Literature DB >> 15991112

Predicting pressure ulcer risk with the modified Braden, Braden, and Norton scales in acute care hospitals in Mainland China.

Enid Kwong1, Samantha Pang, Thomas Wong, Jacqueline Ho, Xue Shao-ling, Tao Li-jun.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to develop a modified Braden scale, to evaluate its predictive validity, and to identify a more valid pressure ulcer risk calculator for application in acute care hospitals in Mainland China among the modified Braden, Braden, and Norton scales. The initial modified Braden scale, with the addition of skin type and body build for height, was proposed in this study. Four hundred twenty-nine subjects who were admitted to two acute care hospitals in Mainland China within 24 hr and free of pressure ulcers upon admission were assessed with the initial modified Braden, Braden, and Norton scales by three nurse assessors. This was followed by a daily skin assessment to note any pressure ulcer by a nurse assessor. Nine subjects had pressure ulcers detected at Stages I (89%) and II (11%) after an average stay of 11 days. The descriptive analysis of each subscale scoring item in the initial modified Braden scale indicated that skin type and body build for height were the most distinct predictive factors whereas nutrition was the least distinct factor for predicting pressure ulcer development. Based on these findings, the modified Braden scale was further developed with the addition of skin type and body build for height and by exclusion of nutrition. The predictive validity test reported that the modified Braden scale demonstrated a better balance of sensitivity (89%) and specificity (75%) at a cutoff score of 16, with a higher positive predictive value (7%), than the Braden and Norton scales. This finding revealed that for this sample, the modified Braden scale is more effective in pressure ulcer risk prediction than the other two scales. Because the modified Braden scale is not 100% sensitive and specific, to increase clinical efficacy in the prevention of pressure ulcer, it is recommended that it be adopted combined with nursing judgment to predict pressure ulcer development in acute care settings in Mainland China.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15991112     DOI: 10.1016/j.apnr.2005.01.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Nurs Res        ISSN: 0897-1897            Impact factor:   2.257


  9 in total

1.  Design and research on reliability-validity for 3S intraoperative risk assessment scale of pressure sore.

Authors:  Xing-Lian Gao; Juan-Juan Hu; Qiong Ma; He-Yu Wu; Zeng-Yan Wang; Ting-Ting Li; Jian-Hui Shen; Ying Yang
Journal:  J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci       Date:  2015-04-16

2.  Data mining techniques for assisting the diagnosis of pressure ulcer development in surgical patients.

Authors:  Chao-Ton Su; Pa-Chun Wang; Yan-Cheng Chen; Li-Fei Chen
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2011-04-19       Impact factor: 4.460

3.  Study protocol of a cluster randomized controlled trial evaluating the efficacy of a comprehensive pressure ulcer prevention programme for private for-profit nursing homes.

Authors:  Enid Wai-yung Kwong; Paul Hong Lee; Kwan-mo Yeung
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2016-01-18       Impact factor: 3.921

4.  Using cognitive pre-testing methods in the development of a new evidenced-based pressure ulcer risk assessment instrument.

Authors:  S Coleman; J Nixon; J Keen; D Muir; L Wilson; E McGinnis; N Stubbs; C Dealey; E A Nelson
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2016-11-16       Impact factor: 4.615

5.  Improvement of pressure ulcer prevention care in private for-profit residential care homes: an action research study.

Authors:  Enid Wy Kwong; Maria Sy Hung; Kevin Woo
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2016-11-25       Impact factor: 3.921

6.  Clinical evaluation of a new pressure ulcer risk assessment instrument, the Pressure Ulcer Risk Primary or Secondary Evaluation Tool (PURPOSE T).

Authors:  Susanne Coleman; Isabelle L Smith; Elizabeth McGinnis; Justin Keen; Delia Muir; Lyn Wilson; Nikki Stubbs; Carol Dealey; Sarah Brown; E Andrea Nelson; Jane Nixon
Journal:  J Adv Nurs       Date:  2017-09-28       Impact factor: 3.187

7.  The association between major complications of immobility during hospitalization and quality of life among bedridden patients: A 3 month prospective multi-center study.

Authors:  Xinjuan Wu; Zhen Li; Jing Cao; Jing Jiao; Yingli Wang; Ge Liu; Ying Liu; Fangfang Li; Baoyun Song; Jingfen Jin; Yilan Liu; Xianxiu Wen; Shouzhen Cheng; Xia Wan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-10-12       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  The Impact of Nursing Staffs' Working Conditions on the Quality of Care Received by Older Adults in Long-Term Residential Care Facilities: A Systematic Review of Interventional and Observational Studies.

Authors:  Elodie Perruchoud; Rafaël Weissbrodt; Henk Verloo; Claude-Alexandre Fournier; Audrey Genolet; Joëlle Rosselet Amoussou; Stéphanie Hannart
Journal:  Geriatrics (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-28

Review 9.  Assessing Predictive Validity of Pressure Ulcer Risk Scales- A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Seong-Hi Park; Hea Shoon Lee
Journal:  Iran J Public Health       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 1.429

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.