Literature DB >> 15984601

Dose-response comparison of budesonide dry powder inhalers using adenosine monophosphate bronchial challenge.

Brian J Lipworth1, Erika J Sims, Sudip K Das, Helen Buck, Michelle Paterson.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Bronchial hyperresponsiveness to adenosine monophosphate, an indirect measure of airway inflammation, is a sensitive marker of inhaled corticosteroid efficacy.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the relative therapeutic efficacy of budesonide delivered via Clickhaler and Turbuhaler dry powder inhalers in patients with mild-to-moderate persistent asthma.
METHODS: In a double-masked, dose-response crossover study, 27 patients received inhaled budesonide in cumulative sequential doubling dose increments, 2 weeks per dose, of 200, 400, and 800 microg/d. Each treatment block was preceded by 1- to 3-week placebo run-in and washout periods. End points were measured after each placebo (ie, baseline) and treatment period. Adenosine monophosphate bronchial challenge was the primary outcome, and exhaled nitric oxide, serum eosinophilic cationic protein, spirometry, domiciliary peak expiratory flow, symptoms, and rescue medication use were the secondary outcomes.
RESULTS: For the adenosine monophosphate provocation concentration that caused a decrease in forced expiratory volume in 1 second of 20% (PC20), a significant overall dose-response effect (P = .006) was found, and there was no significant difference between the devices (P = .8). The relative microgram dose potency ratio between Clickhaler and Turbuhaler was 1.11 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.50-2.46). After administration of the highest dose of budesonide, the mean doubling dilution shift in adenosine monophosphate PC20 from placebo baseline was 3.46 (95% CI, 2.66-4.27) with the Clickhaler vs 3.41 (95% CI, 2.47-4.35) with the Turbuhaler. A significant overall dose-response effect was demonstrated for exhaled nitric oxide (P = .03) but not for any of the other secondary outcome measures. There were no significant differences between the devices for any of the outcome measures.
CONCLUSION: Inhaled budesonide exhibited overall dose-response effects on adenosine monophosphate PC20 delivered via Turbuhaler and Clickhaler, with no significant difference between the devices.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15984601     DOI: 10.1016/S1081-1206(10)61327-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol        ISSN: 1081-1206            Impact factor:   6.347


  4 in total

1.  Regulatory Considerations for Approval of Generic Inhalation Drug Products in the US, EU, Brazil, China, and India.

Authors:  Sau L Lee; Bhawana Saluja; Alfredo García-Arieta; Gustavo Mendes Lima Santos; Ying Li; Sarah Lu; Shuguang Hou; Juliet Rebello; Abhijit Vaidya; Jaideep Gogtay; Shrinivas Purandare; Svetlana Lyapustina
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2015-05-23       Impact factor: 4.009

2.  Proof of concept study to evaluate step-down therapy with inhaled corticosteroid alone or additive therapy on surrogate inflammatory markers in asthma.

Authors:  Lorna McKinlay; Peter A Williamson; Philip M Short; Tom C Fardon; Brian J Lipworth
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 4.335

3.  Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic comparison of hydrofluoroalkane and chlorofluorocarbon formulations of budesonide.

Authors:  Karine L Clearie; Peter A Williamson; Karen Meldrum; Michael Gillen; Lars-Goran Carlsson; Marie Carlholm; Jan Ekelund; Brian J Lipworth
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 4.335

4.  Is low dose inhaled corticosteroid therapy as effective for inflammation and remodeling in asthma? A randomized, parallel group study.

Authors:  Melissa Baraket; Brian G G Oliver; Janette K Burgess; Sam Lim; Gregory G King; Judith L Black
Journal:  Respir Res       Date:  2012-02-02
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.