Literature DB >> 16015031

The posterior probability of linkage allowing for linkage disequilibrium and a new estimate of disequilibrium between a trait and a marker.

Xinqun Yang1, Jian Huang, Mark W Logue, Veronica J Vieland.   

Abstract

The posterior probability of linkage (PPL) statistic has been developed as a method for the rigorous accumulation of evidence for or against linkage allowing for both intra- and inter-sample heterogeneity. To date, the method has assumed linkage equilibrium between alleles at the trait locus and the marker locus. We now generalize the PPL to allow for linkage disequilibrium (LD), by incorporating variable phase probabilities into the underlying linkage likelihood. This enables us to recover the marginal posterior density of the recombination fraction, integrating out nuisance parameters of the trait model, including the locus heterogeneity (admixture) parameter, as well as a vector of LD parameters. The marginal posterior density can then be updated across data subsets or new data as they become available, while allowing parameters of the trait model to vary between data sets. The method applies immediately to general pedigree structures and to markers with multiple alleles. In the case of SNPs, the likelihood is parameterized in terms of the standard single LD parameter D'; and it therefore affords a mechanism for estimation of D' between the marker and the trait, again, without fixing the parameters of the trait model and allowing for updating across data sets. It is even possible to allow for a different associated allele in different populations, while accumulating information regarding the strength of LD. While a computationally efficient implementation for multi-allelic markers is still in progress, we have implemented a version of this new LD-PPL for SNPs and evaluated its performance in nuclear families. Our simulations show that LD-PPLs tend to be larger than PPLs (stronger evidence in favor of linkage/LD) with increased LD level, under a variety of generating models; while in the absence of linkage and LD, LD-PPLs tend to be smaller than PPLs (stronger evidence against linkage). The estimate of D' also behaves well even in relatively small, heterogeneous samples. Copyright 2005 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16015031     DOI: 10.1159/000086699

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Hered        ISSN: 0001-5652            Impact factor:   0.444


  13 in total

1.  Fast and accurate calculation of a computationally intensive statistic for mapping disease genes.

Authors:  Sang-Cheol Seok; Michael Evans; Veronica J Vieland
Journal:  J Comput Biol       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 1.479

2.  Practical considerations for dividing data into subsets prior to PPL analysis.

Authors:  M Govil; V J Vieland
Journal:  Hum Hered       Date:  2008-07-09       Impact factor: 0.444

3.  Modeling linkage disequilibrium in exact linkage computations: a comparison of first-order Markov approaches and the clustered-markers approach.

Authors:  Cornelis A Albers; Hilbert J Kappen
Journal:  BMC Proc       Date:  2007-12-18

4.  A genome scan for loci shared by autism spectrum disorder and language impairment.

Authors:  Christopher W Bartlett; Liping Hou; Judy F Flax; Abby Hare; Soo Yeon Cheong; Zena Fermano; Barbie Zimmerman-Bier; Charles Cartwright; Marco A Azaro; Steven Buyske; Linda M Brzustowicz
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 18.112

5.  A pure likelihood approach to the analysis of genetic association data: an alternative to Bayesian and frequentist analysis.

Authors:  Lisa J Strug; Susan E Hodge; Theodore Chiang; Deb K Pal; Paul N Corey; Charles Rohde
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2010-04-28       Impact factor: 4.246

6.  Increasing genotype-phenotype model determinism: application to bivariate reading/language traits and epistatic interactions in language-impaired families.

Authors:  Tabatha R Simmons; Judy F Flax; Marco A Azaro; Jared E Hayter; Laura M Justice; Stephen A Petrill; Anne S Bassett; Paula Tallal; Linda M Brzustowicz; Christopher W Bartlett
Journal:  Hum Hered       Date:  2010-10-14       Impact factor: 0.444

7.  Novel susceptibility locus at chromosome 6q16.3-22.31 in a family with GEFS+.

Authors:  A Poduri; Y Wang; D Gordon; S Barral-Rodriguez; C Barker-Cummings; A Ulgen; V Chitsazzadeh; R S Hill; N Risch; W A Hauser; T A Pedley; C A Walsh; R Ottman
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2009-10-20       Impact factor: 9.910

8.  Identification of a schizophrenia-associated functional noncoding variant in NOS1AP.

Authors:  Naomi S Wratten; Holly Memoli; Yungui Huang; Anna M Dulencin; Paul G Matteson; Michelle A Cornacchia; Marco A Azaro; Jaime Messenger; Jared E Hayter; Anne S Bassett; Steven Buyske; James H Millonig; Veronica J Vieland; Linda M Brzustowicz
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  2009-03-02       Impact factor: 18.112

9.  Combined linkage and linkage disequilibrium analysis of a motor speech phenotype within families ascertained for autism risk loci.

Authors:  Judy F Flax; Abby Hare; Marco A Azaro; Veronica J Vieland; Linda M Brzustowicz
Journal:  J Neurodev Disord       Date:  2010-10-12       Impact factor: 4.025

10.  Novel method for combined linkage and genome-wide association analysis finds evidence of distinct genetic architecture for two subtypes of autism.

Authors:  Veronica J Vieland; Joachim Hallmayer; Yungui Huang; Alistair T Pagnamenta; Dalila Pinto; Hameed Khan; Anthony P Monaco; Andrew D Paterson; Stephen W Scherer; James S Sutcliffe; Peter Szatmari
Journal:  J Neurodev Disord       Date:  2011-01-19       Impact factor: 4.025

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.