OBJECTIVE: To assess whether nonelevated cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) markers could delineate inactive AIDS dementia complex (ADC) in patients receiving highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART), using neuropsychologic performance change as an indicator of ADC stability. METHODS: We used data from the abacavir (ABC) ADC trial (n = 78) and examined the patients' neuropsychologic performance change with the Reliable Change Index according to 3 cutoff groups: (1) CSF viral load (VL) <100 copies/mL, (2) CSF beta-2 microglobulin (beta2m) <2.2 mg/L, and (3) CSF VL and CSF beta2m below cutoffs. RESULTS: CSF marker cutoff groups did not define neuropsychologic change. Linear regression showed that only CSF VL was a weak predictor of neuropsychologic performance change. CONCLUSION: HAART-treated ADC patients with baseline CSF markers of viral and immunologic inactivity did not necessarily have inactive ADC when followed over 12 weeks. More sensitive CSF markers to judge the activity of ADC are urgently needed, whereas the interpretation of these markers should be considered with caution in HAART-treated ADC patients.
OBJECTIVE: To assess whether nonelevated cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) markers could delineate inactive AIDS dementia complex (ADC) in patients receiving highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART), using neuropsychologic performance change as an indicator of ADC stability. METHODS: We used data from the abacavir (ABC) ADC trial (n = 78) and examined the patients' neuropsychologic performance change with the Reliable Change Index according to 3 cutoff groups: (1) CSF viral load (VL) <100 copies/mL, (2) CSF beta-2 microglobulin (beta2m) <2.2 mg/L, and (3) CSF VL and CSF beta2m below cutoffs. RESULTS: CSF marker cutoff groups did not define neuropsychologic change. Linear regression showed that only CSF VL was a weak predictor of neuropsychologic performance change. CONCLUSION: HAART-treated ADC patients with baseline CSF markers of viral and immunologic inactivity did not necessarily have inactive ADC when followed over 12 weeks. More sensitive CSF markers to judge the activity of ADC are urgently needed, whereas the interpretation of these markers should be considered with caution in HAART-treated ADC patients.
Authors: James T Becker; Melissa Fabrizio; Gustavo Sudre; Anna Haridis; Timothy Ambrose; Howard J Aizenstein; William Eddy; Oscar L Lopez; David A Wolk; Lauri Parkkonen; Anto Bagic Journal: J Neurosci Methods Date: 2012-03-05 Impact factor: 2.390
Authors: Gurudutt Pendyala; Elizabeth J Want; William Webb; Gary Siuzdak; Howard S Fox Journal: J Neuroimmune Pharmacol Date: 2006-10-10 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Lucette A Cysique; Scott L Letendre; Christopher Ake; Hua Jin; Donald R Franklin; Saurabh Gupta; Chuan Shi; Xin Yu; Zunyou Wu; Ian S Abramson; Igor Grant; Robert K Heaton Journal: AIDS Date: 2010-04-24 Impact factor: 4.177
Authors: Sarah E Beck; Suzanne E Queen; Kenneth W Witwer; Kelly A Metcalf Pate; Lisa M Mangus; Lucio Gama; Robert J Adams; Janice E Clements; M Christine Zink; Joseph L Mankowski Journal: Eur J Pharmacol Date: 2015-03-24 Impact factor: 4.432
Authors: Andrew J Levine; Steve Horvath; Eric N Miller; Elyse J Singer; Paul Shapshak; Gayle C Baldwin; Otoniel Martínez-Maza; Mallory D Witt; Peter Langfelder Journal: J Neuroimmunol Date: 2013-09-26 Impact factor: 3.478
Authors: Linda Chang; Gene-Jack Wang; Nora D Volkow; Thomas Ernst; Frank Telang; Jean Logan; Joanna S Fowler Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2008-05-20 Impact factor: 6.556