Literature DB >> 16012657

How can intracranial recordings assist MEG source localization?

E Halgren1.   

Abstract

MEG/EEG are the only non-invasive methods to instantaneously and directly measure the currents underlying cerebral information processing, but their ability to localize those currents is limited. Source localization from MEG is always uncertain, unless the signal is already known to be coming exclusively from a single focal source, or a few highly separated focal sources. Furthermore, since many cerebral currents produce little or no MEG signal, even accurate localization of the MEG sources may provide a very incomplete map of brain activation. Intracranial EEG (iEEG) can unambiguously localize sources, using steep voltage gradients, doubly-inverting gradients, traverses of the source structure from multiple directions, and/or spatial arrays of microelectrodes. These recordings show that except for a few milliseconds after the first cortical sensory response, multiple overlapping sources are active. For the commonly-studied cognitive potential components, N400 and P3b, iEEG demonstrates distributed sources in multiple lobes with similar time-courses. These data, as well as basic cortical neurophysiology from animal studies, do not support the common assumptions that the MEG generating sources are focal, and/or independent. Although focal hemodynamic activation is often described, this may be an artefact of the usual data analysis schemes. In summary, MEG source localization depends on prior assumptions of unknown accuracy, and MEG is insensitive to much cerebral activity. MEG publications should explicitly acknowledge these limitations. If possible, reference should be made to more certain knowledge, which in some cases includes iEEG.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 16012657

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurol Clin Neurophysiol        ISSN: 1526-8748


  10 in total

1.  Source cancellation profiles of electroencephalography and magnetoencephalography.

Authors:  Andrei Irimia; John Darrell Van Horn; Eric Halgren
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2011-09-18       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  Generators of the intracranial P50 response in auditory sensory gating.

Authors:  Oleg Korzyukov; Mark E Pflieger; Michael Wagner; Susan M Bowyer; T Rosburg; Karthik Sundaresan; Christian Erich Elger; Nashaat N Boutros
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2006-12-19       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  Multimodal imaging of repetition priming: Using fMRI, MEG, and intracranial EEG to reveal spatiotemporal profiles of word processing.

Authors:  Carrie R McDonald; Thomas Thesen; Chad Carlson; Mark Blumberg; Holly M Girard; Amy Trongnetrpunya; Jason S Sherfey; Orrin Devinsky; Rubin Kuzniecky; Werner K Dolye; Sydney S Cash; Matthew K Leonard; Donald J Hagler; Anders M Dale; Eric Halgren
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2010-07-08       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  MEG in the macaque monkey and human: distinguishing cortical fields in space and time.

Authors:  Johanna M Zumer; Srikantan S Nagarajan; Leah A Krubitzer; Zhao Zhu; Robert S Turner; Elizabeth A Disbrow
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2010-05-20       Impact factor: 3.252

Review 5.  The use of neuroimaging to study behavior in patients with epilepsy.

Authors:  Carrie R McDonald
Journal:  Epilepsy Behav       Date:  2007-12-19       Impact factor: 2.937

Review 6.  Brain development during the preschool years.

Authors:  Timothy T Brown; Terry L Jernigan
Journal:  Neuropsychol Rev       Date:  2012-09-25       Impact factor: 7.444

7.  Cancellation of EEG and MEG signals generated by extended and distributed sources.

Authors:  Seppo P Ahlfors; Jooman Han; Fa-Hsuan Lin; Thomas Witzel; John W Belliveau; Matti S Hämäläinen; Eric Halgren
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 5.038

8.  Widespread Brain Areas Engaged during a Classical Auditory Streaming Task Revealed by Intracranial EEG.

Authors:  Andrew R Dykstra; Eric Halgren; Thomas Thesen; Chad E Carlson; Werner Doyle; Joseph R Madsen; Emad N Eskandar; Sydney S Cash
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2011-08-03       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  Neural Correlates of Auditory Perceptual Awareness and Release from Informational Masking Recorded Directly from Human Cortex: A Case Study.

Authors:  Andrew R Dykstra; Eric Halgren; Alexander Gutschalk; Emad N Eskandar; Sydney S Cash
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2016-10-20       Impact factor: 4.677

10.  Determining surgical candidacy in temporal lobe epilepsy.

Authors:  Alireza Mansouri; Aria Fallah; Taufik A Valiante
Journal:  Epilepsy Res Treat       Date:  2012-02-21
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.