Literature DB >> 16009162

Perinatal outcome of blastocyst transfer with vitrification using cryoloop: a 4-year follow-up study.

Katsuhiko Takahashi1, Tetsunori Mukaida, Tetsuya Goto, Chikahiro Oka.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate perinatal outcome of ultrarapid vitrified blastocyst transfer.
DESIGN: Retrospective study.
SETTING: Private IVF clinics. PATIENT(S): One hundred eight women, who delivered 147 babies. INTERVENTION(S): Supernumerary blastocysts were vitrified using cryoloop method and transferred after warming. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Survival rate of blastocyst after vitrification, implantation and pregnancy rates, neonatal outcome and congenital birth defects. RESULT(S): A total of 1,129 vitrified blastocysts from 435 cycles were warmed and 967 survived (85.7%). In 413 cycles of transfer, the pregnancy, implantation, and abortion rates were 44.1%, 29.0%, and 22.0%, respectively. Of 108 deliveries, 34 (32.9%) were multiple pregnancies and 20 were preterm (18.5%). Out of 147 children born, 50.3% were male and congenital birth defects were observed in 1.4%. These results were similar with those of fresh blastocyst transfer program. CONCLUSION(S): The vitrification of blastocyst using cryoloop is a simple, easy, and quick method. This technique yields the same high pregnancy and implantation rates as fresh blastocyst transfer. Congenital defect rate in this study was similar to fresh blastocyst transfer, proving the method to be safe.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16009162     DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2004.12.051

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  29 in total

1.  Outcomes of day 3 embryo transfer with vitrification using Cryoleaf: a 3-year follow-up study.

Authors:  Xing-ling Wang; Xiao Zhang; Yao-qin Qin; Da-yong Hao; Hui-rong Shi
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2012-06-10       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Can fresh embryo transfers be replaced by cryopreserved-thawed embryo transfers in assisted reproductive cycles? A randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Abbas Aflatoonian; Homa Oskouian; Shahnaz Ahmadi; Leila Oskouian
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2010-04-06       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 3.  Cryopreservation in ART and concerns with contamination during cryobanking.

Authors:  Mark G Larman; Shu Hashimoto; Yoshiharu Morimoto; David K Gardner
Journal:  Reprod Med Biol       Date:  2014-02-05

4.  Elective cryopreservation of all day 5 blastocysts is more effective than using day 6 blastocysts for improving pregnancy outcome in stimulated cycles.

Authors:  Setsuko Yamamoto; Michiko Umeki; Teruhiro Hamano; Fujiyo Matsusita; Kimiko Kuwahara
Journal:  Reprod Med Biol       Date:  2008-04-17

5.  Assisted hatching and live births in first-cycle frozen embryo transfers.

Authors:  Jennifer F Knudtson; Courtney M Failor; Jonathan A Gelfond; Martin W Goros; Tiencheng Arthur Chang; Robert S Schenken; Randal D Robinson
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2017-08-30       Impact factor: 7.329

6.  Comparison of vitrified outcomes between human early blastocysts and expanded blastocysts.

Authors:  Wen-Yan Song; Xue-Gai Wang; Hai-Xia Jin; Gui-Dong Yao; Xiang-Yang Zhang; Sen-Lin Shi; Hong-Yi Yang; Zhao-Feng Peng; Ying-Pu Sun
Journal:  In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim       Date:  2016-03-08       Impact factor: 2.416

7.  Vitrification of human embryos subjected to blastomere biopsy for pre-implantation genetic screening produces higher survival and pregnancy rates than slow freezing.

Authors:  Levent Keskintepe; Geoffrey Sher; Anna Machnicka; Drew Tortoriello; Aykut Bayrak; Jeffrey Fisch; Yuksel Agca
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2009-12-05       Impact factor: 3.412

8.  Vitrification versus slow freezing gives excellent survival, post warming embryo morphology and pregnancy outcomes for human cleaved embryos.

Authors:  Mojtaba Rezazadeh Valojerdi; Poopak Eftekhari-Yazdi; Leila Karimian; Fatemeh Hassani; Bahar Movaghar
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2009-06-10       Impact factor: 3.412

9.  Comparison of clinical outcomes between single and double vitrified-warmed blastocyst embryo transfer according to the day of vitrification.

Authors:  Sang Min Kang; Sang Won Lee; San Hyun Yoon; Joo Cheol Kim; Jin Ho Lim; Seong Goo Lee
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2013-05-30       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 10.  Factors affecting the outcome of human blastocyst vitrification.

Authors:  Amr A Kader; Audrey Choi; Yasser Orief; Ashok Agarwal
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2009-09-16       Impact factor: 5.211

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.