Literature DB >> 16003735

Screening for cervical cancer in India: How much will it cost? A trial based analysis of the cost per case detected.

Rosa Legood1, Alastair M Gray, Cedric Mahé, Jane Wolstenholme, Kasturi Jayant, Bhagwan M Nene, Surendra S Shastri, Sylla G Malvi, Richard Muwonge, Atul M Budukh, Rengaswamy Sankaranarayanan.   

Abstract

The cost and cost effectiveness of screening previously unscreened women by VIA, cytology or HPV testing was investigated within a large cluster randomised trial involving 131,178 women in rural India. All resources involved in implementation, training, management, recruitment, screening and diagnosis were identified and costed. We estimated the total costs and detection rates for each cluster and used these data to calculate an average cluster cost and detection rate for each screening approach. These estimates were combined to estimate a cost per case of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2/3 or invasive cancer (CIN 2/3+) detected. The average total costs per 1,000 women eligible for screening were US dollar 3,917, US dollar 6,609 and US dollar 11,779 with VIA, cytology and HPV respectively. The cost of detecting a case of CIN2/3+ using VIA was dollar 522 (95% CI dollar 429- dollar 652). Our results suggest that more CIN2/3+ cases would be detected in the same population if cytology were used instead of VIA and each additional case would cost US dollar 1065 (95% CI dollar 713- dollar2175). Delivering cervical cancer screening is potentially expensive in a low-income country although costs might be lower outside a trial setting. We found screening with VIA to be the least expensive option, but it also detected fewer cases of CIN2/3+ than other methods; its long-term cost-effectiveness will depend on the long-term benefits of early detection. Cytology was more effective at detecting cases than VIA but was also more expensive. Our findings indicate that HPV may not be a cost effective screening strategy in India at current consumable prices. Copyright 2005 Wiley-Liss, Inc

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16003735     DOI: 10.1002/ijc.21220

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cancer        ISSN: 0020-7136            Impact factor:   7.396


  25 in total

1.  Knowledge, Awareness and Prevention of Cervical Cancer among Women Attending a Tertiary Care Hospital in Puducherry, India.

Authors:  Jansirani Siddharthar; Bhuvaneshwari Rajkumar; Kuberan Deivasigamani
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2014-06-20

2.  Cancer care inequity for women in resource-poor countries.

Authors:  Joyce Varughese; Susan Richman
Journal:  Rev Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2010

3.  Accuracy of optical spectroscopy for the detection of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia without colposcopic tissue information; a step toward automation for low resource settings.

Authors:  Jose-Miguel Yamal; Getie A Zewdie; Dennis D Cox; E Neely Atkinson; Scott B Cantor; Calum MacAulay; Kalatu Davies; Isaac Adewole; Timon P H Buys; Michele Follen
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 3.170

Review 4.  Advancing cervical cancer prevention in India: implementation science priorities.

Authors:  Suneeta Krishnan; Emily Madsen; Deborah Porterfield; Beena Varghese
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2013-11-11

5.  Impact of patient adherence and test performance on the cost-effectiveness of cervical cancer screening in developing countries: the case of Honduras.

Authors:  Rebecca B Perkins; Sarah M Langrish; Linda J Stern; James F Burgess; Carol J Simon
Journal:  Womens Health Issues       Date:  2009-11-26

6.  Comparing upper gastrointestinal X-ray and endoscopy for gastric cancer diagnosis in Korea.

Authors:  Hoo-Yeon Lee; Eun-Cheol Park; Jae-Kwan Jun; Kui-Son Choi; Myung-Il Hahm
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-01-14       Impact factor: 5.742

7.  Human papillomavirus genotyping by multiplex pyrosequencing in cervical cancer patients from India.

Authors:  Cheryl M Travasso; Mona Anand; Mansi Samarth; Aditi Deshpande; Chandan Kumar-Sinha
Journal:  J Biosci       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 1.826

8.  Costs of cervical cancer screening and treatment using visual inspection with acetic acid (VIA) and cryotherapy in Ghana: the importance of scale.

Authors:  Wilm Quentin; Yaw Adu-Sarkodie; Fern Terris-Prestholt; Rosa Legood; Baafuor K Opoku; Philippe Mayaud
Journal:  Trop Med Int Health       Date:  2011-01-09       Impact factor: 2.622

9.  Cervical cancer screening: Current knowledge & practice among women in a rural population of Kerala, India.

Authors:  S Aswathy; Mariya Amin Quereshi; Beteena Kurian; K Leelamoni
Journal:  Indian J Med Res       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 2.375

10.  Empirical evidence of the continuing improvement in cost efficiency of an endoscopic surveillance programme for gastric cancer in Singapore from 2004 to 2010.

Authors:  Hui Jun Zhou; Shu Chuen Li; Nasheen Naidoo; Feng Zhu; Khay Guan Yeoh
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2013-04-15       Impact factor: 2.655

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.