Literature DB >> 15985258

Health economics of hysterectomy.

Ray Garry1.   

Abstract

Health resources are finite, and it is increasingly necessary to practise medicine within defined budgets. Hysterectomy is recognized as one of the most frequently performed of all major surgical operations and is of great economic as well as medical and social importance. A full assessment of the value of an intervention requires consideration of both economic and clinical outcomes. New alternative therapies to uterine excision have been introduced, and new ways of performing hysterectomy have been developed. Cost-effectiveness analysis enables each of these approaches to be meaningfully compared. Using such analytic techniques, hysterectomy can be shown to be an effective and cost-effective intervention across a variety of indications. The vaginal route is the most cost-effective approach. There seems to be no obvious advantage in conserving or retaining the cervix, but there is as yet no evidence about the cost-effectiveness of concomitant oophorectomy.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15985258     DOI: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2005.01.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol        ISSN: 1521-6934            Impact factor:   5.237


  11 in total

Review 1.  Vaginal cuff dehiscence: risk factors and management.

Authors:  Beth Cronin; Vivian W Sung; Kristen A Matteson
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2011-08-27       Impact factor: 8.661

2.  Twenty-first century laparoscopic hysterectomy: should we not leave the vaginal step out?

Authors:  A R H Twijnstra; N A Kianmanesh Rad; M J G H Smeets; J F Admiraal; F W Jansen
Journal:  Gynecol Surg       Date:  2009-03-21

3.  Non-decent Vaginal Hysterectomy in Rural Setup of MP: A Poor Acceptance.

Authors:  Sapna B Jain; Kshma D Chandrakar
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India       Date:  2016-03-12

4.  Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery in gynecology: LESS is actually how much less?

Authors:  Priya Bhave Chittawar; Navneet Magon; Shilpa Bhandari
Journal:  J Midlife Health       Date:  2013-01

Review 5.  Fallopian tube prolapse after hysterectomy: a systematic review.

Authors:  Lobna Ouldamer; Agnès Caille; Gilles Body
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-07       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Impact of a Fellowship-Trained Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgeon on Patient Outcomes.

Authors:  Nisse V Clark; Harneet S Gujral; Kelly N Wright
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2017 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.172

7.  Robotic Hysterectomy for Benign Indications: What Have We Learned from a Decade?

Authors:  Marie Carbonnel; Gaby N Moawad; Mia Maria Tarazi; Aurelie Revaux; Titouan Kennel; Angéline Favre-Inhofer; Jean Marc Ayoubi
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2021 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.172

8.  Predictive factors of return to work after hysterectomy: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Suzanne J Dedden; Esther V A Bouwsma; Peggy M A J Geomini; Marlies Y Bongers; Judith A F Huirne
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2022-03-04       Impact factor: 2.102

Review 9.  Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease.

Authors:  Johanna W M Aarts; Theodoor E Nieboer; Neil Johnson; Emma Tavender; Ray Garry; Ben Willem J Mol; Kirsten B Kluivers
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-08-12

10.  Bridging different realities - a qualitative study on patients' experiences of preoperative care for benign hysterectomy and opportunistic salpingectomy in Sweden.

Authors:  Elin Collins; Maria Lindqvist; Ingrid Mogren; Annika Idahl
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2020-09-11       Impact factor: 2.809

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.