Literature DB >> 1601191

Correlates of successful hearing aid use in older adults.

C D Mulrow1, M R Tuley, C Aguilar.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether age, education, functional handicap, degree of hearing loss, amount of hearing and speech recognition gain achieved with hearing aid, locus of control, visual acuity, manual dexterity, number of comorbid diseases, and number of medications predict which elderly individuals with hearing loss are likely to benefit from hearing aids.
DESIGN: A logistic regression prediction model for hearing aid benefit was developed on a training set of 89 individuals and verified in a test set of 87 individuals. Hearing aid success was assessed 4 mo after hearing aid adminstration. It was defined by assessing hearing aid satisfaction, functional handicap change post-hearing aid, and number of hours of weekly hearing aid use.
SETTING: All patients were elderly male veterans from the Audie L. Murphy Memorial Veterans Hospital. There were no differences in demographic or clinical characteristics in training versus test set individuals.
RESULTS: Several variables, including baseline perceived functional handicap, education, number of medications, and age correlated with individual success measures. However, no variables consistently correlated with all success measures. The accuracy of prediction rules for success utilizing the variables ranged from 75 to 88% in the training set, and 54 to 84% in the test set.
CONCLUSION: Although certain baseline factors were statistically significantly related to individual measures of successful hearing aid use, no factors were good enough to consistently differentiate successful from unsuccessful hearing aid candidates.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1601191     DOI: 10.1097/00003446-199204000-00007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ear Hear        ISSN: 0196-0202            Impact factor:   3.570


  18 in total

1.  The WHO-DAS II: measuring outcomes of hearing aid intervention for adults.

Authors:  Rachel McArdle; Theresa H Chisolm; Harvey B Abrams; Richard H Wilson; Patrick J Doyle
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2005

Review 2.  Effects of age on auditory and cognitive processing: implications for hearing aid fitting and audiologic rehabilitation.

Authors:  M Kathleen Pichora-Fuller; Gurjit Singh
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2006-03

3.  Outcome measures in the hearing aid fitting/selection process.

Authors:  B E Weinstein
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  1997-12

4.  Clinical predictors for satisfaction with incus vibroplasty: a preliminary study.

Authors:  Jae Joon Han; Jihye Rhee; Jae-Jin Song; Ja-Won Koo; Byung Yoon Choi
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2017-12-05       Impact factor: 2.503

5.  Management of hearing aid assembly by urban-dwelling hearing-impaired adults in a developed country: implications for a self-fitting hearing aid.

Authors:  Elizabeth Convery; Gitte Keidser; Lisa Hartley; Andrea Caposecco; Louise Hickson; Carly Meyer
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2011-12-26

Review 6.  Factors influencing help seeking, hearing aid uptake, hearing aid use and satisfaction with hearing aids: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Line Vestergaard Knudsen; Marie Oberg; Claus Nielsen; Graham Naylor; Sophia E Kramer
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2010-09

7.  Hearing aid use among older U.S. adults; the national health and nutrition examination survey, 2005-2006 and 2009-2010.

Authors:  Kathleen E Bainbridge; Virginia Ramachandran
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2014 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

8.  Satisfaction and compliance of adult patients using hearing aid and evaluation of factors affecting them.

Authors:  Mehmet Hakan Korkmaz; Ömer Bayır; Serap Er; Eray Işık; Güleser Saylam; Emel Çadallı Tatar; Ali Özdek
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-04-19       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 9.  Factors involved in access and utilization of adult hearing healthcare: A systematic review.

Authors:  Margaret Barnett; Brian Hixon; Neville Okwiri; Catherine Irungu; John Ayugi; Robin Thompson; Jennifer B Shinn; Matthew L Bush
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2016-08-22       Impact factor: 3.325

10.  Changes in Psychosocial Measures After a 6-Week Field Trial.

Authors:  Jamie L Desjardins; Karen A Doherty
Journal:  Am J Audiol       Date:  2017-06-13       Impact factor: 1.493

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.