Literature DB >> 18316704

Optical power of the isolated human crystalline lens.

David Borja1, Fabrice Manns, Arthur Ho, Noel Ziebarth, Alexandre M Rosen, Rakhi Jain, Adriana Amelinckx, Esdras Arrieta, Robert C Augusteyn, Jean-Marie Parel.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To characterize the age dependence of isolated human crystalline lens power and quantify the contributions of the lens surfaces and refractive index gradient.
METHODS: Experiments were performed on 100 eyes of 73 donors (average 2.8 +/- 1.6 days postmortem) with an age range of 6 to 94 years. Lens power was measured with a modified commercial lensmeter or with an optical system based on the Scheiner principle. The radius of curvature and asphericity of the isolated lens surfaces were measured by shadow photography. For each lens, the contributions of the surfaces and the refractive index gradient to the measured lens power were calculated by using optical ray-tracing software. The age dependency of these refractive powers was assessed.
RESULTS: The total refractive power and surface refractive power both showed a biphasic age dependency. The total power decreased at a rate of -0.41 D/y between ages 6 and 58.1, and increased at a rate of 0.33D/y between ages 58.1 and 82. The surface contribution decreased at a rate of -0.13 D/y between ages 6 and 55.2 and increased at a rate of 0.04 D/y between ages 55.2 and 94. The relative contribution of the surfaces increased by 0.17% per year. The equivalent refractive index also showed a biphasic age dependency with a decrease at a rate of -3.9 x 10(-4) per year from ages 6 to 60.4 followed by a plateau.
CONCLUSIONS: The lens power decreases with age, due mainly to a decrease in the contribution of the gradient. The use of a constant equivalent refractive index value to calculate lens power with the lens maker formula will underestimate the power of young lenses and overestimate the power of older lenses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18316704      PMCID: PMC2785024          DOI: 10.1167/iovs.07-1385

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci        ISSN: 0146-0404            Impact factor:   4.799


  32 in total

Review 1.  Radius of curvature and asphericity of the anterior and posterior surface of human cadaver crystalline lenses.

Authors:  Fabrice Manns; Viviana Fernandez; Stanley Zipper; Samith Sandadi; Marie Hamaoui; Arthur Ho; Jean Marie Parel
Journal:  Exp Eye Res       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 3.467

2.  Age-related changes in refractive index distribution and power of the human lens as measured by magnetic resonance micro-imaging in vitro.

Authors:  B A Moffat; D A Atchison; J M Pope
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Numerical modelling of the accommodating lens.

Authors:  H J Burd; S J Judge; J A Cross
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Scheimpflug and high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging of the anterior segment: a comparative study.

Authors:  Jane E Koretz; Susan A Strenk; Lawrence M Strenk; John L Semmlow
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 2.129

5.  A method of determining the equivalent powers of the eye and its crystalline lens without resort to phakometry.

Authors:  A G Bennett
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 3.117

6.  Spherical aberration of the crystalline lens.

Authors:  J G Sivak; R O Kreuzer
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  Aspheric curvatures for the human lens.

Authors:  M J Howcroft; J A Parker
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1977       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  The shape of the aging human lens: curvature, equivalent refractive index and the lens paradox.

Authors:  M Dubbelman; G L Van der Heijde
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  Central surface curvatures of postmortem- extracted intact human crystalline lenses: implications for understanding the mechanism of accommodation.

Authors:  Ronald A Schachar
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 12.079

10.  Variation of the contribution from axial length and other oculometric parameters to refraction by age and ethnicity.

Authors:  Jenny M Ip; Son C Huynh; Annette Kifley; Kathryn A Rose; Ian G Morgan; Rohit Varma; Paul Mitchell
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 4.799

View more
  26 in total

1.  Contribution of the crystalline lens gradient refractive index to the accommodation amplitude in non-human primates: in vitro studies.

Authors:  Bianca M Maceo; Fabrice Manns; David Borja; Derek Nankivil; Stephen Uhlhorn; Esdras Arrieta; Arthur Ho; Robert C Augusteyn; Jean-Marie Parel
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2011-11-30       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  Age-dependent Fourier model of the shape of the isolated ex vivo human crystalline lens.

Authors:  Raksha Urs; Arthur Ho; Fabrice Manns; Jean-Marie Parel
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2010-03-23       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Calculation of crystalline lens power using a modification of the Bennett method.

Authors:  Victor M Hernandez; Florence Cabot; Marco Ruggeri; Carolina de Freitas; Arthur Ho; Sonia Yoo; Jean-Marie Parel; Fabrice Manns
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2015-10-21       Impact factor: 3.732

4.  High refractive index polysiloxane as injectable, in situ curable accommodating intraocular lens.

Authors:  Xiaojuan Hao; Justine L Jeffery; Tam P T Le; Gail McFarland; Graham Johnson; Roger J Mulder; Qian Garrett; Fabrice Manns; Derek Nankivil; Esdras Arrieta; Arthur Ho; Jean-Marie Parel; Timothy C Hughes
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2012-05-15       Impact factor: 12.479

5.  Influence of shape and gradient refractive index in the accommodative changes of spherical aberration in nonhuman primate crystalline lenses.

Authors:  Alberto de Castro; Judith Birkenfeld; Bianca Maceo; Fabrice Manns; Esdras Arrieta; Jean-Marie Parel; Susana Marcos
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2013-09-11       Impact factor: 4.799

6.  Semiautomated analysis of optical coherence tomography crystalline lens images under simulated accommodation.

Authors:  Eon Kim; Klaus Ehrmann; Stephen Uhlhorn; David Borja; Esdras Arrieta-Quintero; Jean-Marie Parel
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 3.170

7.  Age-dependence of the optomechanical responses of ex vivo human lenses from India and the USA, and the force required to produce these in a lens stretcher: the similarity to in vivo disaccommodation.

Authors:  Robert C Augusteyn; Ashik Mohamed; Derek Nankivil; Pesala Veerendranath; Esdras Arrieta; Mukesh Taneja; Fabrice Manns; Arthur Ho; Jean-Marie Parel
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2011-05-24       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  System for on- and off-axis volumetric OCT imaging and ray tracing aberrometry of the crystalline lens.

Authors:  Marco Ruggeri; Siobhan Williams; Bianca Maceo Heilman; Yue Yao; Yu-Cherng Chang; Ashik Mohamed; N Geetha Sravani; Heather Durkee; Cornelis Rowaan; Alex Gonzalez; Arthur Ho; Jean-Marie Parel; Fabrice Manns
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2018-07-24       Impact factor: 3.732

9.  Shape of the isolated ex-vivo human crystalline lens.

Authors:  Raksha Urs; Fabrice Manns; Arthur Ho; David Borja; Adriana Amelinckx; Jared Smith; Rakhi Jain; Robert Augusteyn; Jean-Marie Parel
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2008-11-08       Impact factor: 1.886

10.  Refractive index measurement of the isolated crystalline lens using optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Stephen R Uhlhorn; David Borja; Fabrice Manns; Jean-Marie Parel
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2008-10-22       Impact factor: 1.886

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.