Literature DB >> 15978776

Bone quality at the implant site after reconstruction of a local defect of the maxillary anterior ridge with chin bone or deproteinised cancellous bovine bone.

L Meijndert1, G M Raghoebar, P Schüpbach, H J A Meijer, A Vissink.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate the quality of bone at grafted implant sites in the anterior maxilla. Grafting of these sites was necessary because of insufficient bone volume in a buccopalatinal direction (width at the top of the crest 1-3mm). Reconstruction was performed with chin bone (N=5), chin bone and a resorbable Bio-Gide GBR membrane (N=5) or Bio-Oss spongiosa granules in combination with a Bio-Gide GBR membrane (N=5). Biopsies were taken prior to implantation, i.e. 3 months after grafting with chin bone, and 6 months after grafting with Bio-Oss. Evaluation was done by assessing the histological and histomorphometric characteristics of full-length biopsies taken from the actual implant site. Both areas with non-vital bone and areas with apposition of bone and remodelling phenomena were observed in the chin bone group at the time of placement of the implants. Similar results were observed at implant sites reconstructed with a chin bone graft covered by a membrane. In the chin bone group without and with a GBR membrane, the mean total bone volume (TBV) was 55.2+/-6.8% and 57.7+/-11.5%, respectively; the marrow connective tissue volume (MCTV) was 44.8+/-6.8% and 42.3+/-11.5%, respectively. Remnants of the resorbable GBR membrane were not detected. In the Bio-Oss((R)) group, at implant placement some newly formed bone was observed in the connective tissue surrounding the Bio-Oss((R)) particles (mean TBV (newly formed bone) 17.6+/-14.5%), but most particles were surrounded by connective tissue. No convincing signs of remodelling were observed (mean remaining Bio-Oss volume 40.5+/-9.3%; mean MCTV 41.9+/-13.1%). No implants were lost during follow up (12 months). At the time of placement of the implants the grafting material (either chin bone or Bio-Oss is still not fully replaced by new vital bone. In case of Bio-Oss, most of the grafting material is even still present. Despite these differences, the 1-year clinical results were very good and comparable between the various grafting techniques applied.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15978776     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2005.04.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg        ISSN: 0901-5027            Impact factor:   2.789


  13 in total

Review 1.  Complications related to bone augmentation procedures of localized defects in the alveolar ridge. A retrospective clinical study.

Authors:  Anders Torp Jensen; Simon Storgård Jensen; Nils Worsaae
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2016-03-02

2.  Alveolar ridge augmentation using chin bone graft, bovine bone mineral, and titanium mesh: Clinical, histological, and histomorphomtric study.

Authors:  Jihad Khamees; Mohammad Atef Darwiche; Nabil Kochaji
Journal:  J Indian Soc Periodontol       Date:  2012-04

3.  Synthesis of three-dimensional calcium carbonate nanofibrous structure from eggshell using femtosecond laser ablation.

Authors:  Amirhossein Tavangar; Bo Tan; Krishnan Venkatakrishnan
Journal:  J Nanobiotechnology       Date:  2011-01-20       Impact factor: 10.435

4.  Comparing alveolar bone regeneration using Bio-Oss and autogenous bone grafts in humans: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Alireza Akbarzadeh Baghban; Azam Dehghani; Farzin Ghanavati; Farid Zayeri; Farzam Ghanavati
Journal:  Iran Endod J       Date:  2009-10-10

5.  Hydroxyapatite crystallinity does not affect the repair of critical size bone defects.

Authors:  Marcio Baltazar Conz; José Mauro Granjeiro; Gloria de Almeida Soares
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2011-06-03       Impact factor: 2.698

6.  Case presentation of two patients using diagonal platform-switched double implants for maxillary single-first-molar replacement as the alternative of a single-tooth implant.

Authors:  Yasunori Hotta; Koji Ito; Shinichi Komatsu; Takashi Saito
Journal:  Int J Implant Dent       Date:  2015-11-12

Review 7.  Guided Bone Regeneration for the Reconstruction of Alveolar Bone Defects.

Authors:  Arash Khojasteh; Lida Kheiri; Saeed Reza Motamedian; Vahid Khoshkam
Journal:  Ann Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2017 Jul-Dec

Review 8.  Barrier membranes: More than the barrier effect?

Authors:  Omar Omar; Ibrahim Elgali; Christer Dahlin; Peter Thomsen
Journal:  J Clin Periodontol       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 8.728

9.  Puerarin improves graft bone defect through microRNA‑155‑3p‑mediated p53/TNF‑α/STAT1 signaling pathway.

Authors:  Yang Zhou; Hongyu Lian; Kexin Liu; Deli Wang; Xuelian Xiu; Zhang Sun
Journal:  Int J Mol Med       Date:  2020-05-06       Impact factor: 4.101

10.  Bone Formation in Grafts with Bio-Oss and Autogenous Bone at Different Proportions in Rabbit Calvaria.

Authors:  Yeon Jung Kim; Carlos Eduardo Takeshi Saiki; Karoline Silva; Carlos Kiyoshi Moreira Massuda; Ana Paula de Souza Faloni; Paulo Henrique Braz-Silva; Debora Pallos; Wilson Roberto Sendyk
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2020-02-19
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.