Literature DB >> 15995814

Laparoscopic treatment of recurrent pyogenic cholangitis.

Chung-Ngai Tang1, Chi-Kin Tai, Wing-Tai Siu, Joe P Y Ha, Ka-Kin Tsui, Michael K W Li.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND/
PURPOSE: We reviewed the selective use of hand-assisted laparoscopic segmentectomy (HALS) and laparoscopic choledochoduodenostomy (LCD) in the management of recurrent pyogenic cholangitis (RPC).
METHODS: We carried out a retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database of laparoscopic treatment of RPC during the period 1995 to 2004. The perioperative data were analyzed.
RESULTS: There were 33 laparoscopic procedures performed in 30 patients with RPC during the period 1995--2004. There were 23 female and 7 male patients, with a mean age of 63.2+/-14.9 years (range, 29--92 years). All these patients had a history of repeated attacks of cholangitis, and multiple sessions of endoscopic lithotripsy or operative retrieval had previously been attempted. Of these 33 procedures, there were 23 LCDs and 10 HALS. Three patients underwent simultaneous LCD and HALS in the same operation. The mean operative time was 172+/-63.5 min (range, 75--290 min) and there were three open conversions (10%), due to (1) intraoperative bleeding from the left hepatic vein, (2) lost broken tip of ultrasonic dissector, and (3) significant bleeding during choledochotomy, respectively. Average hospital stay was 11.4+/-11.1 days (range, 5--60 days). Eight complications (26.6%) were encountered, which included four bile leaks, three wound infections, and one intraabdominal collection. Complete stone clearance was achieved in all but 1 patient (rate, 96.6%), in whom the residual stones were extracted through a postoperative combined endoscopic and percutaneous approach. Long-term results were satisfactory, and only one stone recurrence was detected, upon a mean follow-up of 34.7 months (range, 1--107 months).
CONCLUSIONS: Both LCD and HALS are safe, feasible, and effective treatments for patients with RPC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15995814     DOI: 10.1007/s00534-004-0961-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg        ISSN: 0944-1166


  5 in total

1.  Hepatectomy with primary closure of common bile duct for hepatolithiasis combined with choledocholithiasis.

Authors:  Chang-Ku Jia; Jie Weng; You-Ke Chen; Qing-Zhuang Yang; Yu Fu; Qi-Fan Qin; Wei-Ming Yu
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-03-28       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Laparoscopic approach for right-sided intrahepatic duct stones: a comparative study of laparoscopic versus open treatment.

Authors:  Young Ki Kim; Ho-Seong Han; Yoo-Seok Yoon; Jai Young Cho; Woohyung Lee
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 3.  Training robotic hepatectomy: the Hong Kong experience and perspective.

Authors:  Eric C H Lai; Chung Ngai Tang
Journal:  Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 7.293

4.  Conventional laparoscopic and robot-assisted laparoscopic liver resection for benign and malignant pathologies: a cohort study.

Authors:  Eric C H Lai; Chung Ngai Tang; Michael K W Li
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2011-09-18

5.  Robotic Liver Resection For Primary Hepatolithiasis: Is It Beneficial?

Authors:  Kit-Fai Lee; Anthony K W Fong; Charing C N Chong; Sunny Y S Cheung; John Wong; Paul B S Lai
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 3.352

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.