Literature DB >> 15983387

Frag1, a homolog of alternative replication factor C subunits, links replication stress surveillance with apoptosis.

Hideshi Ishii1, Taeko Inageta, Koshi Mimori, Toshiyuki Saito, Hiroki Sasaki, Masaharu Isobe, Masaki Mori, Carlo M Croce, Kay Huebner, Keiya Ozawa, Yusuke Furukawa.   

Abstract

We report the identification and characterization of a potent regulator of genomic integrity, mouse and human FRAG1 gene, a conserved homolog of replication factor C large subunit that is homologous to the alternative replication factor C subunits Elg1, Ctf18/Chl12, and Rad24 of budding yeast. FRAG1 was identified in a search for key caretaker genes involved in the regulation of genomic stability under conditions of replicative stress. In response to stress, Atr participates in the down-regulation of FRAG1 expression, leading to the induction of apoptosis through the release of Rad9 from damaged chromatin during the S phase of the cell cycle, allowing Rad9-Bcl2 association and induction of proapoptotic Bax protein. We propose that the Frag1 signal pathway, by linking replication stress surveillance with apoptosis induction, plays a central role in determining whether DNA damage is compatible with cell survival or whether it requires cell elimination by apoptosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15983387      PMCID: PMC1172282          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0504222102

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  27 in total

1.  Regulation of ATR substrate selection by Rad17-dependent loading of Rad9 complexes onto chromatin.

Authors:  Lee Zou; David Cortez; Stephen J Elledge
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2002-01-15       Impact factor: 11.361

Review 2.  Cell cycle checkpoint signaling through the ATM and ATR kinases.

Authors:  R T Abraham
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2001-09-01       Impact factor: 11.361

3.  Physical interactions among human checkpoint control proteins HUS1p, RAD1p, and RAD9p, and implications for the regulation of cell cycle progression.

Authors:  H Hang; H B Lieberman
Journal:  Genomics       Date:  2000-04-01       Impact factor: 5.736

4.  Human homologue of S. pombe Rad9 interacts with BCL-2/BCL-xL and promotes apoptosis.

Authors:  K Komatsu; T Miyashita; H Hang; K M Hopkins; W Zheng; S Cuddeback; M Yamada; H B Lieberman; H G Wang
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 28.824

5.  Utilization of oriented peptide libraries to identify substrate motifs selected by ATM.

Authors:  T O'Neill; A J Dwyer; Y Ziv; D W Chan; S P Lees-Miller; R H Abraham; J H Lai; D Hill; Y Shiloh; L C Cantley; G A Rathbun
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2000-07-28       Impact factor: 5.157

6.  Human Rad9 is required for the activation of S-phase checkpoint and the maintenance of chromosomal stability.

Authors:  Tongyun Dang; Shideng Bao; Xiao-Fan Wang
Journal:  Genes Cells       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 1.891

Review 7.  Caretaker tumour suppressor genes that defend genome integrity.

Authors:  Nicola C Levitt; Ian D Hickson
Journal:  Trends Mol Med       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 11.951

8.  The large subunit of replication factor C promotes cell survival after DNA damage in an LxCxE motif- and Rb-dependent manner.

Authors:  V Pennaneach; I Salles-Passador; A Munshi; H Brickner; K Regazzoni; F Dick; N Dyson; T T Chen; J Y Wang; R Fotedar; A Fotedar
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 17.970

9.  c-Abl tyrosine kinase regulates the human Rad9 checkpoint protein in response to DNA damage.

Authors:  Kiyotsugu Yoshida; Kiyoshi Komatsu; Hong-Gang Wang; Donald Kufe
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 4.272

Review 10.  Evolution of functions within the p53/p63/p73 family.

Authors:  V De Laurenzi; G Melino
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 5.691

View more
  12 in total

1.  Loss of Hus1 sensitizes cells to etoposide-induced apoptosis by regulating BH3-only proteins.

Authors:  C L Meyerkord; Y Takahashi; R Araya; N Takada; R S Weiss; H-G Wang
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2008-09-15       Impact factor: 9.867

Review 2.  Contributions of Rad9 to tumorigenesis.

Authors:  Constantinos G Broustas; Howard B Lieberman
Journal:  J Cell Biochem       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 4.429

3.  Elg1, an alternative subunit of the RFC clamp loader, preferentially interacts with SUMOylated PCNA.

Authors:  Oren Parnas; Adi Zipin-Roitman; Boris Pfander; Batia Liefshitz; Yuval Mazor; Shay Ben-Aroya; Stefan Jentsch; Martin Kupiec
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2010-06-22       Impact factor: 11.598

4.  Host DNA damage response factors localize to merkel cell polyomavirus DNA replication sites to support efficient viral DNA replication.

Authors:  Sabrina H Tsang; Xin Wang; Jing Li; Christopher B Buck; Jianxin You
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2014-01-03       Impact factor: 5.103

Review 5.  DNA damage response genes and the development of cancer metastasis.

Authors:  Constantinos G Broustas; Howard B Lieberman
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2014-01-07       Impact factor: 2.841

6.  Disialogangliosides and TNFα alter gene expression for cytokines and chemokines in primary brain cell cultures.

Authors:  Donna M Byers; John C Gorbet; Louis N Irwin
Journal:  Neurochem Res       Date:  2011-10-01       Impact factor: 3.996

7.  The Brd4 extraterminal domain confers transcription activation independent of pTEFb by recruiting multiple proteins, including NSD3.

Authors:  Shaila Rahman; Mathew E Sowa; Matthias Ottinger; Jennifer A Smith; Yang Shi; J Wade Harper; Peter M Howley
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2011-05-09       Impact factor: 4.272

8.  Integrative network analysis identifies novel drivers of pathogenesis and progression in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma.

Authors:  A Laganà; D Perumal; D Melnekoff; B Readhead; B A Kidd; V Leshchenko; P-Y Kuo; J Keats; M DeRome; J Yesil; D Auclair; S Lonial; A Chari; H J Cho; B Barlogie; S Jagannath; J T Dudley; S Parekh
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2017-06-23       Impact factor: 11.528

9.  DNA damage responses by human ELG1 in S phase are important to maintain genomic integrity.

Authors:  Nilabja Sikdar; Soma Banerjee; Kyoo-young Lee; Stephen Wincovitch; Evgenia Pak; Koji Nakanishi; Maria Jasin; Amalia Dutra; Kyungjae Myung
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2009-10-07       Impact factor: 4.534

10.  Recruitment of Brd4 to the human papillomavirus type 16 DNA replication complex is essential for replication of viral DNA.

Authors:  Xin Wang; Christine M Helfer; Neha Pancholi; James E Bradner; Jianxin You
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2013-01-30       Impact factor: 5.103

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.