Literature DB >> 15986959

Effect of solvent type on microtensile bond strength of a total-etch one-bottle adhesive system to moist or dry dentin.

Paula de Carvalho Cardoso1, Guilherme Carpena Lopes, Luiz Clovis Cardoso Vieira, Luiz Narciso Baratieri.   

Abstract

This study evaluated the effect of organic solvent (acetone or ethanol) on the microtensile bond strengths (MTBS) of an adhesive system applied to dry and moist dentin. Sixteen extracted human third molars were ground to expose a flat occlusal dentin surface and acid etched for 20 seconds (20% phosphoric acid gel, Gluma Etch 20 Gel, Heraeus/Kulzer). After rinsing the acid etchant, an ethanol-based one-bottle adhesive system was applied to the mesial half of the occlusal dentin surface. An acetone-based, one-bottle adhesive system was applied to the distal half of the ground dentin surface. The teeth were randomly assigned to groups. In Group 1, the etched dentin was thoroughly air dried and an ethanol-based one-bottle adhesive system was applied (Gluma Comfort Bond, Heraeus/Kulzer) (GCB). In Group 2, the etched dentin was thoroughly air dried and an acetone-based one-bottle adhesive system was applied (Gluma One Bond, Heraeus/Kulzer)(GOB). In Group 3, excess moisture was removed after acid etching, leaving a moist dentin surface and a one-bottle ethanol-based adhesive was applied (Gluma Comfort Bond). In Group 4, excess moisture was removed after acid etching, leaving a moist dentin surface and an acetone-based adhesive was applied (Gluma One Bond). A hybrid resin composite (Venus, Heraeus/Kulzer) was applied to the bonded surface in four 1-mm increments and light cured according to manufacturer's directions. The specimens were then sectioned with a slow-speed diamond saw in two perpendicular directions to obtain sticks with a cross-section of 0.5 +/- 0.05 mm2. The microtensile bond strength (MTBS) test was performed with a Bencor device in an Instron machine at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/minute. The data were subjected to a two-way ANOVA and Scheffé Post hoc test (p < 0.05). The experimental MTBS measured for dry dentin were Group 1 = 37.0 +/- 10.6 and Group 2 = 34.7 +/- 9.0 in MPa (mean +/- SD); and on moist dentin, Group 3 = 50.7 +/- 11.0 and Group 4 = 38.5 +/- 10.5 in MPa (mean +/- SD). The ethanol based adhesives resulted in higher MTBS than acetone-based adhesive (p < 0.008) and bonding to moist dentin resulted in higher MTBS (p < 0.001). GCB applied on moist dentin resulted in statistically higher bond strengths than the other groups. The highest MTBS were achieved with the use of an ethanol-based adhesive to moist dentin.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15986959

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oper Dent        ISSN: 0361-7734            Impact factor:   2.440


  4 in total

Review 1.  Deep proximal margin rebuilding with direct esthetic restorations: a systematic review of marginal adaptation and bond strength.

Authors:  Hoda S Ismail; Ashraf I Ali; Rabab El Mehesen; Jelena Juloski; Franklin Garcia-Godoy; Salah H Mahmoud
Journal:  Restor Dent Endod       Date:  2022-03-04

2.  Effect of Dentin Wetness on the Bond Strength of Universal Adhesives.

Authors:  An-Na Choi; Ji-Hye Lee; Sung-Ae Son; Kyoung-Hwa Jung; Yong Hoon Kwon; Jeong-Kil Park
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2017-10-25       Impact factor: 3.623

3.  Shear bond strengths of composite resin and giomer to mineral trioxide aggregate at different time intervals.

Authors:  Amir-Ahmad Ajami; Mahmoud Bahari; Arezoo Hassanpour-Kashani; Mehdi Abed-Kahnamoui; Ayda Savadi-Oskoee; Farhad Azadi-Oskoee
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2017-07-01

4.  Solvent type influences bond strength to air or blot-dried dentin.

Authors:  Özgür Irmak; İsmail Hakkı Baltacıoğlu; Nuran Ulusoy; Yıldırım Hakan Bağış
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2016-08-22       Impact factor: 2.757

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.