Literature DB >> 16001618

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: analytical study of 1208 cases.

Salam Daradkeh1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS: To review our experience and to compare it with similar series published in the literature with emphasis on the safety, the rate of conversion, the mortality and the morbidity of the procedure.
METHODOLOGY: From January 1994 to February 2003, the files of 1208 cases of laparoscopic cholecystectomy were retrospectively analyzed; the technique of surgery as well as the associated co-morbid conditions, the rate of conversion to open cholecystectomy, and the morbidity and mortality was analyzed and compared to other series. Simple descriptive statistics were used.
RESULTS: The average age was 47.2 +/- 15.1 years (4-94), there were 878 (72.7%) females and 330 (27.3%) males. Of this series 20 patients underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy while pregnant, 576 (48%) of the patients had co-morbid conditions. Conversion to open cholecystectomy was required in 32 (2.6%) cases and 25 (2.1%) patients had complications but no single biliary tract injury was noted. One patient died and his death was not directly related to the procedure. The average hospital stay was 2.8 (0.5-35) days.
CONCLUSIONS: With patience and meticulous technique laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the third millennium is safer and quicker than open cholecystectomy. Our results compare favorably with those published to date.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16001618

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hepatogastroenterology        ISSN: 0172-6390


  6 in total

1.  Is fourth port really required in laparoscopic cholecystectomy?

Authors:  Mushtaq Chalkoo; Shahnawaz Ahangar; Abdul Munnon Durrani
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2010-11-18       Impact factor: 0.656

2.  Twenty years after Erich Muhe: Persisting controversies with the gold standard of laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Kalpesh Jani; P S Rajan; K Sendhilkumar; C Palanivelu
Journal:  J Minim Access Surg       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 1.407

3.  Bleeding complications in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: Incidence, mechanisms, prevention and management.

Authors:  Robin Kaushik
Journal:  J Minim Access Surg       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 1.407

4.  The point of conversion in laparoscopic colonic surgery affects the oncologic outcome in an experimental rat model.

Authors:  Martin A Thome; David Ehrlich; Robert Koesters; Beat Müller-Stich; Frank Unglaub; Ulf Hinz; Markus W Büchler; Carsten N Gutt
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-06-05       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Feasibility and Safety of Three-Port Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Compared to Four-Port Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Mohd Yunus Shah; Umeshraj Somasundaram; TRVRaju Wilkinson; Nitin Wasnik
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2021-11-29

6.  Three-port versus four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy in acute and chronic cholecystitis.

Authors:  Dhafir Al-Azawi; Nariman Houssein; Abu Bakir Rayis; Donal McMahon; Dermot J Hehir
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2007-06-13       Impact factor: 2.102

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.