Literature DB >> 15993531

Studying physician effects on patient outcomes: physician interactional style and performance on quality of care indicators.

Peter Franks1, Anthony F Jerant, Kevin Fiscella, Cleveland G Shields, Daniel J Tancredi, Ronald M Epstein.   

Abstract

Many prior studies which suggest a relationship between physician interactional style and patient outcomes may have been confounded by relying solely on patient reports, examining very few patients per physician, or not demonstrating evidence of a physician effect on the outcomes. We examined whether physician interactional style, measured both by patient report and objective encounter ratings, is related to performance on quality of care indicators. We also tested for the presence of physician effects on the performance indicators. Using data on 100 US primary care physician (PCP) claims data on 1,21,606 of their managed care patients, survey data on 4746 of their visiting patients, and audiotaped encounters of 2 standardized patients with each physician, we examined the relationships between claims-based quality of care indicators and both survey-derived patient perceptions of their physicians and objective ratings of interactional style in the audiotaped standardized patient encounters. Multi-level models examined whether physician effects (variance components) on care indicators were mediated by patient perceptions or objective ratings of interactional style. We found significant physician effects associated with glycohemoglobin and cholesterol testing. There was also a clinically significant association between better patient perceptions of their physicians and more glycohemoglobin testing. Multi-level analyses revealed, however, that the physician effect on glycohemoglobin testing was not mediated by patient perceived physician interaction style. In conclusion, similar to prior studies, we found evidence of an apparent relationship between patient perceptions of their physician and patient outcomes. However, the apparent relationships found in this study between patient perceptions of their physicians and patient care processes do not reflect physician style, but presumably reflect unmeasured patient confounding. Multi-level modeling may contribute to better understanding of the relationships between physician style and patient outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15993531     DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.05.027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Med        ISSN: 0277-9536            Impact factor:   4.634


  23 in total

1.  The association of perceived provider-patient communication and relationship quality with colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  Meghan L Underhill; Marc T Kiviniemi
Journal:  Health Educ Behav       Date:  2011-10-10

2.  Patient-centered care: the influence of patient and resident physician gender and gender concordance in primary care.

Authors:  Klea D Bertakis; Rahman Azari
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2011-12-07       Impact factor: 2.681

3.  Weight's up? Predictors of weight-related communication during primary care visits with overweight adolescents.

Authors:  Kathryn I Pollak; Cynthia J Coffman; Stewart C Alexander; Truls Østbye; Pauline Lyna; James A Tulsky; Alicia Bilheimer; Rowena J Dolor; Pao-Hwa Lin; Michael E Bodner; Terrill Bravender
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2014-07-30

4.  Ratings of physician communication by real and standardized patients.

Authors:  Kevin Fiscella; Peter Franks; Malathi Srinivasan; Richard L Kravitz; Ronald Epstein
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2007 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.166

5.  Predictors of weight loss communication in primary care encounters.

Authors:  Kathryn I Pollak; Cynthia J Coffman; Stewart C Alexander; Justin R E Manusov; Truls Ostbye; James A Tulsky; Pauline Lyna; Iguehi Esoimeme; Rebecca J Namenek Brouwer; Rowena J Dolor
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2011-04-07

6.  In-office discussions of migraine: results from the American Migraine Communication Study.

Authors:  Richard B Lipton; Steven R Hahn; Roger K Cady; Jan Lewis Brandes; Suzanne E Simons; Philip A Bain; Meaghan R Nelson
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2008-05-06       Impact factor: 5.128

7.  Evaluating the content of the communication items in the CAHPS(®) clinician and group survey and supplemental items with what high-performing physicians say they do.

Authors:  Denise D Quigley; Steven C Martino; Julie A Brown; Ron D Hays
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 3.883

8.  Assessing Patients' Perceptions of Clinician Communication: Acceptability of Brief Point-of-Care Surveys in Primary Care.

Authors:  Eileen M Dryden; Justeen K Hyde; Jolie B Wormwood; Juliet Wu; Rodney Calloway; Sarah L Cutrona; Glyn Elwyn; Gemmae M Fix; Michelle B Orner; Stephanie L Shimada; Barbara G Bokhour
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2020-08-03       Impact factor: 5.128

9.  Specialties differ in which aspects of doctor communication predict overall physician ratings.

Authors:  Denise D Quigley; Marc N Elliott; Donna O Farley; Q Burkhart; Samuel A Skootsky; Ron D Hays
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2013-10-26       Impact factor: 5.128

10.  Anesthesiologist Age and Sex Influence Patient Perceptions of Physician Competence.

Authors:  Katherine T Forkin; Lauren K Dunn; Naveen C Kotha; Allison J Bechtel; Amanda M Kleiman; Julie L Huffmyer; Stephen R Collins; Genevieve R Lyons; Jennie Z Ma; Edward C Nemergut
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2021-01-01       Impact factor: 7.892

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.