Literature DB >> 22559693

Accuracy of optical spectroscopy for the detection of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia without colposcopic tissue information; a step toward automation for low resource settings.

Jose-Miguel Yamal1, Getie A Zewdie, Dennis D Cox, E Neely Atkinson, Scott B Cantor, Calum MacAulay, Kalatu Davies, Isaac Adewole, Timon P H Buys, Michele Follen.   

Abstract

Optical spectroscopy has been proposed as an accurate and low-cost alternative for detection of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. We previously published an algorithm using optical spectroscopy as an adjunct to colposcopy and found good accuracy (sensitivity=1.00 [95% confidence interval (CI)=0.92 to 1.00], specificity=0.71 [95% CI=0.62 to 0.79]). Those results used measurements taken by expert colposcopists as well as the colposcopy diagnosis. In this study, we trained and tested an algorithm for the detection of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (i.e., identifying those patients who had histology reading CIN 2 or worse) that did not include the colposcopic diagnosis. Furthermore, we explored the interaction between spectroscopy and colposcopy, examining the importance of probe placement expertise. The colposcopic diagnosis-independent spectroscopy algorithm had a sensitivity of 0.98 (95% CI=0.89 to 1.00) and a specificity of 0.62 (95% CI=0.52 to 0.71). The difference in the partial area under the ROC curves between spectroscopy with and without the colposcopic diagnosis was statistically significant at the patient level (p=0.05) but not the site level (p=0.13). The results suggest that the device has high accuracy over a wide range of provider accuracy and hence could plausibly be implemented by providers with limited training.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22559693      PMCID: PMC3380950          DOI: 10.1117/1.JBO.17.4.047002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomed Opt        ISSN: 1083-3668            Impact factor:   3.170


  71 in total

1.  Autofluorescence patterns in short-term cultures of normal cervical tissue.

Authors:  C K Brookner; M Follen; I Boiko; J Galvan; S Thomsen; A Malpica; S Suzuki; R Lotan; R Richards-Kortum
Journal:  Photochem Photobiol       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 3.421

2.  Autofluorescence microscopy of fresh cervical-tissue sections reveals alterations in tissue biochemistry with dysplasia.

Authors:  R Drezek; C Brookner; I Pavlova; I Boiko; A Malpica; R Lotan; M Follen; R Richards-Kortum
Journal:  Photochem Photobiol       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 3.421

3.  Multispectral digital colposcopy for in vivo detection of cervical cancer.

Authors:  Juan Benavides; Sung Chang; Sun Park; Rebecca Richards-Kortum; Nick Mackinnon; Calum Macaulay; Andrea Milbourne; Anais Malpica; Michele Follen
Journal:  Opt Express       Date:  2003-05-19       Impact factor: 3.894

Review 4.  Effective screening programmes for cervical cancer in low- and middle-income developing countries.

Authors:  R Sankaranarayanan; A M Budukh; R Rajkumar
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  2001-11-01       Impact factor: 9.408

5.  Fluorescence spectroscopy for cervical precancer detection: Is there variance across the menstrual cycle?

Authors:  Sung K Chang; M Yusoff Dawood; Gregg Staerkel; Urs Utzinger; E Neely Atkinson; Rebecca R Richards-Kortum; Michele Follen
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 3.170

Review 6.  See-and-treat strategy for diagnosis and management of cervical squamous intraepithelial lesions.

Authors:  Marylou Cárdenas-Turanzas; Michele Follen; John-Louis Benedet; Scott B Cantor
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 41.316

7.  Innovations in the treatment of invasive cervical cancer.

Authors:  Frederick B Stehman; Peter G Rose; Benjamin E Greer; Michel Roy; Marie Plante; Manuel Penalver; Anuja Jhingran; Patricia Eifel; Fredrick Montz; J Taylor Wharton
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2003-11-01       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  The quality of community colposcopic practice.

Authors:  John L Benedet; Jasenka P Matisic; Monique A Bertrand
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 7.661

9.  HPV screening for cervical cancer in rural India.

Authors:  Rengaswamy Sankaranarayanan; Bhagwan M Nene; Surendra S Shastri; Kasturi Jayant; Richard Muwonge; Atul M Budukh; Sanjay Hingmire; Sylla G Malvi; Ranjit Thorat; Ashok Kothari; Roshan Chinoy; Rohini Kelkar; Shubhada Kane; Sangeetha Desai; Vijay R Keskar; Raghevendra Rajeshwarkar; Nandkumar Panse; Ketayun A Dinshaw
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2009-04-02       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Patient distress and satisfaction with optical spectroscopy in cervical dysplasia detection.

Authors:  Karen Basen-Engquist; Eileen H Shinn; Carla Warneke; Carl de Moor; Tao Le; Rebecca Richards-Kortum; Michele Follen
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 8.661

View more
  3 in total

1.  A statistical model for removing inter-device differences in spectroscopy.

Authors:  Lu Wang; Jong Soo Lee; Pierre Lane; E Neely Atkinson; Andres Zuluaga; Michele Follen; Calum MacAulay; Dennis D Cox
Journal:  Opt Express       Date:  2014-04-07       Impact factor: 3.894

2.  Prediction using hierarchical data: Applications for automated detection of cervical cancer.

Authors:  Jose-Miguel Yamal; Martial Guillaud; E Neely Atkinson; Michele Follen; Calum MacAulay; Scott B Cantor; Dennis D Cox
Journal:  Stat Anal Data Min       Date:  2015-04-08       Impact factor: 1.051

3.  Multivariate functional response regression, with application to fluorescence spectroscopy in a cervical pre-cancer study.

Authors:  Hongxiao Zhu; Jeffrey S Morris; Fengrong Wei; Dennis D Cox
Journal:  Comput Stat Data Anal       Date:  2017-02-15       Impact factor: 1.681

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.