Literature DB >> 1597738

Whole-body positron emission tomography: Part I. Methods and performance characteristics.

M Dahlbom1, E J Hoffman, C K Hoh, C Schiepers, G Rosenqvist, R A Hawkins, M E Phelps.   

Abstract

Methods for whole-body PET imaging have been developed to provide a clinical tool for the detection and evaluation of primary and metastatic cancers. The axial FOV of the PET system is extended by imaging at multiple bed positions to cover the whole body. In typical rectilinear PET scans, only a small fraction of the data is collected to form two-dimensional projection images. In this work, 100% of the projection data was collected to form the two-dimensional projection images. These projection images were generated for continuous angles over 180 degrees by resorting sinogram data. In addition, tomographic images were formed by using filtered backprojection reconstruction without attenuation correction. Coronal and sagittal cuts were then extracted from the three-dimensional data set. The tomographic images were reconstructed to a resolution of 10.8 mm in all dimensions because of statistical limitations of the data. Both methods of image formation resulted in images of high quality with the tomographic reconstruction providing the highest contrast and resolution. An acquisition time of 1-2 min/bed position after a 10-mCi injection of [18F]fluoride ion or [18F]FDG was found to give a sufficient number of counts for producing images of good resolution and contrast, from a total scanning time of 32-64 min.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1597738

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nucl Med        ISSN: 0161-5505            Impact factor:   10.057


  21 in total

1.  Requirements for clinical PET: comparisons within Europe.

Authors:  Michael Bedford; Michael N Maisey
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 9.236

2.  Standardized uptake values of fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose: the value of different normalization procedures.

Authors:  A Schomburg; H Bender; C Reichel; T Sommer; J Ruhlmann; B Kozak; H J Biersack
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med       Date:  1996-05

3.  The timing of adoption of positron emission tomography: a real options approach.

Authors:  Paolo Pertile; Emanuele Torri; Luciano Flor; Stefano Tardivo
Journal:  Health Care Manag Sci       Date:  2009-09

Review 4.  History and future technical innovation in positron emission tomography.

Authors:  Terry Jones; David Townsend
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2017-03-31

Review 5.  Dynamic whole-body PET imaging: principles, potentials and applications.

Authors:  Arman Rahmim; Martin A Lodge; Nicolas A Karakatsanis; Vladimir Y Panin; Yun Zhou; Alan McMillan; Steve Cho; Habib Zaidi; Michael E Casey; Richard L Wahl
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2018-09-29       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 6.  Imaging in oncology--over a century of advances.

Authors:  Bhuey Sharma; Axel Martin; Susannah Stanway; Stephen R D Johnston; Anastasia Constantinidou
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-11-13       Impact factor: 66.675

7.  Positron emission tomography provides molecular imaging of biological processes.

Authors:  M E Phelps
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-08-01       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 8.  Tracer imaging in lung cancer.

Authors:  H M Abdel-Dayem; A Scott; H Macapinlac; S Larson
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med       Date:  1994-01

9.  FDG PET imaging of paragangliomas of the neck: comparison with MIBG SPET.

Authors:  D J Macfarlane; B L Shulkin; K Murphy; G T Wolf
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med       Date:  1995-11

10.  Dynamic whole-body PET parametric imaging: II. Task-oriented statistical estimation.

Authors:  Nicolas A Karakatsanis; Martin A Lodge; Y Zhou; Richard L Wahl; Arman Rahmim
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2013-09-30       Impact factor: 3.609

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.