BACKGROUND: Executive dysfunctions in relatives of schizophrenic patients may be trait markers of genetic liability and thus help us to elucidate the aetiology of schizophrenia. As a large amount of data has been published, a synthesis through a meta-analysis was needed to demonstrate the existence of executive impairments in relatives of schizophrenic patients and to assess their magnitude. METHOD: We conducted a meta-analysis of articles that compared performances of controls and relatives of schizophrenic patients on the four tests most frequently used to assess executive functions: the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST), the Trail Making Test (TMT), the Stroop Test and the Verbal Fluency (VF) Test. When needed and possible, published data were supplemented with information from the authors. After assessing the homogeneity of the data, effect sizes were estimated and publication bias was tested by use of funnel plots. RESULTS: Relatives of schizophrenic patients performed less well than controls on all executive tests analysed. Effect estimates were in the small to moderate range (from 0.26 to 0.49) for Stroop, WCST and TMT, but were greater for the fluency tests (0.65 for phonological and 0.87 for semantic VF). CONCLUSION: Relatives of schizophrenic patients appear to have wide, although not severe, executive dysfunctions. As the sensitivity of the different tests for impairments in relatives is not the same, the choice of test and method used should be carefully assessed.
BACKGROUND: Executive dysfunctions in relatives of schizophrenicpatients may be trait markers of genetic liability and thus help us to elucidate the aetiology of schizophrenia. As a large amount of data has been published, a synthesis through a meta-analysis was needed to demonstrate the existence of executive impairments in relatives of schizophrenicpatients and to assess their magnitude. METHOD: We conducted a meta-analysis of articles that compared performances of controls and relatives of schizophrenicpatients on the four tests most frequently used to assess executive functions: the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST), the Trail Making Test (TMT), the Stroop Test and the Verbal Fluency (VF) Test. When needed and possible, published data were supplemented with information from the authors. After assessing the homogeneity of the data, effect sizes were estimated and publication bias was tested by use of funnel plots. RESULTS: Relatives of schizophrenicpatients performed less well than controls on all executive tests analysed. Effect estimates were in the small to moderate range (from 0.26 to 0.49) for Stroop, WCST and TMT, but were greater for the fluency tests (0.65 for phonological and 0.87 for semantic VF). CONCLUSION: Relatives of schizophrenicpatients appear to have wide, although not severe, executive dysfunctions. As the sensitivity of the different tests for impairments in relatives is not the same, the choice of test and method used should be carefully assessed.
Authors: Larry J Seidman; Anthony J Giuliano; Eric C Meyer; Jean Addington; Kristin S Cadenhead; Tyrone D Cannon; Thomas H McGlashan; Diana O Perkins; Ming T Tsuang; Elaine F Walker; Scott W Woods; Carrie E Bearden; Bruce K Christensen; Keith Hawkins; Robert Heaton; Richard S E Keefe; Robert Heinssen; Barbara A Cornblatt Journal: Arch Gen Psychiatry Date: 2010-06
Authors: Krista M Wisner; Brita Elvevåg; James M Gold; Daniel R Weinberger; Dwight Dickinson Journal: Schizophr Res Date: 2010-10-28 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: G Maroteaux; M Loos; S van der Sluis; B Koopmans; E Aarts; K van Gassen; A Geurts; D A Largaespada; B M Spruijt; O Stiedl; A B Smit; M Verhage Journal: Genes Brain Behav Date: 2012-08-02 Impact factor: 3.449