Literature DB >> 18528621

The point of conversion in laparoscopic colonic surgery affects the oncologic outcome in an experimental rat model.

Martin A Thome1, David Ehrlich, Robert Koesters, Beat Müller-Stich, Frank Unglaub, Ulf Hinz, Markus W Büchler, Carsten N Gutt.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Approximately 20% of laparoscopic colonic tumor resections result in conversion to open surgery. This result may be related to an increased risk in terms of the oncologic outcome. This study aimed to investigate the oncologic consequences of early and late conversion in laparoscopic colonic surgery.
METHODS: For this study, 45 male WAG-Rij rats were randomized into three operation groups of 15 animals each: laparotomy (LT group), laparoscopy followed by early conversion after 20 min (EC group), and laparoscopy followed by late conversion after 40 min (LC group). The total procedure time for the LT and EC groups was 60 min, compared with 80 min for the LC group. Hematogenous metastatic spread was induced in each operation group by tumor cell inoculation of a rat colon adenocarcinoma (CC 531) into the portal vein after 15 min of surgical intervention. A cecal resection was performed after 30 min in the LT and EC groups and after 50 min in the LC group. On day 28 after surgery, hepatic tumor growth was evaluated by measuring the diameter of tumor nodules, the tumor volume, the weight of the liver, and the cancer index.
RESULTS: Hepatic tumor volume was significantly increased after LC than after EC (p = 0.01) and LT (p = 0.04). The liver weights in the LC group were significantly higher than in the EC (p = 0.01) and LT (p = 0.01) groups. No significant difference between EC and LT was observed in any parameters surveyed.
CONCLUSION: The LC procedure resulted in greater tumor growth than EC and LT. The EC procedure did not lead to significantly more hepatic tumor growth than the same procedure performed using the conventional open technique. From the oncologic point of view, an early decision for conversion must be recommended as soon as any prolonged operating time has to be hypothesized.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18528621     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-008-9971-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  33 in total

1.  Converted laparoscopic colorectal surgery.

Authors:  P Gervaz; A Pikarsky; M Utech; M Secic; J Efron; B Belin; A Jain; S Wexner
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2001-05-11       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Standardized technique of laparoscopic surgery in the rat.

Authors:  C N Gutt; V Riemer; C Brier; R Berguer; V Paolucci
Journal:  Dig Surg       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 2.588

3.  Long-term survival after laparoscopic colon resection for cancer: complete five-year follow-up.

Authors:  Henry J Lujan; Gustavo Plasencia; Moises Jacobs; Manuel Viamonte; Rene F Hartmann
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 4.585

4.  Impact of gas(less) laparoscopy and laparotomy on peritoneal tumor growth and abdominal wall metastases.

Authors:  N D Bouvy; R L Marquet; H Jeekel; H J Bonjer
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Impact of laparoscopic surgery on experimental hepatic metastases.

Authors:  C N Gutt; V Riemer; Z G Kim; J Erceg; M Lorenz
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 6.939

Review 6.  Alterations in the immune system and tumor growth in laparoscopy.

Authors:  J E Hartley; B J Mehigan; J R Monson
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2000-12-12       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer.

Authors:  Heidi Nelson; Daniel J Sargent; H Sam Wieand; James Fleshman; Mehran Anvari; Steven J Stryker; Robert W Beart; Michael Hellinger; Richard Flanagan; Walter Peters; David Ota
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-05-13       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  The impact of carbon dioxide and helium insufflation on experimental liver metastases, macrophages, and cell adhesion molecules.

Authors:  C N Gutt; T Gessmann; P Schemmer; A Mehrabi; Th Schmandra; Z-G Kim
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-07-21       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Laparoscopy as a prognostic factor in curative resection for node positive colorectal cancer: results for a single-institution nonrandomized prospective trial.

Authors:  L Capussotti; P Massucco; A Muratore; M Amisano; C Bima; D Zorzi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-05-27       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Interferon treatment of a transplantable rat colon adenocarcinoma: importance of tumor site.

Authors:  R L Marquet; D L Westbroek; J Jeekel
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  1984-05-15       Impact factor: 7.396

View more
  1 in total

1.  Development of a standardized laparoscopic caecum resection model to simulate laparoscopic appendectomy in rats.

Authors:  Philipp Lingohr; Jonas Dohmen; Hanno Matthaei; Timo Schwandt; Gun-Soo Hong; Nils Konieczny; Edwin Bölke; Sven Wehner; Jörg C Kalff
Journal:  Eur J Med Res       Date:  2014-06-17       Impact factor: 2.175

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.