Literature DB >> 15999291

The relationship between bone mineral density and biomechanics in patients with osteoporosis and scoliosis.

R Hank Routh1, Sara Rumancik, Ram D Pathak, Alan L Burshell, Eric A Nauman.   

Abstract

Nearly one-third of all women and one-sixth of all men over age 65 have osteoporosis, and this condition is often accompanied by lumbar scoliosis. Previous work has shown that, in a group of postmenopausal women with scoliosis and osteoporosis, both the bone mineral content (BMC) and bone mineral density (BMD) were greater on the concave side than the convex side. The goal of this study was to examine the structure-function relationships in the spines of patients with low bone mass and scoliosis using a patient-specific biomechanical model. We compared the percent change in BMC and the percent change in BMD with axial force, F(a), shear force, F(s), moment, M, local curvature, theta(rel), and the patient's age, A. We found that the percent change in BMC depended on the applied moment and the local curvature. The same dependence was observed for the percent change in BMD, but in this case, the shear force was also significantly inversely correlated. A population with femoral neck BMD with a T-score greater than -2.0 was similarly evaluated and yielded similar results. The percent change in BMD was related to M, theta(rel), A and negatively to the shear force. These results indicate that the osteoporotic spine is still able to respond to changes in the mechanical environment and provides a useful comparison between patients with osteoporosis and those with normal bone mass. In addition, this model may be a useful tool for the in vivo assessment of bone density changes in response to mechanical stimuli and drug treatments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15999291     DOI: 10.1007/s00198-005-1951-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoporos Int        ISSN: 0937-941X            Impact factor:   4.507


  15 in total

1.  Effects of mechanical forces on maintenance and adaptation of form in trabecular bone.

Authors:  R Huiskes; R Ruimerman; G H van Lenthe; J D Janssen
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-06-08       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 2.  Adult degenerative lumbar scoliosis.

Authors:  Scott D Daffner; Alexander R Vaccaro
Journal:  Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ)       Date:  2003-02

3.  A comparison of the microarchitectural bone adaptations of the concave and convex thoracic spinal facets in idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Kevin G Shea; Tyler Ford; Roy D Bloebaum; Jacques D'Astous; Howard King
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 5.284

4.  Mouse model for thoracic congenital scoliosis.

Authors:  F A Farley; R T Loder; B T Nolan; M T Dillon; E P Frankenburg; N A Kaciroti; J D Miller; S A Goldstein; R N Hensinger
Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop       Date:  2001 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.324

5.  No diffuse osteoporosis in lumbar scoliosis but lower femoral bone density on the convexity.

Authors:  D Hans; B Biot; A M Schott; P J Meunier
Journal:  Bone       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 4.398

6.  Scoliosis in the elderly.

Authors:  D W Vanderpool; J I James; R Wynne-Davies
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1969-04       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 7.  Epidemiology of osteoporosis.

Authors:  K Walker-Bone; E Dennison; C Cooper
Journal:  Rheum Dis Clin North Am       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 2.670

8.  Kyphosis does not equal vertebral fractures: the Rancho Bernardo study.

Authors:  Diane L Schneider; Denise von Mühlen; Elizabeth Barrett-Connor; David J Sartoris
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 4.666

9.  Meta-analysis of how well measures of bone mineral density predict occurrence of osteoporotic fractures.

Authors:  D Marshall; O Johnell; H Wedel
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-05-18

10.  Experimental scoliosis in an immature goat model: a method that creates idiopathic-type deformity with minimal violation of the spinal elements along the curve.

Authors:  John T Braun; James W Ogilvie; Ephraim Akyuz; Darrel S Brodke; Kent N Bachus; Raymond M Stefko
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2003-10-01       Impact factor: 3.468

View more
  8 in total

1.  Peer reviewed publications in 2005.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ochsner J       Date:  2006

2.  Longitudinal changes in lumbar bone mineral density distribution may increase the risk of wedge fractures.

Authors:  Hugo Giambini; Sundeep Khosla; Ahmad Nassr; Chunfeng Zhao; Kai-Nan An
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2012-11-08       Impact factor: 2.063

Review 3.  Degenerative Scoliosis.

Authors:  Philip J York; Han Jo Kim
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2017-12

4.  Anterior and posterior variations in mechanical properties of human vertebrae measured by nanoindentation.

Authors:  Hugo Giambini; Hua-Jun Wang; Chunfeng Zhao; Qingshan Chen; Ahmad Nassr; Kai-Nan An
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2012-11-23       Impact factor: 2.712

5.  The preventive and therapeutic roles of phytoestrogen α-Zearalanol on osteoporetic rats due to ovariectomization.

Authors:  Shaochun Li; Weiwei Zhang; Fei Duan; Weihua Liu; Xiaofang Sun; Xuefeng Pan
Journal:  Iran J Basic Med Sci       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 2.699

6.  Transient peak-strain matching partially recovers the age-impaired mechanoadaptive cortical bone response.

Authors:  Behzad Javaheri; Alessandra Carriero; Maria Wood; Roberto De Souza; Peter D Lee; Sandra Shefelbine; Andrew A Pitsillides
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-04-27       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Evaluation of vertebral bone mineral density in scoliosis by using quantitative computed tomography.

Authors:  Orkun Sarioglu; Sinem Gezer; Fatme Ceren Sarioglu; Nevin Koremezli; Tolga Kara; Omer Akcali; Dinc Ozaksoy; Ali Balci
Journal:  Pol J Radiol       Date:  2019-02-25

8.  New Horizons for Hydroxyapatite Supported by DXA Assessment-A Preliminary Study.

Authors:  Jakub Litak; Cezary Grochowski; Andrzej Rysak; Marek Mazurek; Tomasz Blicharski; Piotr Kamieniak; Piotr Wolszczak; Mansur Rahnama-Hezavah; Grzegorz Litak
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-26       Impact factor: 3.623

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.