PURPOSE: To characterize the age dependence of isolated human crystalline lens power and quantify the contributions of the lens surfaces and refractive index gradient. METHODS: Experiments were performed on 100 eyes of 73 donors (average 2.8 +/- 1.6 days postmortem) with an age range of 6 to 94 years. Lens power was measured with a modified commercial lensmeter or with an optical system based on the Scheiner principle. The radius of curvature and asphericity of the isolated lens surfaces were measured by shadow photography. For each lens, the contributions of the surfaces and the refractive index gradient to the measured lens power were calculated by using optical ray-tracing software. The age dependency of these refractive powers was assessed. RESULTS: The total refractive power and surface refractive power both showed a biphasic age dependency. The total power decreased at a rate of -0.41 D/y between ages 6 and 58.1, and increased at a rate of 0.33D/y between ages 58.1 and 82. The surface contribution decreased at a rate of -0.13 D/y between ages 6 and 55.2 and increased at a rate of 0.04 D/y between ages 55.2 and 94. The relative contribution of the surfaces increased by 0.17% per year. The equivalent refractive index also showed a biphasic age dependency with a decrease at a rate of -3.9 x 10(-4) per year from ages 6 to 60.4 followed by a plateau. CONCLUSIONS: The lens power decreases with age, due mainly to a decrease in the contribution of the gradient. The use of a constant equivalent refractive index value to calculate lens power with the lens maker formula will underestimate the power of young lenses and overestimate the power of older lenses.
PURPOSE: To characterize the age dependence of isolated human crystalline lens power and quantify the contributions of the lens surfaces and refractive index gradient. METHODS: Experiments were performed on 100 eyes of 73 donors (average 2.8 +/- 1.6 days postmortem) with an age range of 6 to 94 years. Lens power was measured with a modified commercial lensmeter or with an optical system based on the Scheiner principle. The radius of curvature and asphericity of the isolated lens surfaces were measured by shadow photography. For each lens, the contributions of the surfaces and the refractive index gradient to the measured lens power were calculated by using optical ray-tracing software. The age dependency of these refractive powers was assessed. RESULTS: The total refractive power and surface refractive power both showed a biphasic age dependency. The total power decreased at a rate of -0.41 D/y between ages 6 and 58.1, and increased at a rate of 0.33D/y between ages 58.1 and 82. The surface contribution decreased at a rate of -0.13 D/y between ages 6 and 55.2 and increased at a rate of 0.04 D/y between ages 55.2 and 94. The relative contribution of the surfaces increased by 0.17% per year. The equivalent refractive index also showed a biphasic age dependency with a decrease at a rate of -3.9 x 10(-4) per year from ages 6 to 60.4 followed by a plateau. CONCLUSIONS: The lens power decreases with age, due mainly to a decrease in the contribution of the gradient. The use of a constant equivalent refractive index value to calculate lens power with the lens maker formula will underestimate the power of young lenses and overestimate the power of older lenses.
Authors: Fabrice Manns; Viviana Fernandez; Stanley Zipper; Samith Sandadi; Marie Hamaoui; Arthur Ho; Jean Marie Parel Journal: Exp Eye Res Date: 2004-01 Impact factor: 3.467
Authors: Jenny M Ip; Son C Huynh; Annette Kifley; Kathryn A Rose; Ian G Morgan; Rohit Varma; Paul Mitchell Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2007-10 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Bianca M Maceo; Fabrice Manns; David Borja; Derek Nankivil; Stephen Uhlhorn; Esdras Arrieta; Arthur Ho; Robert C Augusteyn; Jean-Marie Parel Journal: J Vis Date: 2011-11-30 Impact factor: 2.240
Authors: Victor M Hernandez; Florence Cabot; Marco Ruggeri; Carolina de Freitas; Arthur Ho; Sonia Yoo; Jean-Marie Parel; Fabrice Manns Journal: Biomed Opt Express Date: 2015-10-21 Impact factor: 3.732
Authors: Xiaojuan Hao; Justine L Jeffery; Tam P T Le; Gail McFarland; Graham Johnson; Roger J Mulder; Qian Garrett; Fabrice Manns; Derek Nankivil; Esdras Arrieta; Arthur Ho; Jean-Marie Parel; Timothy C Hughes Journal: Biomaterials Date: 2012-05-15 Impact factor: 12.479
Authors: Raksha Urs; Fabrice Manns; Arthur Ho; David Borja; Adriana Amelinckx; Jared Smith; Rakhi Jain; Robert Augusteyn; Jean-Marie Parel Journal: Vision Res Date: 2008-11-08 Impact factor: 1.886