Literature DB >> 15987953

Dopamine cells respond to predicted events during classical conditioning: evidence for eligibility traces in the reward-learning network.

Wei-Xing Pan1, Robert Schmidt, Jeffery R Wickens, Brian I Hyland.   

Abstract

Behavioral conditioning of cue-reward pairing results in a shift of midbrain dopamine (DA) cell activity from responding to the reward to responding to the predictive cue. However, the precise time course and mechanism underlying this shift remain unclear. Here, we report a combined single-unit recording and temporal difference (TD) modeling approach to this question. The data from recordings in conscious rats showed that DA cells retain responses to predicted reward after responses to conditioned cues have developed, at least early in training. This contrasts with previous TD models that predict a gradual stepwise shift in latency with responses to rewards lost before responses develop to the conditioned cue. By exploring the TD parameter space, we demonstrate that the persistent reward responses of DA cells during conditioning are only accurately replicated by a TD model with long-lasting eligibility traces (nonzero values for the parameter lambda) and low learning rate (alpha). These physiological constraints for TD parameters suggest that eligibility traces and low per-trial rates of plastic modification may be essential features of neural circuits for reward learning in the brain. Such properties enable rapid but stable initiation of learning when the number of stimulus-reward pairings is limited, conferring significant adaptive advantages in real-world environments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15987953      PMCID: PMC6725057          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1478-05.2005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  33 in total

1.  Temporal difference model reproduces anticipatory neural activity.

Authors:  R E Suri; W Schultz
Journal:  Neural Comput       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 2.026

2.  Impulse activity of ventral tegmental area neurons during heroin self-administration in rats.

Authors:  E A Kiyatkin; G V Rebec
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 3.590

3.  Anticipatory responses of dopamine neurons and cortical neurons reproduced by internal model.

Authors:  R E Suri
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Spike-timing-dependent Hebbian plasticity as temporal difference learning.

Authors:  R P Rao; T J Sejnowski
Journal:  Neural Comput       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 2.026

5.  Discrete coding of reward probability and uncertainty by dopamine neurons.

Authors:  Christopher D Fiorillo; Philippe N Tobler; Wolfram Schultz
Journal:  Science       Date:  2003-03-21       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  A neural network model with dopamine-like reinforcement signal that learns a spatial delayed response task.

Authors:  R E Suri; W Schultz
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 3.590

Review 7.  Getting formal with dopamine and reward.

Authors:  Wolfram Schultz
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2002-10-10       Impact factor: 17.173

8.  Dopamine neurons report an error in the temporal prediction of reward during learning.

Authors:  J R Hollerman; W Schultz
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 24.884

9.  Dopamine responses comply with basic assumptions of formal learning theory.

Authors:  P Waelti; A Dickinson; W Schultz
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-07-05       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Firing modes of midbrain dopamine cells in the freely moving rat.

Authors:  B I Hyland; J N J Reynolds; J Hay; C G Perk; R Miller
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 3.590

View more
  187 in total

Review 1.  Glutamatergic signaling by midbrain dopaminergic neurons: recent insights from optogenetic, molecular and behavioral studies.

Authors:  Tibor Koos; Fatuel Tecuapetla; James M Tepper
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2011-05-31       Impact factor: 6.627

Review 2.  Learning from experience: event-related potential correlates of reward processing, neural adaptation, and behavioral choice.

Authors:  Matthew M Walsh; John R Anderson
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2012-06-07       Impact factor: 8.989

3.  Glutamatergic signaling by mesolimbic dopamine neurons in the nucleus accumbens.

Authors:  Fatuel Tecuapetla; Jyoti C Patel; Harry Xenias; Daniel English; Ibrahim Tadros; Fulva Shah; Joshua Berlin; Karl Deisseroth; Margaret E Rice; James M Tepper; Tibor Koos
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-05-19       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 4.  All that glitters ... dissociating attention and outcome expectancy from prediction errors signals.

Authors:  Matthew R Roesch; Donna J Calu; Guillem R Esber; Geoffrey Schoenbaum
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-06-16       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 5.  Opponency revisited: competition and cooperation between dopamine and serotonin.

Authors:  Y-Lan Boureau; Peter Dayan
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2010-09-29       Impact factor: 7.853

6.  Phasic mesolimbic dopamine signaling precedes and predicts performance of a self-initiated action sequence task.

Authors:  Kate M Wassum; Sean B Ostlund; Nigel T Maidment
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2012-02-02       Impact factor: 13.382

Review 7.  Dopamine reward circuitry: two projection systems from the ventral midbrain to the nucleus accumbens-olfactory tubercle complex.

Authors:  Satoshi Ikemoto
Journal:  Brain Res Rev       Date:  2007-05-17

8.  Individual differences in dopamine efflux in nucleus accumbens shell and core during instrumental learning.

Authors:  Jingjun Cheng; Matthijs G P Feenstra
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2006 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.460

Review 9.  What the orbitofrontal cortex does not do.

Authors:  Thomas A Stalnaker; Nisha K Cooch; Geoffrey Schoenbaum
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 24.884

Review 10.  Ventral pallidum roles in reward and motivation.

Authors:  Kyle S Smith; Amy J Tindell; J Wayne Aldridge; Kent C Berridge
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2008-10-08       Impact factor: 3.332

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.