| Literature DB >> 15985187 |
Meriet Mikhail1, Bin Wang, Philippe Lemey, Brenda Beckthold, Anne-Mieke Vandamme, M John Gill, Nitin K Saksena.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The actual relationship between viral variability and HIV disease progression and/or non-progression can only be extrapolated through epidemiologically-linked HIV-infected cohorts. The rarity of such cohorts accents their existence as invaluable human models for a clear understanding of molecular factors that may contribute to the various rates of HIV disease. We present here a cohort of three patients with the source termed donor A--a non-progressor and two recipients called B and C. Both recipients gradually progressed to HIV disease and patient C has died of AIDS recently. By conducting 15 near full-length genome (8.7 kb) analysis from longitudinally derived patient PBMC samples enabled us to investigate the extent of molecular factors, which govern HIV disease progression.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2005 PMID: 15985187 PMCID: PMC1190217 DOI: 10.1186/1742-4690-2-41
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Retrovirology ISSN: 1742-4690 Impact factor: 4.602
Figure 2Split graph of the cohort reconstructed using the Kimura-2-parameter corrected distances. The splits were refined since this significantly improved the fit. Bootstrap values are indicated on the edges and were performed using the Neighbor-Joining method on 1000 replicates (previously published in Mikhail et al., 2005). Bayesian trees were reconstructed in mrBayes v2.01. Network analysis was performed in Splitstree v 1.0.1, 2.4; Huson 1998).
Results of the Homoplasy Test and the Informative Sites Test
| Homoplasy Test | Informative Sites Test | |||
| P value | HR | P value | ISI | |
| complete genome | P < 0.001 | 0.254 | P < 0.001 | 0.34 |
| P < 0.017 | 0.565 | P < 0.098 | 0.38 | |
| P < 0.015 | 0.299 | P < 0.007 | 0.41 | |
| P < 0.043 | 0.152 | P < 0.002 | 0.42 |
Figure 3Non-synonymous : synonymous base rate ratio across the complete genome as estimated under a codon substitution model (MO) in a sliding window fashion with a step size of 81 bp and a window size of 801 bp, indicating the highest ratios within the env gene, followed by the pol, gag and nef genes, respectively.
Figure 4Linear regression plot for root to tip divergence versus sampling date within each patient of the cohort. All regressions had an R2 value above 0.92. This graph indicates the highest slope and thus evolutionary rate for recipient B, followed by recipient C and lowest evolutionary rate for non-progressing donor A.
Parameter estimates and log likelihoods under different clock models
| Model | Log L | Evolutionary rate | |
| Different Rates | 34 | -24119 | n.a. |
| Global clock | 21 | -24218 | ABC: 2.928 × l0-3 (± 0.72 × l0-3) |
| Local clock for A and (BC) | 22 | -24164 | A: 1.308 × l0-3 (± 0.19 × 10-3), BC: 5.08810-3 (± 0.41 × 10-3) |
| Local clock for A, B and C | 23 | -24156 | A: 1.008 × l0-3 (± 0.16 × 10-3), B: 1.2 × l0-2 (± 1.86 × 10-3), C: 4.8 × l0-3 (± 0.38 × 10-3) |
The amount of parameters used in the model.
The log likelihoods.
Figure 1Cohort patient profiles showing CD4+ and CD8+ T cell counts and plasma viral loads for patients A, B and C, respectively.