BACKGROUND: Exploring bariatric surgery use provides data on effective treatment allocation. This study analyzed national rates of bariatric surgery use and the burden of morbid obesity by gender, census region, and age. STUDY DESIGN: Patients 18 years of age or older undergoing bariatric surgery were identified from the US 2002 Nationwide Inpatient Sample, and the national morbidly obese population 18 years of age or older was determined using the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 2002 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System databases. General population data were obtained from 2000 census data. Annual rates of bariatric surgery procedures were determined by gender, age group, and census region (Northeast, Midwest, South, and West). Rate ratios were calculated and significance tested through 95% confidence intervals (95% CI), accounting for the Nationwide Inpatient Sample and Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System sampling design. RESULTS: In 2002, a national cohort of 69,490 bariatric surgery patients was identified. Of these patients 85% were women and 76% were ages 18 to 49 years. The prevalence of morbid obesity (body mass index > or = 40 kg/m(2)) in the US in 2002 was 1.8%; 60% of morbidly obese people were women, and 63% were ages 18 to 49 years. The rates of bariatric surgery procedures per 100,000 morbidly obese individuals ranged from a low of 139 in men aged 60 years and older in the Midwest to a high of 5,156 in women ages 40 to 49 years in the Northeast. For both men and women, bariatric surgery rates in the West and Northeast were 1.35 (95% CI 1.31 to 1.40, p < 0.05) to 4.51 (95% CI 4.15 to 4.89, p < 0.05) times higher than in the South, respectively; rates in the Midwest were similar to those in the South. CONCLUSIONS: National estimates suggest that bariatric surgery rates do not parallel the burden of morbid obesity by region or age. Additional evaluation of these differences is necessary for optimal bariatric surgery use.
BACKGROUND: Exploring bariatric surgery use provides data on effective treatment allocation. This study analyzed national rates of bariatric surgery use and the burden of morbid obesity by gender, census region, and age. STUDY DESIGN:Patients 18 years of age or older undergoing bariatric surgery were identified from the US 2002 Nationwide Inpatient Sample, and the national morbidly obese population 18 years of age or older was determined using the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 2002 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System databases. General population data were obtained from 2000 census data. Annual rates of bariatric surgery procedures were determined by gender, age group, and census region (Northeast, Midwest, South, and West). Rate ratios were calculated and significance tested through 95% confidence intervals (95% CI), accounting for the Nationwide Inpatient Sample and Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System sampling design. RESULTS: In 2002, a national cohort of 69,490 bariatric surgery patients was identified. Of these patients 85% were women and 76% were ages 18 to 49 years. The prevalence of morbid obesity (body mass index > or = 40 kg/m(2)) in the US in 2002 was 1.8%; 60% of morbidly obesepeople were women, and 63% were ages 18 to 49 years. The rates of bariatric surgery procedures per 100,000 morbidly obese individuals ranged from a low of 139 in men aged 60 years and older in the Midwest to a high of 5,156 in women ages 40 to 49 years in the Northeast. For both men and women, bariatric surgery rates in the West and Northeast were 1.35 (95% CI 1.31 to 1.40, p < 0.05) to 4.51 (95% CI 4.15 to 4.89, p < 0.05) times higher than in the South, respectively; rates in the Midwest were similar to those in the South. CONCLUSIONS: National estimates suggest that bariatric surgery rates do not parallel the burden of morbid obesity by region or age. Additional evaluation of these differences is necessary for optimal bariatric surgery use.
Authors: Sanjit K Bhogal; Jacinta I Reddigan; Ori D Rotstein; Ashley Cohen; Dresden Glockler; Andrea C Tricco; Janet K Smylie; Stephen A Glazer; Jason Pennington; Lesley Gotlib Conn; Timothy D Jackson Journal: Obes Surg Date: 2015-05 Impact factor: 4.129
Authors: Martin Fried; Vojtech Hainer; Arnaud Basdevant; Henry Buchwald; Mervyn Deitel; Nicholas Finer; Jan Willem M Greve; Fritz Horber; Elisabeth Mathus-Vliegen; Nicola Scopinaro; Rudolf Steffen; Constantine Tsigos; Rudolf Weiner; Kurt Widhalm Journal: Obes Surg Date: 2007-02 Impact factor: 4.129
Authors: J Gould; J Ellsmere; R Fanelli; M Hutter; S Jones; J Pratt; P Schauer; B Schirmer; S Schwaitzberg; D B Jones Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2010-12-07 Impact factor: 4.584