Literature DB >> 15989999

Selective mediastinal node irradiation based on FDG-PET scan data in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer: a prospective clinical study.

Dirk De Ruysscher1, Stofferinus Wanders, Erik van Haren, Monique Hochstenbag, Wiel Geeraedts, Irwan Utama, Jean Simons, Jo Dohmen, Ali Rhami, Ulrich Buell, Paul Thimister, Gabriel Snoep, Liesbeth Boersma, Tom Verschueren, Angela van Baardwijk, Andre Minken, Søren M Bentzen, Philippe Lambin.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the patterns of recurrence when selective mediastinal node irradiation based on FDG-PET scan data is used in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS AND MATERIALS: A prospective Phase I/II study was undertaken on 44 patients with NSCLC without detectable distant metastases on CT and FDG-PET scan, delivering either 61.2 Gy in 34 fractions over 23 days or 64.8 Gy in 36 fractions over 24 days (1.8 Gy b.i.d. with 8-h interval). Only the primary tumor and the positive mediastinal areas on the pretreatment FDG-PET scan were irradiated. Isolated nodal failure was defined as recurrence in the regional nodes outside of the clinical target volume, in the absence of in-field failure.
RESULTS: The CT and FDG-PET stage distribution was as follows: Stage I: 8 patients (18%) and 13 patients (29%); Stage II: 6 patients (14%) and 10 patients (23%); Stage IIIA: 15 patients (34%) and 7 patients (16%); Stage IIIB: 15 patients (34%) and 14 patients (32%), respectively. After a median follow-up time of 16 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 11-21 months) postradiotherapy, 11 patients (25%) developed a local recurrence. Only 1 patient (crude rate, 2.3%; upper bound of 95% CI, 10.3%), with a Stage II tumor on both CT and PET, developed an isolated nodal failure. The median actuarial overall survival was 21 months (95% CI, 14-28 months), and the median actuarial progression-free survival was 18 months (95% CI, 12-24 months).
CONCLUSIONS: Selective mediastinal node irradiation based on FDG-PET scan data in patients with NSCLC results in low isolated nodal failure rates. In the Phase I component of this trial, radiation dose escalation up to 64.8 Gy in 36 fractions over 24 days is feasible.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15989999     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2004.12.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  39 in total

1.  Evaluation of the spatial dependence of the point spread function in 2D PET image reconstruction using LOR-OSEM.

Authors:  D Wiant; J A Gersh; M Bennett; J D Bourland
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 2.  Imaging techniques for tumour delineation and heterogeneity quantification of lung cancer: overview of current possibilities.

Authors:  Wouter van Elmpt; Catharina M L Zegers; Marco Das; Dirk De Ruysscher
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 2.895

3.  A teaching intervention in a contouring dummy run improved target volume delineation in locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer: Reducing the interobserver variability in multicentre clinical studies.

Authors:  Tanja Schimek-Jasch; Esther G C Troost; Gerta Rücker; Vesna Prokic; Melanie Avlar; Viola Duncker-Rohr; Michael Mix; Christian Doll; Anca-Ligia Grosu; Ursula Nestle
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2015-02-10       Impact factor: 3.621

4.  Should patient setup in lung cancer be based on the primary tumor? An analysis of tumor coverage and normal tissue dose using repeated positron emission tomography/computed tomography imaging.

Authors:  Wouter van Elmpt; Michel Öllers; Philippe Lambin; Dirk De Ruysscher
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2010-11-17       Impact factor: 7.038

5.  An individualized radiation dose escalation trial in non-small cell lung cancer based on FDG-PET imaging.

Authors:  Marie Wanet; Antoine Delor; François-Xavier Hanin; Benoît Ghaye; Aline Van Maanen; Vincent Remouchamps; Christian Clermont; Samuel Goossens; John Aldo Lee; Guillaume Janssens; Anne Bol; Xavier Geets
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2017-07-21       Impact factor: 3.621

6.  Multidisciplinary consensus statement on the clinical management of patients with stage III non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  M Majem; J Hernández-Hernández; F Hernando-Trancho; N Rodríguez de Dios; A Sotoca; J C Trujillo-Reyes; I Vollmer; R Delgado-Bolton; M Provencio
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2019-06-06       Impact factor: 3.405

7.  Computer-aided diagnosis systems for lung cancer: challenges and methodologies.

Authors:  Ayman El-Baz; Garth M Beache; Georgy Gimel'farb; Kenji Suzuki; Kazunori Okada; Ahmed Elnakib; Ahmed Soliman; Behnoush Abdollahi
Journal:  Int J Biomed Imaging       Date:  2013-01-29

Review 8.  Anatomic, functional and molecular imaging in lung cancer precision radiation therapy: treatment response assessment and radiation therapy personalization.

Authors:  Michael MacManus; Sarah Everitt; Tanja Schimek-Jasch; X Allen Li; Ursula Nestle; Feng-Ming Spring Kong
Journal:  Transl Lung Cancer Res       Date:  2017-12

Review 9.  PET in the management of locally advanced and metastatic NSCLC.

Authors:  Willem Grootjans; Lioe-Fee de Geus-Oei; Esther G C Troost; Eric P Visser; Wim J G Oyen; Johan Bussink
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-04-28       Impact factor: 66.675

10.  Evaluation of the Metabolic Response to Cyclopamine Therapy in Pancreatic Cancer Xenografts Using a Clinical PET-CT System.

Authors:  Hany Kayed; Patrick Meyer; Yong He; Bettina Kraenzlin; Christian Fink; Norbert Gretz; Stefan O Schoenberg; Maliha Sadick
Journal:  Transl Oncol       Date:  2012-10-01       Impact factor: 4.243

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.