Literature DB >> 16009245

The influence of gender and lesion location on naming disorders for animals, plants and artefacts.

Guido Gainotti1.   

Abstract

The aim of this systematic review of single case studies of patients showing a category-specific disorder was to evaluate the influence of gender and lesion location on category-specific disorders for biological versus artefact categories and, within the former, for animals versus plant life categories. Two complementary studies were made, taking into account all the available single case reports of category-specific disorders found in the literature. The first study consisted of an overall statistical evaluation of the influence that gender and lesion location can have upon naming scores obtained with these different categories in patients selected only because they showed some kind of category-specific disorder. The second study assessed the influence of these variables on more selected groups of patients, contrasting those showing a categorical impairment for living things versus artefacts and, respectively, for animals versus plant life categories. Results of these studies consistently showed that: (a) Lesion location has a strong influence on the distinction between biological and artefacts categories, but not on that between animals and plant life domains. In patients with a prevalent impairment either for animals or for plant life items, lesions usually encroach upon the anterior or the posterior parts of the ventral stream of visual processing, whereas in patients with a prevalent impairment for artefacts they are located elsewhere (usually on more dorsal structures of the brain). (b) Gender, on the contrary, does not influence the distinction between living and non-living things, but, within the living entities, has a strong influence on the distinction between animals and plant life. Consistent with data obtained in normal people, which show that men are more familiar with animals and women with fruit and vegetables, men were, indeed, more impaired with plant life categories, whereas women were more impaired with animals.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16009245     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2005.01.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychologia        ISSN: 0028-3932            Impact factor:   3.139


  16 in total

1.  Brain damage and semantic category dissociations: is the animals category easier for males?

Authors:  Stefania Scotti; Marcella Laiacona; Erminio Capitani
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2010-06-03       Impact factor: 3.307

2.  Measuring nonvisual knowledge about object categories: The Semantic Vanderbilt Expertise Test.

Authors:  Ana E Van Gulick; Rankin W McGugin; Isabel Gauthier
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2016-09

3.  The Vanderbilt Expertise Test reveals domain-general and domain-specific sex effects in object recognition.

Authors:  Rankin W McGugin; Jennifer J Richler; Grit Herzmann; Magen Speegle; Isabel Gauthier
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2012-08-02       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Why women see differently from the way men see? A review of sex differences in cognition and sports.

Authors:  Rena Li
Journal:  J Sport Health Sci       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 7.179

Review 5.  A lifespan perspective on semantic processing of concrete concepts: does a sensory/motor model have the potential to bridge the gap?

Authors:  Sharon M Antonucci; Mary Alt
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 3.282

6.  The left temporal pole is a convergence region mediating the relation between names and semantic knowledge for unique entities: Further evidence from a "recognition-from-name" study in neurological patients.

Authors:  Brett Schneider; Jonah Heskje; Joel Bruss; Daniel Tranel; Amy M Belfi
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2018-09-10       Impact factor: 4.027

7.  When concepts lose their color: a case of object-color knowledge impairment.

Authors:  Alena Stasenko; Frank E Garcea; Mary Dombovy; Bradford Z Mahon
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2014-06-21       Impact factor: 4.027

8.  Neuroanatomical and cognitive mediators of age-related differences in perceptual priming and learning.

Authors:  Kristen M Kennedy; Karen M Rodrigue; Denise Head; Faith Gunning-Dixon; Naftali Raz
Journal:  Neuropsychology       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 3.295

9.  A new standardization of semantic verbal fluency test.

Authors:  Barbara Zarino; Marta Crespi; Michela Launi; Alessandra Casarotti
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2014-04-06       Impact factor: 3.307

10.  Anomia for musical entities.

Authors:  Amy M Belfi; Anna Kasdan; Daniel Tranel
Journal:  Aphasiology       Date:  2017-12-01       Impact factor: 2.773

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.