Literature DB >> 15989933

Visual letter matching: hemispheric functioning or scanning biases?

Jillian H Fecteau1, James T Enns.   

Abstract

Finding two mixed-case letters that share the same name is easier to do when the letters are presented in opposite visual fields than when they are both in the same field. By contrast, finding a match between two same-case letters is easier when they are in the same field. These visual field effects have been attributed to the ability of the corpus callosum to coordinate the work of the cerebral hemispheres [Banich, M. T. (1998). The missing link: The role of interhemispheric interaction in attentional processing. Brain and Cognition, 36, 128-157; Weissman, D. H., & Banich, M. T. (2000). The cerebral hemispheres cooperate to perform complex but not simple tasks. Neuropsychology, 14, 41-59]. The present study considers the alternative hypothesis that attentional scanning biases may be at work. Experiment 1 examined the effects of explicit instructions to scan items in a specific order; Experiment 2 examined influences of implicit location biasing; Experiment 3 considered the possibility that same-case letter matching is different because a perceptual grouping mechanism can be used in that task. In each experiment, we first interpreted the results within the hemispheric framework before considering the alternative accounts. We concluded that two scanning biases may be in effect: (1) an automatic bias favoring items in locations relatively distant from the current focus of attention and (2) a learned bias to scan letters in a left-to-right direction.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15989933     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2005.01.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychologia        ISSN: 0028-3932            Impact factor:   3.139


  4 in total

1.  Interhemispheric interaction expands attentional capacity in an auditory selective attention task.

Authors:  Paige E Scalf; Marie T Banich; Andrew B Erickson
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-03-01       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Using a filtering task to measure the spatial extent of selective attention.

Authors:  John Palmer; Cathleen M Moore
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2008-04-10       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Spatial asymmetries in viewing and remembering scenes: consequences of an attentional bias?

Authors:  Christopher A Dickinson; Helene Intraub
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  Brain lateralization and self-reported symptoms of ADHD in a population sample of adults: a dimensional approach.

Authors:  Saleh M H Mohamed; Norbert A Börger; Reint H Geuze; Jaap J van der Meere
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-09-22
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.