OBJECTIVE: The primary objective was to conduct a detailed analysis of individual variation in psychological morbidity in the year following surgery for breast cancer. The salience of the patients' "illness perceptions" to morbidity was examined as a secondary objective. METHODS:Psychological morbidity was assessed with the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-28) in a prospective study of 371 women having surgery for primary breast cancer. Patients also completed the Illness Perception Questionnaire (IPQ), Mental Adjustment to Cancer Scale (MAC) and the Eysenck Personality Scales (EPS). Assessments were made postoperatively and at 3, 6 and 12 months after surgery. RESULTS: Whilst descriptive statistics indicated a general reduction in mean distress over the 12-month follow-up, close analysis showed that a quarter of all patients maintained clinically significant levels of distress throughout the period. Patients with chronically elevated distress were characterised by higher levels of neuroticism, greater symptom awareness, more pain and poorer self-rated general health. In the regression analysis, psychological morbidity across the 1-year follow-up was predicted principally by the immediate postoperative state of distress, IPQ symptom awareness and the perceived time line of the illness, general health and, to a more minor extent, by neuroticism. CONCLUSION: There is marked individual variation in psychological morbidity in the year following breast cancer surgery, which is reliably predicted by the patient's immediate postoperative state of distress, her perception of the impact of the symptoms and the time line of the disease. Subgroups of patients with chronically high distress are characterised by factors including personality and negative perceptions and beliefs about their illness.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: The primary objective was to conduct a detailed analysis of individual variation in psychological morbidity in the year following surgery for breast cancer. The salience of the patients' "illness perceptions" to morbidity was examined as a secondary objective. METHODS: Psychological morbidity was assessed with the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-28) in a prospective study of 371 women having surgery for primary breast cancer. Patients also completed the Illness Perception Questionnaire (IPQ), Mental Adjustment to Cancer Scale (MAC) and the Eysenck Personality Scales (EPS). Assessments were made postoperatively and at 3, 6 and 12 months after surgery. RESULTS: Whilst descriptive statistics indicated a general reduction in mean distress over the 12-month follow-up, close analysis showed that a quarter of all patients maintained clinically significant levels of distress throughout the period. Patients with chronically elevated distress were characterised by higher levels of neuroticism, greater symptom awareness, more pain and poorer self-rated general health. In the regression analysis, psychological morbidity across the 1-year follow-up was predicted principally by the immediate postoperative state of distress, IPQ symptom awareness and the perceived time line of the illness, general health and, to a more minor extent, by neuroticism. CONCLUSION: There is marked individual variation in psychological morbidity in the year following breast cancer surgery, which is reliably predicted by the patient's immediate postoperative state of distress, her perception of the impact of the symptoms and the time line of the disease. Subgroups of patients with chronically high distress are characterised by factors including personality and negative perceptions and beliefs about their illness.
Authors: Qiuling Shi; Tenbroeck G Smith; Jared D Michonski; Kevin D Stein; Chiewkwei Kaw; Charles S Cleeland Journal: Cancer Date: 2011-04-14 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Cristiane Decat Bergerot; Hannah-Rose Mitchell; Kimlin Tam Ashing; Youngmee Kim Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2017-02-02 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Laura B Dunn; Bruce A Cooper; John Neuhaus; Claudia West; Steven Paul; Bradley Aouizerat; Gary Abrams; Janet Edrington; Debby Hamolsky; Christine Miaskowski Journal: Health Psychol Date: 2011-07-04 Impact factor: 4.267
Authors: Marianna Kyranou; Kathleen Puntillo; Laura B Dunn; Bradley E Aouizerat; Steven M Paul; Bruce A Cooper; John Neuhaus; Claudia West; Marylin Dodd; Christine Miaskowski Journal: Cancer Nurs Date: 2014 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 2.592
Authors: Suzanne C Danhauer; Gregory B Russell; Richard G Tedeschi; Michelle T Jesse; Tanya Vishnevsky; Kristin Daley; Suzanne Carroll; Kelli N Triplett; Lawrence G Calhoun; Arnie Cann; Bayard L Powell Journal: J Clin Psychol Med Settings Date: 2013-03
Authors: Kathryn J Schlich-Bakker; Margreet G E M Ausems; Maria Schipper; Herman F J Ten Kroode; Carla C Wárlám-Rodenhuis; Jan van den Bout Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2007-08-03 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: Margreet Scharloo; Robert J Baatenburg de Jong; Ton P M Langeveld; Els van Velzen-Verkaik; Margreet M Doorn-Op den Akker; Adrian A Kaptein Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2009-08-29 Impact factor: 3.603