Literature DB >> 16004677

Patients' perceptions regarding oral anticoagulation therapy and its effect on quality of life.

P Casais1, S S Meschengieser, A Sanchez-Luceros, M A Lazzari.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Anticoagulation clinics have improved the time spent within therapeutic range and decreased hemorrhagic complications and costs in chronic oral anticoagulation. Whether these benefits correlate to patients' quality of life (QOL) remains to be determined. The impact of patients' perceptions about anticoagulation on QOL has not been evaluated. The objective of this study was to evaluate prospectively patients' perceptions and quality of life in patients chronically anticoagulated. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A cross-sectional study was designed to investigate the prevalence of positive and negative perceptions about oral anticoagulation therapy (OAT) and to identify vulnerable groups. Patients anonymously completed the SF-36 survey and a questionnaire that focused on patients' perceptions of protection from thrombotic complications or fear of haemorrhage due to the anticoagulation. We related those perceptions to the General Health SF-36 score, to the patient's characteristics, the absolute bleeding risk (i.e. intended International Normalized Ratio [INR]), duration of therapy and medical attention.
RESULTS: One thousand patients were included and 905 questionnaires evaluated. Most patients felt protected and better since the beginning of therapy (71.5% and 61.5%, respectively). Patient characteristics associated with negative perceptions were; female sex (Odds Ratio [OR] 1.58, 95% Confidence Interval [CI] 1.06-2.36, p = 0.01); patients with less than 1 year of therapy (OR 2.16, 95% CI 1.34-3.48, p = 0.006); those not satisfied with medical attention (OR 2.86, 95% CI 1.53-5.18, p = 0.0001); and those that modified their lifestyle (OR 2.75, 95% CI 1.49-4.91, p = 0.0002). Patients with a lower bleeding risk (INR 2.0-3.0) had more negative perceptions than those with a higher risk. Patients with negative perceptions achieved the lowest score in the SF-36 survey. Haemorrhages did not affect patients' perception or QOL.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients' perceptions correlated with QOL. We were able to identify patient characteristics associated with poor QOL and thus the group of patients whose negative perceptions most warranted special attention from their clinicians.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16004677     DOI: 10.1185/030079905X50624

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Med Res Opin        ISSN: 0300-7995            Impact factor:   2.580


  21 in total

1.  Physicians' perceptions of the definition of major bleeding in major orthopedic surgery: results of an international survey.

Authors:  Enrique Ginzburg; Franck Dujardin
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 2.300

Review 2.  Factors Affecting Patients' Perception On, and Adherence To, Anticoagulant Therapy: Anticipating the Role of Direct Oral Anticoagulants.

Authors:  Ekta Y Pandya; Beata Bajorek
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 3.883

Review 3.  Patient values and preferences in decision making for antithrombotic therapy: a systematic review: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines.

Authors:  Samantha MacLean; Sohail Mulla; Elie A Akl; Milosz Jankowski; Per Olav Vandvik; Shanil Ebrahim; Shelley McLeod; Neera Bhatnagar; Gordon H Guyatt
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 9.410

4.  Patient satisfaction with extended-interval warfarin monitoring.

Authors:  Nicholas W Carris; Andrew Y Hwang; Steven M Smith; James R Taylor; Karen Sando; Jason Powell; Eric I Rosenberg; Marc S Zumberg; John G Gums; Eric A Dietrich; Katherine Vogel Anderson
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 2.300

5.  Patients' satisfaction associated with portable coagulometers for warfarin monitoring: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Nicoletta Riva; Christian Borg Xuereb; Walter Ageno; Michael Makris; Alex Gatt
Journal:  Blood Transfus       Date:  2020-06-04       Impact factor: 3.443

6.  Quality of life analysis of patients in chronic use of oral anticoagulant: an observational study.

Authors:  Geisa de Queiroz Almeida; Lúcia de A C B Noblat; Luiz Carlos Santana Passos; Harrison Floriano do Nascimento
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2011-10-25       Impact factor: 3.186

7.  Multinational development of a questionnaire assessing patient satisfaction with anticoagulant treatment: the 'Perception of Anticoagulant Treatment Questionnaire' (PACT-Q).

Authors:  Martin H Prins; Alexia Marrel; Paulo Carita; David Anderson; Marie-Germaine Bousser; Harry Crijns; Silla Consoli; Benoit Arnould
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2009-02-06       Impact factor: 3.186

8.  Quality of Life of Patients Under Anticoagulant Therapy Compared to Patients Treated with Antiplatelet Therapy.

Authors:  Eda Çoban; Dilek Ataklı; Aysun Soysal; Dursun Kırbaş
Journal:  Noro Psikiyatr Ars       Date:  2018-05-04       Impact factor: 1.339

Review 9.  Gastrointestinal Bleeding and Direct Oral Anticoagulants among Patients with Atrial Fibrillation: Risk, Prevention, Management, and Quality of Life.

Authors:  Paolo Zappulla; Valeria Calvi
Journal:  TH Open       Date:  2021-06-16

10.  Safety relevant knowledge of orally anticoagulated patients without self-monitoring: a baseline survey in primary care.

Authors:  Jean-François Chenot; Thanh Duc Hua; Manar Abu Abed; Hannelore Schneider-Rudt; Tim Friede; Simon Schneider; Stefan Viktor Vormfelde
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2014-05-25       Impact factor: 2.497

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.