Literature DB >> 16005312

Rapid aneuploidy testing, traditional karyotyping, or both?

W C Leung1, T T Lao.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  2005        PMID： 16005312     DOI： 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)66791-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet        ISSN： 0140-6736            Impact factor:   79.321


× No keyword cloud information.
  9 in total

1.  BACs-on-Beads™ assay, a rapid aneuploidy test, improves the diagnostic yield of conventional karyotyping.

Authors:  Chantal Farra; Anwar H Nassar; Fadi Mirza; Lina Abdouni; Mirna Souaid; Johnny Awwad
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2019-10-08       Impact factor: 2.316

2.  Rapid aneuploidy detection with multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification: a prospective study of 4000 amniotic fluid samples.

Authors:  Diane Van Opstal; Marjan Boter; Danielle de Jong; Cardi van den Berg; Hennie T Brüggenwirth; Hajo I J Wildschut; Annelies de Klein; Robert-Jan H Galjaard
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2008-09-10       Impact factor: 4.246

3.  The importance of rapid aneuploidy screening and prenatal diagnosis in the detection of numerical chromosomal abnormalities.

Authors:  Ghada M Elsayed; Lobna El Assiouty; Ezzat S El Sobky
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2013-09-29

4.  Prenatal screening methods for aneuploidies.

Authors:  Madhusudan Dey; Sumedha Sharma; Sumita Aggarwal
Journal:  N Am J Med Sci       Date:  2013-03

5.  Is routine karyotyping required in prenatal samples with a molecular or metabolic referral?

Authors:  Angelique Ja Kooper; Jacqueline Jpm Pieters; Brigitte Hw Faas; Lies H Hoefsloot; Ineke van der Burgt; Hans A Zondervan; Arie Pt Smits
Journal:  Mol Cytogenet       Date:  2012-01-27       Impact factor: 2.009

6.  BACs-on-Beads technology: a reliable test for rapid detection of aneuploidies and microdeletions in prenatal diagnosis.

Authors:  Sandra García-Herrero; Inmaculada Campos-Galindo; José Antonio Martínez-Conejero; Vicente Serra; Inés Olmo; Coral Lara; Carlos Simón; Carmen Rubio
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-03-27       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 7.  Prenatal screening for genetic disorders: Suggested guidelines for the Indian Scenario.

Authors:  Shubha R Phadke; Ratna D Puri; Prajnya Ranganath
Journal:  Indian J Med Res       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 2.375

Review 8.  Implementation of high resolution whole genome array CGH in the prenatal clinical setting: advantages, challenges, and review of the literature.

Authors:  Paola Evangelidou; Angelos Alexandrou; Maria Moutafi; Marios Ioannides; Pavlos Antoniou; George Koumbaris; Ioannis Kallikas; Voula Velissariou; Carolina Sismani; Philippos C Patsalis
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2013-03-04       Impact factor: 3.411

9.  Multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification versus karyotyping in prenatal diagnosis: the M.A.K.E. study.

Authors:  Elisabeth M A Boormans; Erwin Birnie; Hajo I Wildschut; Heleen G Schuring-Blom; Dick Oepkes; Carla A C van Oppen; Jan G Nijhuis; Merryn V E Macville; Angelique J A Kooper; Karin Huijsdens; Mariëtte V J Hoffer; Attie Go; Johan Creemers; Shama L Bhola; Katia M Bilardo; Ron Suijkerbuijk; Katelijne Bouman; Robert-Jan H Galjaard; Gouke J Bonsel; Jan Mm van Lith
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2008-05-20       Impact factor: 3.007
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.