Literature DB >> 15983411

The temperature of flash-cooling has dramatic effects on the diffraction quality of nucleosome crystals.

Rajeswari S Edayathumangalam1, Karolin Luger.   

Abstract

Nucleosome core-particle crystals are routinely flash-cooled in liquid propane at temperatures of approximately 153 K, followed by transfer into a cold nitrogen-gas stream (approximately 93 K). Analysis of diffraction data from crystals flash-cooled at different temperatures shows that the optimal temperature is approximately 153 K. The data quality worsens, with a concomitant reduction in the diffraction limit, at temperatures both higher and lower than 153 K. With some batches of crystals, significant shrinkage of the unit-cell volume is also observed at temperatures of 138 K and lower. The lattice shrinkage is always restricted to the c axis, concurrent with closer packing of two nucleosomes. Direct plunge-cooling of crystals in liquid nitrogen leads to loss of diffraction quality and resolution limit. Thus, in cases where flash-cooling into liquid nitrogen is detrimental to diffraction, optimizing cooling protocols at higher temperatures using liquid propane or other cryogens with similar properties may lead to dramatically improved results. In a related study, it is shown that a nucleosome crystal transported under 'cryocooled' conditions has higher mosaicity and yields inferior data quality in comparison to a crystal cryocooled at the synchrotron. For fragile crystals, transport in mother liquor and/or cryoprotectant followed by subsequent flash-cooling at the synchrotron may be the best procedure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15983411     DOI: 10.1107/S0907444905008541

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr        ISSN: 0907-4449


  7 in total

1.  Slow cooling of protein crystals.

Authors:  Matthew Warkentin; Robert E Thorne
Journal:  J Appl Crystallogr       Date:  2009-08-01       Impact factor: 3.304

2.  Temperature-dependent radiation sensitivity and order of 70S ribosome crystals.

Authors:  Matthew Warkentin; Jesse B Hopkins; Jonah B Haber; Gregor Blaha; Robert E Thorne
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr       Date:  2014-10-23

3.  Slow cooling and temperature-controlled protein crystallography.

Authors:  Matthew Warkentin; Robert E Thorne
Journal:  J Struct Funct Genomics       Date:  2009-12-10

4.  Temperature-dependent macromolecular X-ray crystallography.

Authors:  Martin Weik; Jacques Philippe Colletier
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr       Date:  2010-03-24

Review 5.  Practical macromolecular cryocrystallography.

Authors:  J W Pflugrath
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr F Struct Biol Commun       Date:  2015-05-27       Impact factor: 1.056

6.  A comparison of gas stream cooling and plunge cooling of macromolecular crystals.

Authors:  Kaitlin Harrison; Zhenguo Wu; Douglas H Juers
Journal:  J Appl Crystallogr       Date:  2019-08-23       Impact factor: 3.304

7.  Comparison of side-chain dispersion in protein structures determined by cryo-EM and X-ray crystallography.

Authors:  Ashraya Ravikumar; Mrugsen Nagsen Gopnarayan; Sriram Subramaniam; Narayanaswamy Srinivasan
Journal:  IUCrJ       Date:  2021-12-10       Impact factor: 4.769

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.