BACKGROUND: Bone marrow contains hematopoietic stem cells, nonhematopoietic mesenchymal stem cells, and several precursor cells for osteoblasts, chondrocytes, adipocytes, myocytes, hepatocytes, and even neural cells. Research findings indicate that multipotent stem cells in the adult body may be used to recover the lost functions of damaged tissues. This study examined the involvement of bone marrow-derived cells in the regeneration of the stomach after experimental gastric ulcers were produced in rats. METHODS: We transplanted the bone marrow of transgenic rats that expressed green fluorescence protein (GFP) throughout the body. Twenty-one days after the bone marrow transplantation (BMT), gastric ulceration was induced, using absolute ethanol. Control animals received saline. After various observation periods, rats harboring GFP-positive bone marrow-derived cells were killed, and the tissues were removed and processed to prepare paraffin-embedded sections. Cells expressing GFP were identified by conventional immunohistochemistry, using anti-GFP antibody. To identify whether cells expressing GFP were epithelial cells or interstitial cells such as fibroblasts, serial sections were examined with anti-cytokeratin antibody or anti-vimentin antibody, respectively. Furthermore, to confirm that cells expressing GFP were epithelial cells or interstitial cells, we used double-staining analysis with anti-GFP antibody or anti-cytokeratin antibody, respectively. RESULTS: GFP-positive, bone marrow-derived cells were found in the cytokeratin-positive gastrointestinal epithelium, as well as among vimentin-positive interstitial cells. Interestingly, the proportions of GFP-positive, cytokeratin-positive epithelial cells and vimentin-positive interstitial cells were significantly greater in the ethanol-treated damaged stomachs than in the saline-treated controls. CONCLUSIONS: The present study clearly demonstrates that bone marrow-derived cells are involved in the regeneration of the stomach after ethanol-induced ulcers in rats.
BACKGROUND: Bone marrow contains hematopoietic stem cells, nonhematopoietic mesenchymal stem cells, and several precursor cells for osteoblasts, chondrocytes, adipocytes, myocytes, hepatocytes, and even neural cells. Research findings indicate that multipotent stem cells in the adult body may be used to recover the lost functions of damaged tissues. This study examined the involvement of bone marrow-derived cells in the regeneration of the stomach after experimental gastric ulcers were produced in rats. METHODS: We transplanted the bone marrow of transgenic rats that expressed green fluorescence protein (GFP) throughout the body. Twenty-one days after the bone marrow transplantation (BMT), gastric ulceration was induced, using absolute ethanol. Control animals received saline. After various observation periods, rats harboring GFP-positive bone marrow-derived cells were killed, and the tissues were removed and processed to prepare paraffin-embedded sections. Cells expressing GFP were identified by conventional immunohistochemistry, using anti-GFP antibody. To identify whether cells expressing GFP were epithelial cells or interstitial cells such as fibroblasts, serial sections were examined with anti-cytokeratin antibody or anti-vimentin antibody, respectively. Furthermore, to confirm that cells expressing GFP were epithelial cells or interstitial cells, we used double-staining analysis with anti-GFP antibody or anti-cytokeratin antibody, respectively. RESULTS: GFP-positive, bone marrow-derived cells were found in the cytokeratin-positive gastrointestinal epithelium, as well as among vimentin-positive interstitial cells. Interestingly, the proportions of GFP-positive, cytokeratin-positive epithelial cells and vimentin-positive interstitial cells were significantly greater in the ethanol-treated damaged stomachs than in the saline-treated controls. CONCLUSIONS: The present study clearly demonstrates that bone marrow-derived cells are involved in the regeneration of the stomach after ethanol-induced ulcers in rats.
Authors: E D Thomas; R Storb; R A Clift; A Fefer; L Johnson; P E Neiman; K G Lerner; H Glucksberg; C D Buckner Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1975-04-24 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: E Thomas; R Storb; R A Clift; A Fefer; F L Johnson; P E Neiman; K G Lerner; H Glucksberg; C D Buckner Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1975-04-17 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: E M Horwitz; D J Prockop; L A Fitzpatrick; W W Koo; P L Gordon; M Neel; M Sussman; P Orchard; J C Marx; R E Pyeritz; M K Brenner Journal: Nat Med Date: 1999-03 Impact factor: 53.440
Authors: G Ferrari; G Cusella-De Angelis; M Coletta; E Paolucci; A Stornaiuolo; G Cossu; F Mavilio Journal: Science Date: 1998-03-06 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: R F Pereira; K W Halford; M D O'Hara; D B Leeper; B P Sokolov; M D Pollard; O Bagasra; D J Prockop Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 1995-05-23 Impact factor: 11.205