Literature DB >> 22095032

Potential use of coronary artery calcium progression to guide the management of patients at risk for coronary artery disease events.

John W McEvoy1, Michael J Blaha, Khurram Nasir, Roger S Blumenthal, Steven R Jones.   

Abstract

OPINION STATEMENT: Subclinical coronary artery disease (CAD) is widespread and under-diagnosed. Preventive efforts are required to reduce the burden of this disease and its complications. Imaging of coronary artery calcium (CAC) with cardiac computed tomography is highly specific for the diagnosis of subclinical CAD and can also facilitate treatment decisions in preventive cardiology. Indeed, CAC testing has been recommended by the American Heart Association for asymptomatic patients at intermediate risk for future cardiac events (as defined by clinical risk factors) to refine existing risk estimates. However, the optimal follow-up of those patients who have already undergone CAC testing remains unclear, particularly with regards to repeat CAC testing. The existing literature points to two major considerations for the use of CAC progression in the management of subclinical CAD. On one hand, CAC progression has been used as a surrogate marker to test the efficacy of cardiac preventive medications in halting or regressing CAD. To date, study results have been mostly disappointing and CAC progression appears resistant to medications such as statins. On the other hand, however, CAC progression has potential as a clinical indicator of underlying CAD activity. This may facilitate optimization or up-titration of preventive medications by using CAC progression as a marker of subclinical disease activity. We believe that the data, thus far, argues against the use of a CAC progression as a clinical surrogate marker of preventive therapy efficacy. Further studies with non-statin medications and with concomitant outcome data are needed. However, CAC progression has potential for monitoring subclinical CAD in some patients and may facilitate treatment decisions. In this review we will provide recommendations for repeat CAC testing and discuss when repeat CAC testing may be helpful to assess coronary artery disease progression.

Entities:  

Year:  2012        PMID: 22095032     DOI: 10.1007/s11936-011-0154-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med        ISSN: 1092-8464


  47 in total

1.  2010 ACCF/AHA guideline for assessment of cardiovascular risk in asymptomatic adults: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines.

Authors:  Philip Greenland; Joseph S Alpert; George A Beller; Emelia J Benjamin; Matthew J Budoff; Zahi A Fayad; Elyse Foster; Mark A Hlatky; John McB Hodgson; Frederick G Kushner; Michael S Lauer; Leslee J Shaw; Sidney C Smith; Allen J Taylor; William S Weintraub; Nanette K Wenger; Alice K Jacobs
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2010-11-15       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  The deadly double standard (the saga of screening for subclinical atherosclerosis).

Authors:  Harvey S Hecht
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2008-04-11       Impact factor: 2.778

3.  Quantification of coronary artery calcium using ultrafast computed tomography.

Authors:  A S Agatston; W R Janowitz; F J Hildner; N R Zusmer; M Viamonte; R Detrano
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1990-03-15       Impact factor: 24.094

4.  Determinants of coronary calcium conversion among patients with a normal coronary calcium scan: what is the "warranty period" for remaining normal?

Authors:  James K Min; Fay Y Lin; David S Gidseg; Jonathan W Weinsaft; Daniel S Berman; Leslee J Shaw; Alan Rozanski; Tracy Q Callister
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2010-03-16       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 5.  Coronary artery calcium progression: an important clinical measurement? A review of published reports.

Authors:  John W McEvoy; Michael J Blaha; Andrew P Defilippis; Matthew J Budoff; Khurram Nasir; Roger S Blumenthal; Steven R Jones
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2010-11-09       Impact factor: 24.094

6.  Coronary risk stratification, discrimination, and reclassification improvement based on quantification of subclinical coronary atherosclerosis: the Heinz Nixdorf Recall study.

Authors:  Raimund Erbel; Stefan Möhlenkamp; Susanne Moebus; Axel Schmermund; Nils Lehmann; Andreas Stang; Nico Dragano; Dietrich Grönemeyer; Rainer Seibel; Hagen Kälsch; Martina Bröcker-Preuss; Klaus Mann; Johannes Siegrist; Karl-Heinz Jöckel
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2010-10-19       Impact factor: 24.094

7.  Influence of a lipid-lowering therapy on calcified and noncalcified coronary plaques monitored by multislice detector computed tomography: results of the New Age II Pilot Study.

Authors:  Christof Burgstahler; Anja Reimann; Torsten Beck; Axel Kuettner; Dorothee Baumann; Martin Heuschmid; Harald Brodoefel; Claus D Claussen; Andreas F Kopp; Stephen Schroeder
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 6.016

8.  Selective use of coronary calcification measurements in an expanded intermediate risk group.

Authors:  Marietta S Ambrose; Christian D Nagy; Roger S Blumenthal
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr       Date:  2008-05-29

9.  A 1-year randomized trial of calcium acetate versus sevelamer on progression of coronary artery calcification in hemodialysis patients with comparable lipid control: the Calcium Acetate Renagel Evaluation-2 (CARE-2) study.

Authors:  Wajeh Qunibi; Moustafa Moustafa; Larry R Muenz; David Y He; Paul D Kessler; Jose A Diaz-Buxo; Mathew Budoff
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  2008-04-18       Impact factor: 8.860

10.  Association between multiple cardiovascular risk factors and atherosclerosis in children and young adults. The Bogalusa Heart Study.

Authors:  G S Berenson; S R Srinivasan; W Bao; W P Newman; R E Tracy; W A Wattigney
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1998-06-04       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  5 in total

1.  Genome association study of human chromosome 13 and susceptibility to coronary artery disease in a Chinese population.

Authors:  Peng Jie; Chen Xing; Li Tingting; Xie Yi; Zhang Jianning; Jiang Tingting; Liu Tianjiao; Chen Gang; Guo Yuan
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 1.166

2.  Mortality rates in smokers and nonsmokers in the presence or absence of coronary artery calcification.

Authors:  John W McEvoy; Michael J Blaha; Juan J Rivera; Matthew J Budoff; Atif N Khan; Leslee J Shaw; Daniel S Berman; Paolo Raggi; James K Min; John A Rumberger; Tracy Q Callister; Roger S Blumenthal; Khurram Nasir
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2012-10

3.  Progression of coronary calcium and incident coronary heart disease events: MESA (Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis).

Authors:  Matthew J Budoff; Rebekah Young; Victor A Lopez; Richard A Kronmal; Khurram Nasir; Roger S Blumenthal; Robert C Detrano; Diane E Bild; Alan D Guerci; Kiang Liu; Steven Shea; Moyses Szklo; Wendy Post; Joao Lima; Alain Bertoni; Nathan D Wong
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2013-03-26       Impact factor: 24.094

4.  Maintenance of Ideal Cardiovascular Health and Coronary Artery Calcium Progression in Low-Risk Men and Women in the Framingham Heart Study.

Authors:  Shih-Jen Hwang; Oyere Onuma; Joseph M Massaro; Xiaoling Zhang; Yi-Ping Fu; Udo Hoffmann; Caroline S Fox; Christopher J O'Donnell
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 7.792

5.  Automated coronary artery calcification scoring in non-gated chest CT: agreement and reliability.

Authors:  Richard A P Takx; Pim A de Jong; Tim Leiner; Matthijs Oudkerk; Harry J de Koning; Christian P Mol; Max A Viergever; Ivana Išgum
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-13       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.