is mainly caused by the increasing use of opportunistic screening or case-finding based on the use of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing in serum. With this approach, prostate cancer is detected 5-10 years before giving rise to symptoms and on average 17 years before causing the death of the patient. While this has led to detection of prostate cancer at a potentially curable stage, it has also led to substantial overdiagnosis, i.e. detection of cancers that would not surface clinically in the absence of screening. A major challenge is thus to identify the cases that need to be treated while avoiding diagnosing patients who will not benefit from being diagnosed and who will only suffer from the stigma of being a cancer patient. It would be useful to have prognostic markers that could predict which patients need to be diagnosed and which do not. Ideally, it should be possible to measure these markers using non-invasive techniques, i.e. by means of serum or urine tests. As it is very useful for both early diagnosis and monitoring of prostate cancer, PSA is considered the most valuable marker available for any tumor. Although the prognostic value of PSA is limited, measurement of the proportion of free PSA has improved the identification of patients with aggressive disease. Furthermore, the rate of increase in serum PSA reflects tumor growth rate and prognosis but, due to substantial physiological variation in serum PSA, reliable estimation of the rate of PSA increase requires follow-up for at least 2 years. Algorithms based on the combined use of free and total PSA and prostate volume in logistic regression and neural networks can improve the diagnostic accuracy for prostate cancer, and assays for minor subfractions of PSA and other new markers may provide additional prognostic information. Markers of neuroendocrine differentiation are useful for the monitoring of androgen-independent disease and various bone markers are useful in patients with metastatic disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16019759     DOI: 10.1080/03008880510030941

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scand J Urol Nephrol Suppl        ISSN: 0300-8886


  14 in total

1.  Replacement of the Disulfide Bridge in a KLK3-Stimulating Peptide Using Orthogonally Protected Building Blocks.

Authors:  Kristian Meinander; Miikka Pakkala; Janne Weisell; Ulf-Håkan Stenman; Hannu Koistinen; Ale Närvänen; Erik A A Wallén
Journal:  ACS Med Chem Lett       Date:  2013-12-16       Impact factor: 4.345

2.  Combination of vitamin E and selenium causes an induction of apoptosis of human prostate cancer cells by enhancing Bax/Bcl-2 ratio.

Authors:  Shannon Reagan-Shaw; Minakshi Nihal; Haseeb Ahsan; Hasan Mukhtar; Nihal Ahmad
Journal:  Prostate       Date:  2008-11-01       Impact factor: 4.104

3.  Investigative clinical study on prostate cancer: on the role of the pretreatment total PSA to free testosterone ratio in selecting different biology groups of prostate cancer patients.

Authors:  Antonio B Porcaro; Filippo Migliorini; Mario Romano; Aldo Petrozziello; Stefano Zecchini Antoniolli; Emanuele Rubilotta; Vincenzo Lacola; Teodoro Sava; Claudio Ghimenton; Beatrice Caruso; Carmelo Monaco; Luigi Comunale
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2009-11-10       Impact factor: 2.370

4.  Long-term assessment of prostate cancer progression free survival: evaluation of pathological parameters, nuclear shape and molecular biomarkers of pathogenesis.

Authors:  Robert W Veltri; Sumit Isharwal; M Craig Miller; Jonathan I Epstein; Leslie A Mangold; Elizabeth Humphreys; Alan W Partin
Journal:  Prostate       Date:  2008-12-01       Impact factor: 4.104

Review 5.  Lung cancer screening with CT.

Authors:  Denise R Aberle; Kathleen Brown
Journal:  Clin Chest Med       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 2.878

6.  Simultaneous Measurements of Follicle Stimulating Hormone and Total Testosterone and Associations in Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Antonio B Porcaro; Salvatore Siracusano; Nicolò de Luyk; Paolo Corsi; Marco Sebben; Alessandro Tafuri; Tania Processali; Davide Inverardi; Giovanni Cacciamani; Daniele Mattevi; Maria A Cerruto; Matteo Brunelli; Claudio Ghimenton; Carmelo Monaco; Walter Artibani
Journal:  Curr Urol       Date:  2017-10-22

7.  Incidental detection of prostate-specific antigen-negative metastatic prostate cancer initially presented with solitary pulmonary nodule on fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography.

Authors:  Ezgi Basak Erdogan; Nur Buyukpinarbasili; Sedat Ziyade; Tolga Akman; Haci Mehmet Turk; Mehmet Aydin
Journal:  Indian J Nucl Med       Date:  2015 Jul-Sep

8.  Prostate specific antigen for early detection of prostate cancer: longitudinal study.

Authors:  Benny Holmström; Mattias Johansson; Anders Bergh; Ulf-Håkan Stenman; Göran Hallmans; Pär Stattin
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2009-09-24

Review 9.  Active surveillance for prostate cancer: a narrative review of clinical guidelines.

Authors:  Sophie M Bruinsma; Chris H Bangma; Peter R Carroll; Michael S Leapman; Antti Rannikko; Neophytos Petrides; Mahesha Weerakoon; Leonard P Bokhorst; Monique J Roobol
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2016-01-27       Impact factor: 14.432

10.  Validation of algorithms to detect distant metastases in men with prostate cancer using routine registry data in Denmark.

Authors:  Vera Ehrenstein; Rohini K Hernandez; Merete Lund Maegbaek; Johnny Kahlert; Mary Nguyen-Nielsen; Mette Nørgaard; Alexander Liede
Journal:  Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2015-04-10       Impact factor: 4.790

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.