Literature DB >> 16002292

Differentiation of benign from malignant breast disease associated with screening detected microcalcifications using dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging.

P J Kneeshaw1, M Lowry, D Manton, A Hubbard, P J Drew, L W Turnbull.   

Abstract

Dynamic Contrast Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging (DCE-MRI) is an effective diagnostic modality for symptomatic breast disease. However, its role in evaluating clinically occult disease associated with mammographically detected microcalcification remains unclear. Women recalled following screening mammography with microcalcification had DCE-MRI examination of the breast. The data were evaluated subjectively and objectively using both empirical and 2-compartment pharmacokinetic modelling techniques to evaluate signal intensity parameters. Eighty-eight patients aged 50-75 years (median 58) were recruited. Comparing malignant and benign lesions, the mean values in arbitrary units for the enhancement index at 1 min in the most enhancing 9-pixel square +/-1 standard deviation were 0.61+/-0.40 vs. 0.22+/-0.26 p=<0.001 with sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV and accuracy of 80.0%, 82.4%, 57.1%, 93.3% and 81.8%, respectively. The corresponding values attained by the radiologist were 75.0%, 89.7%, 68.2%, 92.4% and 86.4%. DCE-MRI is able to differentiate malignant from benign clinically occult lesions associated with microcalcification and may therefore offer an alternative to open surgical biopsy for women with equivocal findings following initial triple assessment for microcalcification in the breast.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16002292     DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2005.05.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast        ISSN: 0960-9776            Impact factor:   4.380


  25 in total

1.  Non-contrast enhanced MRI for evaluation of breast lesions: comparison of non-contrast enhanced high spectral and spatial resolution (HiSS) images versus contrast enhanced fat-suppressed images.

Authors:  Milica Medved; Xiaobing Fan; Hiroyuki Abe; Gillian M Newstead; Abbie M Wood; Akiko Shimauchi; Kirti Kulkarni; Marko K Ivancevic; Lorenzo L Pesce; Olufunmilayo I Olopade; Gregory S Karczmar
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2011-10-01       Impact factor: 3.173

2.  Biologic significance of false-positive magnetic resonance imaging enhancement in the setting of ductal carcinoma in situ.

Authors:  Anjali S Kumar; Daniel F Chen; Alfred Au; Yunn-Yi Chen; Jessica Leung; Elisabeth R Garwood; Jessica Gibbs; Nola Hylton; Laura J Esserman
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 2.565

3.  The clinical value of bilateral breast MR imaging: is it worth performing on patients showing suspicious microcalcifications on mammography?

Authors:  Ayano Akita; Akihiro Tanimoto; Hiromitsu Jinno; Kaori Kameyama; Sachio Kuribayashi
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2009-04-07       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Imaging studies for the early detection of breast cancer.

Authors:  Sylvia H Heywang-Köbrunner; Ingrid Schreer; Walter Heindel; Alexander Katalinic
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2008-08-04       Impact factor: 5.594

5.  Treatment for displacement of PAAG mixture after injection augmentation mammoplasty.

Authors:  Liang Chen; Liu Sha; Shu-Peng Huang; Shi-Rong Li; Zhen-Xiang Wang
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-03-15

6.  US and MRI in the evaluation of mammographic BI-RADS 4 and 5 microcalcifications.

Authors:  Ana Hrkac Pustahija; Gordana Ivanac; Boris Brkljacic
Journal:  Diagn Interv Radiol       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 2.630

7.  Diffusion-weighted imaging improves the diagnostic accuracy of conventional 3.0-T breast MR imaging.

Authors:  Riham H Ei Khouli; Michael A Jacobs; Sarah D Mezban; Peng Huang; Ihab R Kamel; Katarzyna J Macura; David A Bluemke
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 8.  Fat Grafting in Breast Reconstruction.

Authors:  Acara Turner; Amjed Abu-Ghname; Matthew J Davis; Sebastian J Winocour; Summer E Hanson; Carrie K Chu
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2020-02-15       Impact factor: 2.314

9.  Can magnetic resonance imaging obviate the need for biopsy for microcalcifications?

Authors:  Shinya Yamamoto; Takashi Chishima
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2017-08

10.  MRI-guided vacuum-assisted breast biopsy: a phantom and patient evaluation of targeting accuracy.

Authors:  Riham H El Khouli; Katarzyna J Macura; Peter B Barker; Laila M Elkady; Michael A Jacobs; Jens Vogel-Claussen; David A Bluemke
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 4.813

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.