Literature DB >> 15988751

Saline irrigation does not affect bone formation or fixation strength of hydroxyapatite/tricalcium phosphate-coated implants in a rat model.

A De Ranieri1, A S Virdi, S Kuroda, K E Healy, N J Hallab, D R Sumner.   

Abstract

Intramembranous bone regeneration is critical to implant fixation. In cementless joint replacement (as opposed to cemented joint replacement), saline irrigation is not typically performed during surgery so that the osteogenic stimulus provided by the marrow is preserved. Several groups are now using the rat marrow ablation model to study intramembranous bone regeneration and implant fixation. In this model, the marrow contents are mechanically disrupted, and debris is often cleared by saline irrigation, a step that appears inconsistent with the clinical situation. Furthermore, in contrast to conventional wisdom, it has been reported that saline irrigation enhanced bone-implant contact and peri-implant bone formation in the rat model (Ishizaka et al. Bone 1996;19:589-594), although mechanical fixation of the implant was not investigated. Accordingly, the present study was performed to determine if saline irrigation leads to enhanced mechanical fixation of implants in the rat model. Forty-eight 400 to 450 g male rats were divided equally into two groups. The treatment group, in contrast to the control group, received saline irrigation in the ablated medullary canal prior to placement of hydroxyapatite/tricalcium phosphate-coated implants. Eight animals in each group were killed at 2, 4, or 8 weeks after implantation, at which time the specimens were analyzed by micro computed tomography to measure bone formation around the implant, followed by a mechanical pull-out test to measure the strength of fixation of the implant. As expected, there was increased fixation strength over time, but there were no significant differences in peri-implant bone volume, bone-implant contact, or implant fixation strength between the two groups. Thus, we found no effect of saline irrigation on bone formation or implant fixation strength in this study in which the implant had an osteoconductive coating. Copyright 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15988751     DOI: 10.1002/jbm.b.30293

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater        ISSN: 1552-4973            Impact factor:   3.368


  6 in total

1.  Intramembranous bone regeneration and implant placement using mechanical femoral marrow ablation: rodent models.

Authors:  Meghan M Moran; Kotaro Sena; Margaret A McNulty; D R Sumner; Amarjit S Virdi
Journal:  Bonekey Rep       Date:  2016-09-07

2.  Limitations of using micro-computed tomography to predict bone-implant contact and mechanical fixation.

Authors:  S Liu; J Broucek; A S Virdi; D R Sumner
Journal:  J Microsc       Date:  2011-09-15       Impact factor: 1.758

3.  Sclerostin antibody increases bone volume and enhances implant fixation in a rat model.

Authors:  Amarjit S Virdi; Min Liu; Kotaro Sena; James Maletich; Margaret McNulty; Hua Zhu Ke; Dale R Sumner
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2012-09-19       Impact factor: 5.284

4.  Temporal gene expression profiling during rat femoral marrow ablation-induced intramembranous bone regeneration.

Authors:  Joel K Wise; Kotaro Sena; Karen Vranizan; Jacob F Pollock; Kevin E Healy; W Frank Hughes; D Rick Sumner; Amarjit S Virdi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-10-01       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Freezing of rat tibiae at -20°c does not affect the mechanical properties of intramedullary bone/implant-interface: brief report.

Authors:  Michael Diefenbeck; Thomas Mückley; Sergiy Zankovych; Jörg Bossert; Klaus D Jandt; Christian Schrader; Jürgen Schmidt; Ulrich Finger; Mathilde Faucon
Journal:  Open Orthop J       Date:  2011-06-17

6.  Osteogenic benefits of low-intensity pulsed ultrasound and vibration in a rodent osseointegration model.

Authors:  David S Ruppert; Ola LA Harrysson; Denis J Marcellin-Little; Seth Bollenbecker; Paul S Weinhold
Journal:  J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact       Date:  2019-06-01       Impact factor: 2.041

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.