Literature DB >> 15118044

A comparison of the microarchitectural bone adaptations of the concave and convex thoracic spinal facets in idiopathic scoliosis.

Kevin G Shea1, Tyler Ford, Roy D Bloebaum, Jacques D'Astous, Howard King.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A limited number of studies have assessed the changes in bone microarchitecture in spinal facets with use of light microscopy but not with use of electron microscopy techniques. The purpose of this study was to analyze the facets in patients with scoliosis to determine whether there are differences in the bone microarchitecture of contralateral facets at the same anatomic level.
METHODS: In eight patients undergoing posterior spinal arthrodesis for the treatment of idiopathic scoliosis, biopsy specimens of facet pairs at matched anatomic levels were obtained from three locations: (1). the curve apex, (2). one level cephalad to the apex, and (3). one level caudad to the apex. The facets were analyzed for cortical bone porosity and thickness with use of scanning electron microscopy and National Institutes of Health imaging software. The concave and convex facets were compared with use of a paired t test.
RESULTS: The mean porosity (and standard deviation) for the concave and convex facets was 16.5% +/- 5.8% and 24.1% +/- 6.2%, respectively. Those on the convex side were significantly more porous than those on the concave side (p <or= 0.03). The mean cortical width for the concave and convex facets was 798 +/- 266 microm and 377 +/- 124 micro m, respectively. The concave facets had a significantly thicker cortex than did the convex facets (p < 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that scoliotic deformities apply eccentric forces to spinal facets and that the concave and convex portions of the curve are subject to compression and tension forces, respectively. This analysis complements previous investigations of bone microarchitecture in animal models with use of a known compression-tension environment, and it suggests that the spinal facets remodel in a manner consistent with Wolff's law.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15118044     DOI: 10.2106/00004623-200405000-00017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  10 in total

1.  The relationship between bone mineral density and biomechanics in patients with osteoporosis and scoliosis.

Authors:  R Hank Routh; Sara Rumancik; Ram D Pathak; Alan L Burshell; Eric A Nauman
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2005-07-06       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  6th international conference on conservative management of spinal deformities.

Authors: 
Journal:  Scoliosis       Date:  2009-12-14

3.  Structural and micro-anatomical changes in vertebrae associated with idiopathic-type spinal curvature in the curveback guppy model.

Authors:  Kristen F Gorman; Gregory R Handrigan; Ge Jin; Rob Wallis; Felix Breden
Journal:  Scoliosis       Date:  2010-06-07

Review 4.  Low bone mineral status in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Xin-Feng Li; Hai Li; Zu-De Liu; Li-Yang Dai
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-08-28       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  The transformation of spinal curvature into spinal deformity: pathological processes and implications for treatment.

Authors:  Martha C Hawes; Joseph P O'brien
Journal:  Scoliosis       Date:  2006-03-31

6.  ptk7 mutant zebrafish models of congenital and idiopathic scoliosis implicate dysregulated Wnt signalling in disease.

Authors:  Madeline Hayes; Xiaochong Gao; Lisa X Yu; Nandina Paria; R Mark Henkelman; Carol A Wise; Brian Ciruna
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2014-09-03       Impact factor: 14.919

7.  Pressure distributions inside intervertebral discs under unilateral pedicle screw fixation in a porcine spine model.

Authors:  Zhao Meng; Chen Wang; Li-Jun Tian; Xue-Jun Zhang; Dong Guo; Yan Zou
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2018-10-16       Impact factor: 2.359

8.  Evaluation of vertebral bone mineral density in scoliosis by using quantitative computed tomography.

Authors:  Orkun Sarioglu; Sinem Gezer; Fatme Ceren Sarioglu; Nevin Koremezli; Tolga Kara; Omer Akcali; Dinc Ozaksoy; Ali Balci
Journal:  Pol J Radiol       Date:  2019-02-25

9.  Reliability of Hounsfield Unit for Assessing Asymmetrical Vertebral Bone Mass in Adult Degenerative Scoliosis.

Authors:  Lin-Yu Jin; Xin-Jin Su; Shuai Xu; Hai-Ying Liu; Xin-Feng Li
Journal:  Int J Gen Med       Date:  2022-06-30

10.  Vitamin D receptor gene (VDR) transcripts in bone, cartilage, muscles and blood and microarray analysis of vitamin D responsive genes expression in paravertebral muscles of juvenile and adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients.

Authors:  Roman Nowak; Justyna Szota; Urszula Mazurek
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2012-12-23       Impact factor: 2.362

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.