Literature DB >> 15981008

Lack of effect of a low-molecular-weight heparin (nadroparin) on mortality in bedridden medical in-patients: a prospective randomised double-blind study.

I Mahé1, J F Bergmann, P d'Azémar, J J Vaissie, C Caulin.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Hospitalised medical patients are at significant risk of venous thromboembolic disease through fatal pulmonary embolism; low-molecular-weight heparins have been proved efficient in preventing deep venous thrombosis in surgical and medical patients, but their effect on mortality in bedridden medical patients remains unknown.
METHODS: In a multi-centre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, 2,474 consecutive patients aged over 40 years admitted to internal medicine departments in the last 24 h and unable to move alone were randomised to receive 0.3 ml nadroparin (7,500 anti-Xa units) or placebo for up to 21 days. The primary end-point was overall mortality at day 21.
RESULTS: There were no significant differences between the patients' characteristics. Overall mortality between the two groups was not statistically different [10.08% (124 of 1,230) versus 10.29% (128 of 1,244), respectively, in the nadroparin and in the placebo groups; relative risk reduction 0.02, CI (-0.27, +0.25), P=0.89]. An autopsy was performed in 123 of the 252 patients who died (49%). Pulmonary embolism was discovered at autopsy in 10 of 63 patients in the nadroparin group and in 17 of 60 in the placebo group [relative risk reduction 0.38, CI (-0.27, +0.70), P=0.13].
CONCLUSION: Nadroparin does not have a significant effect on mortality in bedridden medical patients, based on the study results. The study provides no data suggesting that low-molecular-weight heparins might reduce the incidence of thromboembolic in-patients hospitalised for an acute medical disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15981008     DOI: 10.1007/s00228-005-0944-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol        ISSN: 0031-6970            Impact factor:   2.953


  17 in total

Review 1.  Prevention of venous thromboembolism.

Authors:  W H Geerts; J A Heit; G P Clagett; G F Pineo; C W Colwell; F A Anderson; H B Wheeler
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 9.410

2.  Heparin prophylaxis in bedridden patients.

Authors:  J F Bergmann; C Caulin
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1996-07-20       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  Autopsy proven pulmonary embolism in hospital patients: are we detecting enough deep vein thrombosis?

Authors:  D A Sandler; J F Martin
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 5.344

4.  Reduction of mortality in general medical in-patients by low-dose heparin prophylaxis.

Authors:  H Halkin; J Goldberg; M Modan; B Modan
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1982-05       Impact factor: 25.391

5.  Low molecular weight heparin for the prevention of deep venous thrombosis: a suitable monitoring in elderly patients?

Authors:  Isabelle Mahé; Ludovic Drouet; Oliver Chassany; Anne-Sophie Grenard; Charles Caulin; Jean-François Bergmann
Journal:  Pathophysiol Haemost Thromb       Date:  2002 May-Jun

6.  A comparison of enoxaparin with placebo for the prevention of venous thromboembolism in acutely ill medical patients. Prophylaxis in Medical Patients with Enoxaparin Study Group.

Authors:  M M Samama; A T Cohen; J Y Darmon; L Desjardins; A Eldor; C Janbon; A Leizorovicz; H Nguyen; C G Olsson; A G Turpie; N Weisslinger
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1999-09-09       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 7.  Prophylaxis and treatment of deep-vein thrombosis.

Authors:  H K Breddin
Journal:  Semin Thromb Hemost       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 4.180

8.  Collaborative overview of randomised trials of antiplatelet therapy--I: Prevention of death, myocardial infarction, and stroke by prolonged antiplatelet therapy in various categories of patients. Antiplatelet Trialists' Collaboration.

Authors: 
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1994-01-08

9.  Randomized, placebo-controlled trial of dalteparin for the prevention of venous thromboembolism in acutely ill medical patients.

Authors:  Alain Leizorovicz; Alexander T Cohen; Alexander G G Turpie; Carl-Gustav Olsson; Paul T Vaitkus; Samuel Z Goldhaber
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2004-08-02       Impact factor: 29.690

10.  Comparison of the pharmacokinetic profiles of three low molecular mass heparins--dalteparin, enoxaparin and nadroparin--administered subcutaneously in healthy volunteers (doses for prevention of thromboembolism).

Authors:  F Collignon; A Frydman; H Caplain; M L Ozoux; Y Le Roux; J Bouthier; J J Thébault
Journal:  Thromb Haemost       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 5.249

View more
  13 in total

Review 1.  Thrombotic Risk and Covid-19: Review of Current Evidence for a Better Diagnostic and Therapeutic Approach.

Authors:  Raquel López-Reyes; Grace Oscullo; David Jiménez; Irene Cano; Alberto García-Ortega
Journal:  Arch Bronconeumol       Date:  2020-08-31       Impact factor: 4.872

Review 2.  Effect of thromboprophylaxis with anticoagulant drugs on the incidence of arterial thrombotic events in medical inpatients: a systematic review.

Authors:  Alessandro Squizzato; Federico Lussana; Walter Ageno; Marco Cattaneo
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2016-03-15       Impact factor: 3.397

Review 3.  Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in medically ill patients: a mixed treatment comparison meta-analysis.

Authors:  Majed S Al Yami; Matthew A Silva; Jennifer L Donovan; Abir O Kanaan
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 2.300

Review 4.  Benefits versus risks of pharmacological prophylaxis to prevent symptomatic venous thromboembolism in unselected medical patients revisited. Meta-analysis of the medical literature.

Authors:  Moshe Vardi; Michal Steinberg; Michal Haran; Shai Cohen
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 2.300

5.  American Society of Hematology 2018 guidelines for management of venous thromboembolism: prophylaxis for hospitalized and nonhospitalized medical patients.

Authors:  Holger J Schünemann; Mary Cushman; Allison E Burnett; Susan R Kahn; Jan Beyer-Westendorf; Frederick A Spencer; Suely M Rezende; Neil A Zakai; Kenneth A Bauer; Francesco Dentali; Jill Lansing; Sara Balduzzi; Andrea Darzi; Gian Paolo Morgano; Ignacio Neumann; Robby Nieuwlaat; Juan J Yepes-Nuñez; Yuan Zhang; Wojtek Wiercioch
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2018-11-27

Review 6.  Nadroparin for the prevention of venous thromboembolism in nonsurgical patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Walter Ageno; Jacqueline Bosch; Michel Cucherat; John W Eikelboom
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 2.300

7.  American Society of Hematology 2021 guidelines for management of venous thromboembolism: prevention and treatment in patients with cancer.

Authors:  Gary H Lyman; Marc Carrier; Cihan Ay; Marcello Di Nisio; Lisa K Hicks; Alok A Khorana; Andrew D Leavitt; Agnes Y Y Lee; Fergus Macbeth; Rebecca L Morgan; Simon Noble; Elizabeth A Sexton; David Stenehjem; Wojtek Wiercioch; Lara A Kahale; Pablo Alonso-Coello
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2021-02-23

Review 8.  Diet as prophylaxis and treatment for venous thromboembolism?

Authors:  David K Cundiff; Paul S Agutter; P Colm Malone; John C Pezzullo
Journal:  Theor Biol Med Model       Date:  2010-08-11       Impact factor: 2.432

9.  The paradox of ventilator-associated pneumonia prevention measures.

Authors:  Michael Klompas
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2009-10-15       Impact factor: 9.097

Review 10.  Heparin for the prevention of venous thromboembolism in acutely ill medical patients (excluding stroke and myocardial infarction).

Authors:  Raza Alikhan; Rachel Bedenis; Alexander T Cohen
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2014-05-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.