Literature DB >> 16018241

The relationship of clinical response, oocyte number, and success in oocyte donor cycles.

Gerard Letterie1, Lorna Marshall, Marlane Angle.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of the study was to determine if there is a threshold of clinical response to ovarian stimulation below which pregnancy rates diminish in oocyte donation cycles.
METHODS: Two hundred and seventy-six oocyte donor cycles were reviewed. Data were stratified by number of oocytes retrieved and divided into pregnant versus non-pregnant outcomes.
RESULTS: There were no differences in fertilization rates or clinical pregnancy rates regardless of the number of oocytes retrieved ranging from 3 to > 25. There was no difference in the mean age of the donors in pregnant versus non-pregnant cycles.
CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that a lower threshold below which cycle cancellation should be considered donation cycles is different than standard IVF.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16018241      PMCID: PMC3455175          DOI: 10.1007/s10815-005-4875-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet        ISSN: 1058-0468            Impact factor:   3.412


  8 in total

1.  Money, morals and medical risks: conflicting notions underlying the recruitment of egg donors.

Authors:  K K Ahuja; E G Simons; R G Edwards
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 6.918

2.  Clinical outcomes among recipients of donated eggs: an analysis of the U.S. national experience, 1996-1998.

Authors:  James P Toner; David A Grainger; Linda M Frazier
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 7.329

3.  Oocyte donor selection from 554 candidates.

Authors:  S Marina; R Expósito; F Marina; J Nadal; M Masramón; A Vergés
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 6.918

4.  Egg-sharing in assisted conception: ethical and practical considerations.

Authors:  K K Ahuja; E G Simons; W Fiamanya; M Dalton; N A Armar; P Kirkpatrick; S Sharp; M Arian-Schad; A Seaton; W J Watters
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 6.918

5.  Obstetric outcome in 232 ovum donation pregnancies.

Authors:  H I Abdalla; A Billett; A K Kan; S Baig; M Wren; L Korea; J W Studd
Journal:  Br J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  1998-03

6.  The impact of an egg donor's age and her prior fertility on recipient pregnancy outcome.

Authors:  B M Faber; R Mercan; P Hamacher; S J Muasher; J P Toner
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 7.329

7.  Outcome for donors and recipients in two egg-sharing policies.

Authors:  Efstratios M Kolibianakis; Herman Tournaye; Kaan Osmanagaoglu; Michel Camus; Linda Van Waesberghe; Andre Van Steirteghem; Paul Devroey
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 7.329

8.  The evolution and outcome of pregnancies from oocyte donation.

Authors:  G Pados; M Camus; A Van Steirteghem; M Bonduelle; P Devroey
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 6.918

  8 in total
  3 in total

1.  A shared egg donor program: which is the minimum number of oocytes to be allocated?

Authors:  Demian Glujovsky; Marcelo Dominguez; Gabriel Fiszbajn; Sergio Papier; Mariano Lavolpe; Carlos Sueldo
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2010-11-19       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Total number of oocytes and zygotes are predictive of live birth pregnancy in fresh donor oocyte in vitro fertilization cycles.

Authors:  Eduardo Hariton; Keewan Kim; Sunni L Mumford; Marissa Palmor; Pietro Bortoletto; Eden R Cardozo; Anatte E Karmon; Mary E Sabatini; Aaron K Styer
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2017-06-07       Impact factor: 7.329

3.  Effect of oocyte donor stimulation on recipient outcomes: data from a US national donor oocyte bank.

Authors:  H S Hipp; A J Gaskins; Z P Nagy; S M Capelouto; D B Shapiro; J B Spencer
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2020-04-28       Impact factor: 6.918

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.