Literature DB >> 15999365

Safely reducing length of stay after open radical retropubic prostatectomy under the guidance of a clinical care pathway.

Sam S Chang1, Emily Cole, Joseph A Smith, Roxelyn Baumgartner, Nancy Wells, Michael S Cookson.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Collaborative care pathways have proven to be a safe and effective method of decreasing length of hospital stay (LOS) and costs after radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP). In the current study, the authors evaluated the safety and efficacy of a pathway transitioning from a 3-day to a 2-day LOS.
METHODS: The authors performed a retrospective chart review of 994 patients who underwent RRP at the study institution between July 1994 and December 2001. A total of 561 patients were managed on a 3-day LOS pathway, 172 were managed during the transition period from 3 to 2 days, and 261 were managed on a 2-day LOS pathway. Statistical analysis was performed comparing preoperative variables and complications among the three groups.
RESULTS: No statistically significant differences were found in comparisons of preoperative and demographic variables including age, race, medical comorbidities, preoperative prostate-specific antigen level, clinical stage of disease at presentation, and biopsy Gleason score. Forty-nine of the 561 patients (8.7%) remained longer than their targeted 3-day LOS, whereas 14 of 261 patients (5.4%) were hospitalized for longer than their targeted 2-day LOS, a difference that approached statistical significance (P = 0.058). During the transition period, 99 of 172 patients (57.6%) were discharged on postoperative Day 2 and 73 patients (42.4%) were discharged on postoperative Day 3. Complication rates were found to be significantly lower (P = 0.013) in the 2-day LOS group (2.3%) compared with the 3-day LOS group (7.0%) and the transition group (8.1%). The rate of readmission remained constant at 3% during this time period.
CONCLUSIONS: Overall, greater than 90% of patients were discharged within 2-3 days of surgery with acceptable complication rates, suggesting that in a consistent patient population, the transition from a 3-day LOS to a 2-day LOS can be done successfully without compromising patient safety. Evaluation currently is ongoing with regard to a 1-day LOS.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15999365     DOI: 10.1002/cncr.21233

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  7 in total

Review 1.  Critical comparison of laparoscopic, robotic, and open radical prostatectomy: techniques, outcomes, and cost.

Authors:  Matthew T Gettman; Michael L Blute
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 3.092

2.  Trends in immediate perioperative morbidity and delay in discharge after open and minimally invasive radical prostatectomy (RP): a 20-year institutional experience.

Authors:  Phillip M Pierorazio; Jeffrey K Mullins; Ashley E Ross; Elias S Hyams; Alan W Partin; Misop Han; Patrick C Walsh; Edward M Schaeffer; Christian P Pavlovich; Mohamad E Allaf; Trinity J Bivalacqua
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 5.588

3.  Improved outcomes with implementation of an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery pathway for patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery in the Philippines.

Authors:  Mayou Martin T Tampo; Mark Augustine S Onglao; Marc Paul J Lopez; Marie Dione P Sacdalan; Ma Concepcion L Cruz; Rosielyn T Apellido; Hermogenes J Monroy Iii
Journal:  Ann Coloproctol       Date:  2020-09-18

4.  A comparative study of fast-track versus [corrected] conventional surgery in patients undergoing laparoscopic radical cystectomy and ileal conduit diversion: Chinese experience.

Authors:  Xiao Guan; Longfei Liu; Xiang Lei; Xiongbing Zu; Yuan Li; Mingfen Chen; Long Wang; Lin Qi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2014-10-29       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Predictive factors for prolonged hospital stay after retropubic radical prostatectomy in a high-volume teaching center.

Authors:  Rafael F Coelho; Mauricio D Cordeiro; Guilherme P Padovani; Rafael Localli; Limirio Fonseca; José Pontes; Giuliano B Guglielmetti; Miguel Srougi; William Carlos Nahas
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2018 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.541

Review 6.  Radical prostatectomy: Hospital volumes and surgical volumes - does practice make perfect?

Authors:  Cydney Urbanek; Ryan Turpen; Charles J Rosser
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2009-06-06       Impact factor: 2.102

7.  Factors predicting hospital length-of-stay after radical prostatectomy: a population-based study.

Authors:  Maria Kelly; Linda Sharp; Fiona Dwane; Tracy Kelleher; Frances J Drummond; Harry Comber
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2013-07-02       Impact factor: 2.655

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.