INTRODUCTION: Therapeutic drug monitoring of mycophenolate mofetil is recommended because of the interindividual variability in the exposition to its active moiety, mycophenolic acid. However, most of the pharmacokinetic studies involved patients cotreated with cyclosporine (INN, ciclosporin). METHODS: We analyzed the pharmacokinetics of mycophenolic acid in 13 renal graft recipients treated with sirolimus in an anticalcineurin-free regimen and compared it with that of 17 patients cotreated withcyclosporine. The area under the concentration versus time curve over a 12-hour period (AUC 0-12 ) of mycophenolic acid was estimated at 2 weeks, 1 month, 2 months, and 3 months after transplantation. RESULTS: At the first 3 time points, patients cotreated with sirolimus had significantly higher mycophenolic acid AUC 0-12 values compared with patients cotreated with cyclosporine, as follows: 81 mg . h/L (SD, 39 mg . h/L) versus 43 mg . h/L (SD, 11 mg . h/L) (P < .001), 72 mg . h/L (SD, 17 mg . h/L) versus 48 mg . h/L (SD, 13 mg . h/L) (P < .001), and 70 mg . h/L (SD, 25 mg . h/L) versus 47 mg . h/L (SD, 17 mg . h/L) (P < .01) at week 2, month 1, and month 2, respectively. At all time points, patients cotreated with sirolimus had significantly higher dose-normalized mycophenolic acid AUC 0-12 values. At months 1 and 2, white blood cell counts were lower in the sirolimus group than in the cyclosporine group, as follows: 4.8 x 10(3)/mL (SD, 1.1 x 10(3)/mL) versus 6.5 x 10(3)/mL (SD, 2.2 x 10(3)/mL) (P < .01) at month 1 and 4.6 x 10(3)/mL (SD, 1.1 x 10(3)/mL) versus 5.9 x 10(3)/mL (SD, 2.0 x 10(3)/mL) (P < .05) at month 2. CONCLUSION: These data show that exposure to mycophenolic acid is higher in patients cotreated with sirolimus than in those cotreated with cyclosporine.
RCT Entities:
INTRODUCTION: Therapeutic drug monitoring of mycophenolate mofetil is recommended because of the interindividual variability in the exposition to its active moiety, mycophenolic acid. However, most of the pharmacokinetic studies involved patients cotreated with cyclosporine (INN, ciclosporin). METHODS: We analyzed the pharmacokinetics of mycophenolic acid in 13 renal graft recipients treated with sirolimus in an anticalcineurin-free regimen and compared it with that of 17 patients cotreated with cyclosporine. The area under the concentration versus time curve over a 12-hour period (AUC 0-12 ) of mycophenolic acid was estimated at 2 weeks, 1 month, 2 months, and 3 months after transplantation. RESULTS: At the first 3 time points, patients cotreated with sirolimus had significantly higher mycophenolic acid AUC 0-12 values compared with patients cotreated with cyclosporine, as follows: 81 mg . h/L (SD, 39 mg . h/L) versus 43 mg . h/L (SD, 11 mg . h/L) (P < .001), 72 mg . h/L (SD, 17 mg . h/L) versus 48 mg . h/L (SD, 13 mg . h/L) (P < .001), and 70 mg . h/L (SD, 25 mg . h/L) versus 47 mg . h/L (SD, 17 mg . h/L) (P < .01) at week 2, month 1, and month 2, respectively. At all time points, patients cotreated with sirolimus had significantly higher dose-normalized mycophenolic acid AUC 0-12 values. At months 1 and 2, white blood cell counts were lower in the sirolimus group than in the cyclosporine group, as follows: 4.8 x 10(3)/mL (SD, 1.1 x 10(3)/mL) versus 6.5 x 10(3)/mL (SD, 2.2 x 10(3)/mL) (P < .01) at month 1 and 4.6 x 10(3)/mL (SD, 1.1 x 10(3)/mL) versus 5.9 x 10(3)/mL (SD, 2.0 x 10(3)/mL) (P < .05) at month 2. CONCLUSION: These data show that exposure to mycophenolic acid is higher in patients cotreated with sirolimus than in those cotreated with cyclosporine.
Authors: Reinier M van Hest; Teun van Gelder; René Bouw; Timothy Goggin; Robert Gordon; Richard D Mamelok; Ron A Mathot Journal: Br J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2007-01-03 Impact factor: 4.335
Authors: Mark D Pescovitz; Flavio Vincenti; Marquis Hart; Larry Melton; John Whelchel; Shamkant Mulgaonkar; Diane McKay; Mimi Leung; Elizabeth Calleja; M René Bouw Journal: Br J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2007-06-06 Impact factor: 4.335
Authors: B Chaigne; P Gatault; F Darrouzain; C Barbet; D Degenne; M François; P Szymanski; N Rabot; G Golea; E Diot; F Maillot; Y Lebranchu; H Nivet; G Paintaud; J-M Halimi; L Guillevin; M Büchler Journal: Clin Exp Immunol Date: 2014-05 Impact factor: 4.330
Authors: Deirdre Hahn; Elisabeth M Hodson; Lorraine A Hamiwka; Vincent Ws Lee; Jeremy R Chapman; Jonathan C Craig; Angela C Webster Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2019-12-16