Literature DB >> 15993624

Fate of unattended fearful faces in the amygdala is determined by both attentional resources and cognitive modulation.

Luiz Pessoa1, Srikanth Padmala, Thomas Morland.   

Abstract

The evidence for amygdala processing of emotional items outside the focus of attention is mixed. We hypothesized that differences in attentional demands may, at least in part, explain prior discrepancies. In the present study, attention was manipulated by parametrically varying the difficulty of a central task, allowing us to compare responses evoked by unattended emotion-laden faces while the attentional load of a central task was varied. Reduced responses to unattended emotional stimuli may also reflect an active suppression of amygdala responses during difficult non-emotional tasks (cognitive modulation). To explicitly assess cognitive modulation, an experimental condition was used in which subjects performed the central task without the presence of irrelevant emotional stimuli. Our findings revealed that amygdala responses were modulated by the focus of attention. Stronger responses were evoked during a sex task (when faces were attended) relative to a bar-orientation task (when faces were unattended). Critically, a valence effect was observed in the right amygdala during low attentional demand conditions, but not during medium or high demand conditions. Moreover, performing a difficult non-emotional task alone was associated with signal decreases in a network of brain regions, including the amygdala. Such robust decreases demonstrate that cognitive modulation comprises a powerful factor in determining amygdala responses. Collectively, our findings reveal that both attentional resources and cognitive modulation govern the fate of unattended fearful faces in the amygdala.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15993624      PMCID: PMC2427145          DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.05.048

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  24 in total

Review 1.  Mechanisms of visual attention in the human cortex.

Authors:  S Kastner; L G Ungerleider
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 12.449

2.  A default mode of brain function.

Authors:  M E Raichle; A M MacLeod; A Z Snyder; W J Powers; D A Gusnard; G L Shulman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-01-16       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Transient interference of right hemispheric function due to automatic emotional processing.

Authors:  K M Hartikainen; K H Ogawa; R T Knight
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 3.139

4.  A general statistical analysis for fMRI data.

Authors:  K J Worsley; C H Liao; J Aston; V Petre; G H Duncan; F Morales; A C Evans
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  Detection versus estimation in event-related fMRI: choosing the optimal stimulus timing.

Authors:  Rasmus M Birn; Robert W Cox; Peter A Bandettini
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  Effects of attention and emotion on face processing in the human brain: an event-related fMRI study.

Authors:  P Vuilleumier; J L Armony; J Driver; R J Dolan
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 17.173

7.  Orienting to exogenous cues and attentional bias to affective pictures reflect separate processes.

Authors:  J Tipples; D Sharma
Journal:  Br J Psychol       Date:  2000-02

8.  Integration of emotion and cognition in the lateral prefrontal cortex.

Authors:  Jeremy R Gray; Todd S Braver; Marcus E Raichle
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-03-19       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Emotional modulation of cognitive control: approach-withdrawal states double-dissociate spatial from verbal two-back task performance.

Authors:  J R Gray
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2001-09

Review 10.  Searching for a baseline: functional imaging and the resting human brain.

Authors:  D A Gusnard; M E Raichle; M E Raichle
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 34.870

View more
  129 in total

1.  High negative valence does not protect emotional event-related potentials from spatial inattention and perceptual load.

Authors:  Stefan Wiens; Tanaz Molapour; Judith Overfeld; Anders Sand
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 3.282

2.  Beyond arousal and valence: the importance of the biological versus social relevance of emotional stimuli.

Authors:  Michiko Sakaki; Kazuhisa Niki; Mara Mather
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 3.282

3.  Neural mechanisms underlying the higher levels of subjective well-being in extraverts: pleasant bias and unpleasant resistance.

Authors:  Jiajin Yuan; Jinfu Zhang; Xiaolin Zhou; Jiemin Yang; Xianxin Meng; Qinglin Zhang; Hong Li
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 3.282

Review 4.  The modification of attentional bias to emotional information: A review of the techniques, mechanisms, and relevance to emotional disorders.

Authors:  Michael Browning; Emily A Holmes; Catherine J Harmer
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 3.282

5.  Reduced dorsal anterior cingulate cortical activity during emotional regulation and top-down attentional control in generalized social phobia, generalized anxiety disorder, and comorbid generalized social phobia/generalized anxiety disorder.

Authors:  Karina S Blair; Marilla Geraci; Bruce W Smith; Nick Hollon; Jeffrey DeVido; Marcela Otero; James R Blair; Daniel S Pine
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2012-05-15       Impact factor: 13.382

6.  fMRI predictors of treatment outcome in pediatric anxiety disorders.

Authors:  Erin B McClure; Abby Adler; Christopher S Monk; Jennifer Cameron; Samantha Smith; Eric E Nelson; Ellen Leibenluft; Monique Ernst; Daniel S Pine
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2006-09-14       Impact factor: 4.530

7.  The impact of processing load on emotion.

Authors:  D G V Mitchell; M Nakic; D Fridberg; N Kamel; D S Pine; R J R Blair
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2006-12-11       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  Stress shifts brain activation towards ventral 'affective' areas during emotional distraction.

Authors:  Nicole Y L Oei; Ilya M Veer; Oliver T Wolf; Philip Spinhoven; Serge A R B Rombouts; Bernet M Elzinga
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2011-04-14       Impact factor: 3.436

9.  Incongruence effects in crossmodal emotional integration.

Authors:  Veronika I Müller; Ute Habel; Birgit Derntl; Frank Schneider; Karl Zilles; Bruce I Turetsky; Simon B Eickhoff
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2010-10-23       Impact factor: 6.556

10.  Load-dependent modulation of affective picture processing.

Authors:  Fátima Smith Erthal; Letícia de Oliveira; Izabela Mocaiber; Mirtes Garcia Pereira; Walter Machado-Pinheiro; Eliane Volchan; Luiz Pessoa
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 3.282

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.