Literature DB >> 15990909

Age differences in treatment decision making for breast cancer in a sample of healthy women: the effects of body image and risk framing.

Kathleen M Romanek1, Kevin D McCaul, Ann K Sandgren.   

Abstract

PURPOSE/
OBJECTIVES: To examine the effects of age, body image, and risk framing on treatment decision making for breast cancer using a healthy population.
DESIGN: An experimental 2 (younger women, older women) X 2 (survival, mortality frame) between-groups design.
SETTING: Midwestern university. SAMPLE: Two groups of healthy women: 56 women ages 18-24 from undergraduate psychology courses and 60 women ages 35-60 from the university community.
METHODS: Healthy women imagined that they had been diagnosed with breast cancer and received information regarding lumpectomy versus mastectomy and recurrence rates. Participants indicated whether they would choose lumpectomy or mastectomy and why. MAIN RESEARCH VARIABLES: Age, framing condition, treatment choice, body image, and reasons for treatment decision.
FINDINGS: The difference in treatment selection between younger and older women was mediated by concern for appearance. No main effect for risk framing was found; however, older women were somewhat less likely to select lumpectomy when given a mortality frame.
CONCLUSIONS: Age, mediated by body image, influences treatment selection of lumpectomy versus mastectomy. Framing has no direct effect on treatment decisions, but younger and older women may be affected by risk information differently. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING: Nurses should provide women who recently have been diagnosed with breast cancer with age-appropriate information regarding treatment alternatives to ensure women's active participation in the decision-making process. Women who have different levels of investment in body image also may have different concerns about treatment, and healthcare professionals should be alert to and empathetic of such concerns.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15990909     DOI: 10.1188/05.ONF.799-806

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncol Nurs Forum        ISSN: 0190-535X            Impact factor:   2.172


  6 in total

Review 1.  Assessing the body image: relevance, application and instruments for oncological settings.

Authors:  Maria Antonietta Annunziata; Lorena Giovannini; Barbara Muzzatti
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2011-12-12       Impact factor: 3.603

2.  Winning or losing a bet and the perception of randomness.

Authors:  Leehu Zysberg; Shaul Kimhi
Journal:  J Gambl Stud       Date:  2013-03

3.  The Spanish version of the Body Image Scale (S-BIS): psychometric properties in a sample of breast and gynaecological cancer patients.

Authors:  Paloma Gómez-Campelo; Carmen Bragado-Álvarez; M José Hernández-Lloreda; M Luisa Sánchez-Bernardos
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2014-08-19       Impact factor: 3.603

4.  Impact of MRI-evaluated neoadjuvant chemotherapy response on change of surgical recommendation in breast cancer.

Authors:  Jeon-Hor Chen; Byron A Feig; David J-B Hsiang; John A Butler; Rita S Mehta; Shadfar Bahri; Orhan Nalcioglu; Min-Ying Su
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Evaluating the Effectiveness of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Reducing Mastectomy for Women With Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Jahan J Mohiuddin; Allison M Deal; Jennifer L Lund; Lisa A Carey; Brock R Baker; Timothy M Zagar; Ellen L Jones; Lawrence B Marks; Ronald C Chen
Journal:  JNCI Cancer Spectr       Date:  2017-09-23

6.  Patient age is related to decision-making, treatment selection, and perceived quality of life in breast cancer survivors.

Authors:  Terence T Sio; Kenneth Chang; Ritujith Jayakrishnan; Difu Wu; Mary Politi; Dominique Malacarne; James Saletnik; Maureen Chung
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2014-07-22       Impact factor: 2.754

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.