Literature DB >> 16004892

Stress echo in chest pain unit: the SPEED trial.

Gigliola Bedetti1, Emilio M Pasanisi, Giancarlo Tintori, Lucas Fonseca, Simone Tresoldi, Calogero Minneci, Zoltan Jambrik, Bruno Ghelarducci, Andres Orlandini, Eugenio Picano.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Emergency room (ER) evaluation of patients with acute chest pain and non-diagnostic electrocardiography (ECG) remains a frequent and difficult problem. AIM: To assess safety and prognostic implications of pharmacological stress echocardiography in the ER chest pain unit (CPU).
METHODS: A total of 552 patients (321 males, age 58+/-12.6 years) with acute chest pain, negative serial enzymes and/or troponin, and ECG recordings, and normal/unchanged resting left ventricular function were prospectively enrolled and underwent pharmacological (dipyridamole or dobutamine) stress echo. Six echo labs that had passed the preliminary quality control for stress echo reading entered the study. Follow-up was obtained in all patients after a median period of 13 months.
RESULTS: No significant adverse events were observed during the test. Stress echocardiography was negative in 502 patients (91%) and positive in 50 (9%). The 502 patients with negative stress echocardiography were discharged with no or unchanged anti-ischemic medications. While the 50 patients with positive stress echo were admitted to the coronary care unit, 44 of these underwent coronary angiography with the result that 42 out of 44 showed significant coronary artery disease. There were 45 events in the follow-up: six in the 502 patients with negative and 39 in the 50 patients with positive stress echo (1.2% vs. 78%, p<0.001). The negative predictive value of stress echocardiography was 98.8% for all events and 99.6% for hard events.
CONCLUSIONS: Stress echocardiography is a feasible, safe, and effective tool for early stratification of patients admitted to the ER with acute chest pain and non-ischemic ECG and resting echo.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16004892     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2004.05.058

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cardiol        ISSN: 0167-5273            Impact factor:   4.164


  10 in total

1.  Prognostic value of real time dobutamine stress myocardial contrast echocardiography in patients with chest pain syndrome.

Authors:  Geu-Ru Hong; Jong-Seon Park; Sang-Hee Lee; Dong-Gu Shin; Ung Kim; Jung Hyun Choi; Robin Abdelmalik; Jesús A Vera; Jin-Kyung Kim; Jagat Narula; Mani A Vannan
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2011-12-06       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 2.  Chest pain: coronary CT in the ER.

Authors:  Erica Maffei; Sara Seitun; Andrea I Guaricci; Filippo Cademartiri
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-02-11       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 3.  Finding the Gatekeeper to the Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory: Coronary CT Angiography or Stress Testing?

Authors:  Thomas H Marwick; Iksung Cho; Bríain Ó Hartaigh; James K Min
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2015-06-30       Impact factor: 24.094

4.  Myocardial deformation by strain echocardiography identifies patients with acute coronary syndrome and non-diagnostic ECG presenting in a chest pain unit: a prospective study of diagnostic accuracy.

Authors:  Joerg Schroeder; Sandra Hamada; Nina Gründlinger; Tanja Rubeau; Ertunc Altiok; Katrin Ulbrich; Andras Keszei; Nikolaus Marx; Michael Becker
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2015-09-08       Impact factor: 5.460

Review 5.  Coronary CT and the coronary calcium score, the future of ED risk stratification?

Authors:  Leticia Fernandez-Friera; Ana Garcia-Alvarez; Gabriela Guzman; Mario J Garcia
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rev       Date:  2012-05

6.  Coronary disease in emergency department chest pain patients with recent negative stress testing.

Authors:  Jonathan Walker; Michael Galuska; David Vega
Journal:  West J Emerg Med       Date:  2010-09

7.  Prognostic value of normal stress echocardiography in obese patients.

Authors:  Michele Murphy; Siva Krothapalli; Jose Cuellar; Somsupha Kanjanauthai; Brian Heeke; Pallavi S Gomadam; Avirup Guha; Vernon A Barnes; Sheldon E Litwin; Gyanendra K Sharma
Journal:  J Obes       Date:  2014-08-31

8.  Prognostic value of adenosine stress cardiovascular magnetic resonance in patients with low-risk chest pain.

Authors:  Stamatios Lerakis; Dalton S McLean; Athanasios V Anadiotis; Matthew Janik; John N Oshinski; Nikolaos Alexopoulos; Elisa Zaragoza-Macias; Emir Veledar; Arthur E Stillman
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2009-09-21       Impact factor: 5.364

9.  Economic analysis including long-term risks and costs of alternative diagnostic strategies to evaluate patients with chest pain.

Authors:  Gigliola Bedetti; Emilio Maria Pasanisi; Carmine Pizzi; Giuseppe Turchetti; Cosimo Loré
Journal:  Cardiovasc Ultrasound       Date:  2008-05-29       Impact factor: 2.062

10.  Real-world performance and accuracy of stress echocardiography: the EVAREST observational multi-centre study.

Authors:  William Woodward; Cameron Dockerill; Annabelle McCourt; Ross Upton; Jamie O'Driscoll; Katrin Balkhausen; Badrinathan Chandrasekaran; Soroosh Firoozan; Attila Kardos; Kenneth Wong; Gary Woodward; Rizwan Sarwar; Nikant Sabharwal; Elena Benedetto; Nancy Spagou; Rajan Sharma; Daniel Augustine; Apostolos Tsiachristas; Roxy Senior; Paul Leeson; Henry Boardman; Joanna d'Arcy; Abraheem Abraheem; Sanjay Banypersad; Christopher Boos; Sudantha Bulugahapitiya; Jeremy Butts; Duncan Coles; Jacob Easaw; Haytham Hamdan; Shahnaz Jamil-Copley; Gajen Kanaganayagam; Tom Mwambingu; Antonis Pantazis; Alexandros Papachristidis; Ronak Rajani; Muhammad Amer Rasheed; Naveed A Razvi; Sushma Rekhraj; David P Ripley; Kathleen Rose; Michaela Scheuermann-Freestone; Rebecca Schofield; Ayyaz Sultan
Journal:  Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2022-04-18       Impact factor: 6.875

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.