BACKGROUND: Contrast-enhanced MR angiography (CE-MRA) using a combined head and neck coil permits non-invasive imaging of the vasculature from the aortic arch through to the Circle of Willis in less than 2 minutes. OBJECTIVE: To determine the accuracy of CE-MRA for the detection of vascular pathology, in particular vascular stenoses, using digital subtraction angiography (DSA) as the gold standard. METHODS: In a prospective study of 81 patients referred for DSA, CE-MRA and DSA studies were performed within 72 hours of each other. CE-MRA was performed on a 1.5 Tesla clinical MRI scanner using a five-channel neurovascular array (head and neck coil), with dynamic tracking of the IV gadolinium bolus. CE-MRAs and DSA films were read by two interventional neuroradiologists blinded to the clinical presentation of the patient. RESULTS: On DSA, there were 77 vascular stenoses > or =50% identified, 51 extracranial and 26 intracranial. The overall sensitivity of CE-MRA using the neurovascular array for the detection of vascular stenoses > or =50% was 57% (95% CI: 46 to 68%) with a specificity of 98% (97 to 99%). The sensitivity for the detection of extracranial vascular stenoses > or =50% was 82% (72 to 93%) with a specificity of 97% (96 to 98%). However, the sensitivity for the detection of intracranial vascular stenoses > or =50% was only 8% (0 to 18%), with a specificity of 99% (98 to 100%). CONCLUSIONS: At this stage Contrast-enhanced MR angiography using a neurovascular coil shows promise as a rapid, specific, and noninvasive screening method for extracranial vascular disease, but not for intracranial vascular disease.
BACKGROUND: Contrast-enhanced MR angiography (CE-MRA) using a combined head and neck coil permits non-invasive imaging of the vasculature from the aortic arch through to the Circle of Willis in less than 2 minutes. OBJECTIVE: To determine the accuracy of CE-MRA for the detection of vascular pathology, in particular vascular stenoses, using digital subtraction angiography (DSA) as the gold standard. METHODS: In a prospective study of 81 patients referred for DSA, CE-MRA and DSA studies were performed within 72 hours of each other. CE-MRA was performed on a 1.5 Tesla clinical MRI scanner using a five-channel neurovascular array (head and neck coil), with dynamic tracking of the IV gadolinium bolus. CE-MRAs and DSA films were read by two interventional neuroradiologists blinded to the clinical presentation of the patient. RESULTS: On DSA, there were 77 vascular stenoses > or =50% identified, 51 extracranial and 26 intracranial. The overall sensitivity of CE-MRA using the neurovascular array for the detection of vascular stenoses > or =50% was 57% (95% CI: 46 to 68%) with a specificity of 98% (97 to 99%). The sensitivity for the detection of extracranial vascular stenoses > or =50% was 82% (72 to 93%) with a specificity of 97% (96 to 98%). However, the sensitivity for the detection of intracranial vascular stenoses > or =50% was only 8% (0 to 18%), with a specificity of 99% (98 to 100%). CONCLUSIONS: At this stage Contrast-enhanced MR angiography using a neurovascular coil shows promise as a rapid, specific, and noninvasive screening method for extracranial vascular disease, but not for intracranial vascular disease.
Authors: W Gregory Hundley; David A Bluemke; J Paul Finn; Scott D Flamm; Mark A Fogel; Matthias G Friedrich; Vincent B Ho; Michael Jerosch-Herold; Christopher M Kramer; Warren J Manning; Manesh Patel; Gerald M Pohost; Arthur E Stillman; Richard D White; Pamela K Woodard Journal: Circulation Date: 2010-05-17 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: W Gregory Hundley; David A Bluemke; J Paul Finn; Scott D Flamm; Mark A Fogel; Matthias G Friedrich; Vincent B Ho; Michael Jerosch-Herold; Christopher M Kramer; Warren J Manning; Manesh Patel; Gerald M Pohost; Arthur E Stillman; Richard D White; Pamela K Woodard Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2010-06-08 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Ioannis Koktzoglou; Emily A Aherne; Matthew T Walker; Joel R Meyer; Robert R Edelman Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2019-05-11 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Li Chen; Mahmud Mossa-Basha; Niranjan Balu; Gador Canton; Jie Sun; Kristi Pimentel; Thomas S Hatsukami; Jenq-Neng Hwang; Chun Yuan Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2017-10-17 Impact factor: 4.668