Literature DB >> 16009795

Aggressive versus moderate lipid-lowering therapy in hypercholesterolemic postmenopausal women: Beyond Endorsed Lipid Lowering with EBT Scanning (BELLES).

Paolo Raggi1, Michael Davidson, Tracy Q Callister, Francine K Welty, Gloria A Bachmann, Harvey Hecht, John A Rumberger.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Women have been underrepresented in statin trials, and few data exist on the effectiveness and safety of statins in this gender. We used sequential electron-beam tomography (EBT) scanning to quantify changes in coronary artery calcium (CAC) as a measure of atherosclerosis burden in patients treated with statins. METHODS AND
RESULTS: In a double-blind, multicenter trial, we randomized 615 hyperlipidemic, postmenopausal women to intensive (atorvastatin 80 mg/d) and moderate (pravastatin 40 mg/d) lipid-lowering therapy. Patients also submitted to 2 EBT scans at a 12-month interval (mean interval 344+/-55 days) to measure percent change in total and single-artery calcium volume score (CVS) from baseline. Of the 615 randomized women, 475 completed the study. Mean+/-SD percent LDL reductions were 46.6%+/-19.9% and 24.5%+/-18.5 in the intensive and moderate treatment arms, respectively (P<0.0001), and National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III LDL goal was reached in 85.3% and 58.8% of women, respectively (P<0.0001). The total CVS% change was similar in the 2 treatment groups (median 15.1% and 14.3%, respectively; P=NS), and single-artery CVS% changes and absolute changes were also similar (P=NS). In both arms, there was a trend toward a greater CVS progression in patients with prior cardiovascular disease, diabetes mellitus, and hypertension, whereas hormone replacement therapy had no effect on progression.
CONCLUSIONS: In postmenopausal women, intensive statin therapy for 1 year caused a greater LDL reduction than moderate therapy but did not result in less progression of coronary calcification. The limitations of this study (too short a follow-up period and the absence of a placebo group) precluded determination of whether progression of CVS was slowed in both arms or neither arm compared with the natural history of the disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16009795     DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.104.512681

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  55 in total

1.  Potential use of coronary artery calcium progression to guide the management of patients at risk for coronary artery disease events.

Authors:  John W McEvoy; Michael J Blaha; Khurram Nasir; Roger S Blumenthal; Steven R Jones
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2012-02

2.  Influence of statin treatment on coronary atherosclerosis visualised using multidetector computed tomography.

Authors:  Hans Hoffmann; Katja Frieler; Peter Schlattmann; Bernd Hamm; Marc Dewey
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-07-18       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  In Perspective: Estrogen Therapy Proves to Safely and Effectively Reduce Total Mortality and Coronary Heart Disease in Recently Postmenopausal Women.

Authors:  Howard N Hodis; Wendy J Mack
Journal:  Menopause Manag       Date:  2008-03

Review 4.  Progression of coronary artery calcification by cardiac computed tomography.

Authors:  Amir A Mahabadi; N Lehmann; I Dykun; T Müller; H Kälsch; R Erbel
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 1.443

Review 5.  Catalysis in abiotic structured media: an approach to selective synthesis of biopolymers.

Authors:  P-A Monnard
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 9.261

Review 6.  Primary prevention for patients with intermediate Framingham risk scores.

Authors:  Jason B Thompson; Juan J Rivera; Roger S Blumenthal; Peter Danyi
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 7.  Atherosclerosis regression: is low-density lipoprotein or high-density lipoprotein the answer?

Authors:  Stephen J Nicholls; E Murat Tuzcu; Steven E Nissen
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 5.113

8.  Coronary artery calcium screening: current status and recommendations from the European Society of Cardiac Radiology and North American Society for Cardiovascular Imaging.

Authors:  Matthijs Oudkerk; Arthur E Stillman; Sandra S Halliburton; Willi A Kalender; Stefan Möhlenkamp; Cynthia H McCollough; Rozemarijn Vliegenthart; Leslee J Shaw; William Stanford; Allen J Taylor; Peter M A van Ooijen; Lewis Wexler; Paolo Raggi
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-07-24       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 9.  Imaging of inflammation and calcification in aortic stenosis.

Authors:  Marc R Dweck; Nikhil V Joshi; James H F Rudd; David E Newby
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 10.  Coronary calcium: new insights, recent data, and clinical role.

Authors:  George Youssef; Nove Kalia; Sirous Darabian; Matthew J Budoff
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 2.931

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.