PURPOSE: To examine medical students' emotional reactions to their "most memorable" patient death and the support they receive. METHOD: In 2000-01, 65 third-year medical students at two Northeastern U.S. medical schools were randomly selected to participate in 60-90-minute interviews of open-ended and structured questions and a written questionnaire (using a ten-point scale) about their "most memorable" patient death. Independent reviewers coded each interview to identify the analytical categories. Descriptive data were generated from the written questionnaire. RESULTS: A total of 32 interviews were used in the analysis. Twelve (38%) students were in contact with the patient for less than 24 hours and 23 (73%) were not at all or minimally close to the patient (0-3 on ten-point scale). Sixteen of 28 students (57%) rated the impact of the death as highly emotionally powerful (7-10 on ten-point scale). The finality of deaths, particularly sudden deaths, evoked strong emotions. Four of 16 (25%) students who found the death highly emotionally powerful rated the amount of support from supervisors as extremely inadequate (0-3 on ten-point scale). There was no discussion of the death in 17 (63%) of the 27 cases in which the patient was cared for by the student's team. Students perceived from supervising physicians that death and emotions are negative aspects of medicine. CONCLUSIONS: Medical students experienced patient deaths as emotionally powerful even when they were not close to the patients. Debriefing sessions with students were rare, and many students felt inadequately supported. Thus, a unique opportunity to teach about death, emotions and coping with stress is often lost.
PURPOSE: To examine medical students' emotional reactions to their "most memorable" patientdeath and the support they receive. METHOD: In 2000-01, 65 third-year medical students at two Northeastern U.S. medical schools were randomly selected to participate in 60-90-minute interviews of open-ended and structured questions and a written questionnaire (using a ten-point scale) about their "most memorable" patientdeath. Independent reviewers coded each interview to identify the analytical categories. Descriptive data were generated from the written questionnaire. RESULTS: A total of 32 interviews were used in the analysis. Twelve (38%) students were in contact with the patient for less than 24 hours and 23 (73%) were not at all or minimally close to the patient (0-3 on ten-point scale). Sixteen of 28 students (57%) rated the impact of the death as highly emotionally powerful (7-10 on ten-point scale). The finality of deaths, particularly sudden deaths, evoked strong emotions. Four of 16 (25%) students who found the death highly emotionally powerful rated the amount of support from supervisors as extremely inadequate (0-3 on ten-point scale). There was no discussion of the death in 17 (63%) of the 27 cases in which the patient was cared for by the student's team. Students perceived from supervising physicians that death and emotions are negative aspects of medicine. CONCLUSIONS: Medical students experienced patient deaths as emotionally powerful even when they were not close to the patients. Debriefing sessions with students were rare, and many students felt inadequately supported. Thus, a unique opportunity to teach about death, emotions and coping with stress is often lost.
Authors: Sandra Sanchez-Reilly; Laura J Morrison; Elise Carey; Rachelle Bernacki; Lynn O'Neill; Jennifer Kapo; Vyjeyanthi S Periyakoil; Jane de Lima Thomas Journal: J Support Oncol Date: 2013-06
Authors: Susan Eggly; Kathleen L Meert; John Berger; Jerry Zimmerman; Kanwaljeet J S Anand; Christopher J L Newth; Rick Harrison; Joseph Carcillo; J Michael Dean; Douglas F Willson; Carol Nicholson Journal: Pediatr Crit Care Med Date: 2011-03 Impact factor: 3.624